• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

植入窄牙槽嵴的楔形种植体的长期临床结果:一项7年随访的多中心前瞻性单臂队列研究。

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Wedge-Shaped Implants Inserted in Narrow Ridges: A 7-Year Follow-Up Multicenter Prospective Single-Arm Cohort Study.

作者信息

Rapani Antonio, Vercellotti Tomaso, Stacchi Claudio, Gregorig Gianluca, Oreglia Francesco, Morella Emanuele, Lombardi Teresa

机构信息

Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34129 Trieste, Italy.

Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genova, 16100 Genova, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Sep 6;14(17):6299. doi: 10.3390/jcm14176299.

DOI:10.3390/jcm14176299
PMID:40944058
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12429830/
Abstract

Wedge-shaped implants have been proposed as a minimally invasive solution for narrow alveolar ridges, aiming to avoid bone augmentation. While the short-term results are promising, long-term clinical evidence remains limited. This multicenter prospective single-arm cohort study reports the 7-year outcomes of tissue-level wedge-shaped implants (1.8 mm thickness) placed without grafting in horizontally atrophic ridges (mean thickness 3.73 ± 0.36 mm). Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed on 45 implants (34 patients). At the 7-year post-loading follow-up, the implant survival rate was 95.5%, with two failures recorded-one early loss and one due to peri-implantitis. Peri-implant mucositis was observed in 5 implants (11.4%), while peri-implantitis was diagnosed in 3 implants (6.8%). No mechanical complications were reported. The mean marginal bone loss (MBL) was 1.45 ± 1.41 mm, measured relative to the implant shoulder. Multivariate linear regression identified older age (β = +0.040; = 0.012) and mandibular implant placement (β = +1.39; = 0.007) as significant predictors of greater bone loss. Wedge-shaped implants demonstrated high long-term survival and stable marginal bone levels in narrow ridges without the need for bone augmentation. Age and mandibular location negatively influenced long-term bone stability, while smoking, gender, and history of periodontitis were not significant predictors.

摘要

楔形种植体已被提议作为一种针对狭窄牙槽嵴的微创解决方案,旨在避免骨增量手术。虽然短期结果令人鼓舞,但长期临床证据仍然有限。这项多中心前瞻性单臂队列研究报告了在水平萎缩性牙槽嵴(平均厚度3.73±0.36毫米)中未进行植骨植入的组织水平楔形种植体(厚度1.8毫米)的7年随访结果。对45颗种植体(34例患者)进行了临床和影像学评估。在加载后7年的随访中,种植体存活率为95.5%,记录到两例失败——一例早期脱落和一例因种植体周围炎。5颗种植体(11.4%)观察到种植体周围黏膜炎,3颗种植体(6.8%)诊断为种植体周围炎。未报告机械并发症。相对于种植体肩部测量,平均边缘骨吸收(MBL)为1.45±1.41毫米。多变量线性回归确定年龄较大(β=+0.040;P=0.012)和下颌种植体植入(β=+1.39;P=0.007)是骨吸收增加的显著预测因素。楔形种植体在狭窄牙槽嵴中显示出高长期存活率和稳定的边缘骨水平,无需进行骨增量手术。年龄和下颌位置对长期骨稳定性有负面影响,而吸烟、性别和牙周炎病史不是显著的预测因素。

