Bolbocean Corneliu, van Dommelen Paula, O'Neill Stephen, van der Pal Sylvia
Nuffield Department of Population Health Care Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Qual Life Res. 2025 Sep 13. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-04024-8.
Very preterm (VP, < 32 weeks gestation) birth and very low birth weight (VLBW, < 1500 g) are distinct but overlapping risk factors with different clinical implications. We aimed to investigate the separate and combined impacts of being born VP and/or VLBW on health-related quality of life in early and mid-adulthood.
We analyzed data from the Dutch Project on Preterm and Small-for-gestational-age infants (POPS), a national prospective cohort of individuals born in 1983. Participants were categorized into three groups: (1) VP & VLBW, (2) VP-only, and (3) VLBW-only. We used the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 at ages 19 and 28, and the Short Form 6-Dimension at age 35 to assess multi-attribute utility (MAU) scores and domain-level functioning. Adjusted linear regression models were used, controlling for covariates and employing inverse probability weighting to account for attrition.
Overall MAU scores did not consistently differ between the exposure groups and the VP & VLBW reference group at any time point. However, specific domain-level differences emerged in early adulthood. At 19 years, the VLBW-only group reported significantly better speech functioning (β = 0.11, p = 0.01). At 28 years, the VP-only group had better hearing (β = 0.05, p = 0.04), while the VLBW-only group had worse ambulation (β = - 0.12, p < 0.01). By 35 years, these inter-group differences were no longer statistically significant. Female sex was a consistent predictor of poorer outcomes in several domains by age 35. Attrition-weighted models produced nearly identical results.
VP and VLBW are not interchangeable risk categories. While overall HRQoL scores converged by mid-adulthood, distinct domain-specific and sex-based disparities were evident earlier in life. Our findings highlight the need for tailored interventions over a homogenous approach. Future research with consistent measures is required to confirm if this convergence persists over the life course.
极早产(VP,孕周<32周)和极低出生体重(VLBW,<1500g)是不同但有重叠的风险因素,具有不同的临床意义。我们旨在研究极早产和/或极低出生体重对成年早期和中期健康相关生活质量的单独和综合影响。
我们分析了荷兰早产和小于胎龄儿项目(POPS)的数据,这是一个对1983年出生个体的全国性前瞻性队列研究。参与者被分为三组:(1)极早产且极低出生体重,(2)仅极早产,(3)仅极低出生体重。我们使用19岁和28岁时的健康效用指数Mark 3,以及35岁时的简式6维度量表来评估多属性效用(MAU)得分和领域水平功能。采用调整后的线性回归模型,控制协变量并采用逆概率加权法来处理失访问题。
在任何时间点,暴露组与极早产且极低出生体重参考组之间的总体MAU得分并无一致差异。然而,在成年早期出现了特定领域水平的差异。19岁时,仅极低出生体重组的言语功能显著更好(β=0.11,p=0.01)。28岁时,仅极早产组听力更好(β=0.05,p=0.04),而仅极低出生体重组的行走功能更差(β=-0.12,p<0.01)。到35岁时,这些组间差异不再具有统计学意义。女性在35岁时在几个领域中始终是较差结果的预测因素。加权失访模型产生了几乎相同的结果。
极早产和极低出生体重不是可互换的风险类别。虽然到成年中期总体健康相关生活质量得分趋于一致,但在生命早期明显存在特定领域和基于性别的差异。我们的研究结果强调了需要采取量身定制的干预措施而非统一方法。需要进行采用一致测量方法的未来研究,以确认这种趋同是否在整个生命过程中持续存在。