Takashima Kohei, Hitosugi Masahito, Yamamoto Masahito, Maruo Yoshihiro
Department of Legal Medicine, Shiga University of Medical Science, Tsukinowa, Seta, Otsu, Shiga, 520-2192, Japan.
Department of Pediatrics, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Shiga, 520-2192, Japan.
Matern Child Health J. 2025 Sep 13. doi: 10.1007/s10995-025-04162-y.
Perinatal palliative care, defined as support for creating birth plans that include treatment and care decisions, is crucial for families facing life-threatening fetal conditions. However, the variability in medical resources across communities necessitates the development of tailored, community-based perinatal palliative care systems that support shared decision-making through multidisciplinary care. This study uses child death review (CDR) data to examine the current status and challenges of perinatal palliative care delivery in regional communities, focusing on decision-making processes, care planning, and transition to home care. It also compares cases in which families selected comfort care with those choosing intensive care to explore differences in care processes and outcomes.
A retrospective cohort study was conducted using regional CDR data from children under 18 years who died in Shiga Prefecture, Japan, between 2018 and 2020. Data on children eligible for perinatal palliative care were primarily collected from perinatal centers and perinatal cooperative hospitals participating in the CDR.
Among 131 deaths, 19 involved life-threatening conditions considered for perinatal palliative care. Two lacked prenatal diagnoses, while 17 discussed care plans, including medical intervention options, and mode of delivery. Of these, 65% (11/17) chose comfort care, while 35% (6/17) opted for intensive care. A comparison between these groups showed that the comfort care group had a longer decision-making period (median, 29 vs. 9 days; p = 0.044). Decision support before birth, which included accurate information about fetal conditions, care planning options, and psychological support, was not provided by clinical psychologists or palliative care specialists. Of the 17, four patients were discharged home, and one died at home.
This study highlights the challenges of implementing perinatal palliative care in communities. The prolonged decision-making process associated with comfort care may reflect the significant psychological burden on families. Factors such as care plans influence family burden, emphasizing the need for individualized support. The absence of specialized support and low rates of transition to home care for end-of-life care are critical issue for improvement in community-based perinatal palliative care.
围产期姑息治疗被定义为支持制定包含治疗和护理决策的分娩计划,这对面临危及生命的胎儿状况的家庭至关重要。然而,各社区医疗资源的差异使得有必要开发量身定制的、基于社区的围产期姑息治疗系统,通过多学科护理支持共同决策。本研究利用儿童死亡审查(CDR)数据,研究地区社区围产期姑息治疗的现状和挑战,重点关注决策过程、护理计划以及向家庭护理的过渡。它还比较了家庭选择舒适护理和选择重症监护的案例,以探索护理过程和结果的差异。
采用回顾性队列研究,使用2018年至2020年期间在日本滋贺县死亡的18岁以下儿童的地区CDR数据。符合围产期姑息治疗条件的儿童数据主要从参与CDR的围产期中心和围产期合作医院收集。
在131例死亡病例中,19例涉及围产期姑息治疗考虑的危及生命的状况。2例缺乏产前诊断,而17例讨论了护理计划,包括医疗干预选项和分娩方式。其中,65%(11/17)选择舒适护理,35%(6/17)选择重症监护。两组之间的比较表明,舒适护理组的决策期更长(中位数,29天对9天;p = 0.044)。临床心理学家或姑息治疗专家未提供出生前的决策支持,其中包括有关胎儿状况、护理计划选项和心理支持的准确信息。在这17例中,4例患者出院回家,1例在家中死亡。
本研究凸显了在社区实施围产期姑息治疗的挑战。与舒适护理相关的决策过程延长可能反映了家庭的重大心理负担。护理计划等因素会影响家庭负担,强调需要个性化支持。缺乏专业支持以及临终护理向家庭护理的过渡率低是基于社区的围产期姑息治疗改善的关键问题。