相似文献

1
Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Wedge-Shaped Implants Inserted in Narrow Ridges: A 7-Year Follow-Up Multicenter Prospective Single-Arm Cohort Study.植入窄牙槽嵴的楔形种植体的长期临床结果:一项7年随访的多中心前瞻性单臂队列研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Sep 6;14(17):6299. doi: 10.3390/jcm14176299.
2
Effect of allograft and xenograft ridge preservation on dental implant outcomes: A retrospective cohort study.
J Periodontol. 2025 Jul 29. doi: 10.1002/JPER.24-0852.
3
Outcome of implant therapy in patients with previous tooth loss due to periodontitis.既往因牙周炎导致牙齿缺失患者的种植治疗效果。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Oct;17 Suppl 2:104-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01347.x.
4
A novel polycaprolactone mesh for buccal bone augmentation with simultaneous implant placement: A feasibility report of three cases.一种用于颊侧骨增量并同期植入种植体的新型聚己内酯网片:三例可行性报告
Clin Adv Periodontics. 2025 Aug 21. doi: 10.1002/cap.70007.
5
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development.缺失牙修复干预措施:用于牙种植位点开发的牙槽嵴保存技术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 28;2015(5):CD010176. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010176.pub2.
6
Retrospective Comparative Analysis of Peri-Implant Grayscale Values and Marginal Bone Levels in Ultra-short Implants (5.2mm) Placed in Native Bone Versus Standard-Length Implants (>8mm) in Augmented Sites.超短种植体(5.2毫米)植入天然骨与标准长度种植体(>8毫米)植入增量部位的种植体周围灰度值和边缘骨水平的回顾性比较分析
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2025 Jun 24;0(0):1-26. doi: 10.11607/jomi.11384.
7
Clinical Implications of Mandibular Symphysis Block Graft for Dental Implants: A 10-year Long Term Prospective Observational Study.下颌联合部块状骨移植用于牙种植的临床意义:一项为期10年的长期前瞻性观察研究
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2025 Aug;24(4):962-970. doi: 10.1007/s12663-025-02607-z. Epub 2025 May 28.
8
Adjunctive antimicrobial photodynamic therapy for treating periodontal and peri-implant diseases.辅助抗菌光动力疗法治疗牙周病和种植体周围病。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 12;7(7):CD011778. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011778.pub2.
9
Effectiveness of Implant Therapy in Patients With and Without a History of Periodontitis: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies.有或无牙周炎病史患者的种植治疗效果:前瞻性队列研究的系统评价与Meta分析
J Periodontal Res. 2024 Oct 28. doi: 10.1111/jre.13351.
10
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus.缺失牙修复干预措施:上颌窦增量手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 13;2014(5):CD008397. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008397.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Accuracy of digital versus conventional implant impressions in partially dentate patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.部分牙列缺损患者中数字化与传统种植印模的准确性:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Dent. 2025 Sep;160:105918. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105918. Epub 2025 Jun 17.
2
The prevalence of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis based on the world workshop criteria: A systematic review and meta-analysis.基于世界研讨会标准的种植体周围黏膜炎和种植体周围炎患病率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Dent. 2025 Sep;160:105914. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105914. Epub 2025 Jun 14.
3
Systematic review and meta-analysis on marginal bone loss of dental implants placed in augmented or pristine bone sites: Findings from clinical long-term studies.
关于种植于增量骨或原始骨部位的牙种植体边缘骨丢失的系统评价和荟萃分析:来自临床长期研究的结果
J Dent. 2025 Jul;158:105808. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105808. Epub 2025 May 6.
4
Biomechanical Basis for Bone Healing and Osseointegration of Implants in Sinus Grafts.窦提升植骨术中骨愈合及种植体骨结合的生物力学基础
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Feb;27(1):e13424. doi: 10.1111/cid.13424. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
5
Factors affecting radiographic marginal bone resorption at dental implants in function for at least 5 years: A multicenter retrospective study.功能至少 5 年的牙种植体放射影像学边缘骨吸收的影响因素:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024 Nov;35(11):1406-1417. doi: 10.1111/clr.14327. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
6
Usefulness of Wedge-Shaped Implants in the Full-Arch Rehabilitation of Severe Maxillary Atrophy: A Case Report.楔形种植体在上颌骨严重萎缩全颌重建中的应用:一例报告。
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2024 May 24;44(3):347-355. doi: 10.11607/prd.6453. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
7
Bone Remodeling and Bone Loss Around Subcrestal Implants: Two Distinct Entities.骨改建与骨量减少:种植体周围骨的两种不同表现。
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2023 Aug 10;43(4):410-411. doi: 10.11607/prd.2023.4.e.
8
Influence of buccal and palatal bone thickness on post-surgical marginal bone changes around implants placed in posterior maxilla: a multi-centre prospective study.颊侧和腭侧骨厚度对种植体植入后上颌后部边缘骨变化的影响:一项多中心前瞻性研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 May 22;23(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02991-3.
9
Changes in implant stability using different site preparation techniques: Osseodensification drills versus piezoelectric surgery. A multi-center prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.不同种植体预备技术对种植体稳定性的影响:骨密实化钻与超声骨刀。一项多中心前瞻性随机对照临床试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2023 Feb;25(1):133-140. doi: 10.1111/cid.13140. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
10
Wedge Shaped vs Round Implants: Bone Strain During the Insertion Process.楔形植入物与圆形植入物:植入过程中的骨应变。
J Oral Implantol. 2022 Dec 1;48(6):557-561. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-21-00135.