Suppr超能文献

死亡证明:错误与干预措施

Death Certification: Errors and Interventions.

作者信息

Schuppener Leah M, Olson Kelly, Brooks Erin G

机构信息

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Madison, Wisconsin USA.

University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Madison, Wisconsin USA

出版信息

Clin Med Res. 2020 Mar;18(1):21-26. doi: 10.3121/cmr.2019.1496. Epub 2019 Oct 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Death certificates are legal documents containing critical information. Despite the importance of accurate certification, errors remain common. Estimates of error prevalence vary between studies, and error classification systems are often unclear. Relatively few studies have assessed the frequency at which death certification errors occur in US hospitals, and even fewer have attempted a standardized classification of errors based on their severity. In the current study, our objective was to evaluate the frequency of death certification errors at an academic center, implement a standardized method of categorizing error severity, and analyze sources of error to better identify ways to improve death certification accuracy.

DESIGN

We retrospectively reviewed the accuracy of cause and manner of death certification at our regional academic institution for 179 cases in which autopsy was performed between 2013-2016. We compared non-pathologist physician completed death certificates with the cause and manner of death ultimately determined at autopsy.

METHODS

Errors were classified via a 5-point scale of increasing error severity. Grades I-IIc were considered minor errors, while III-V were considered severe. Sources of error were analyzed.

RESULTS

In the majority of cases (85%), death certificates contained ≥ one error, with multiple errors (51%) being more common than single (33%). The most frequent error type was Grade 1 (53%), followed by Grade III (30%), and Grade IIb (18%). The more severe Grade IV errors were seen in 23% of cases; no Grade V errors were found. No amendments were made to any death certificates following finalization of autopsy results during the study period.

CONCLUSION

This study reaffirms the importance of autopsy and autopsy pathologists in ensuring accurate and complete death certification. It also suggests that death certification errors may be more frequent than previously reported. We propose a method by which death certification errors can be classified in terms of increasing severity. By understanding the types of errors occurring on death certificates, academic institutions can work to improve certification accuracy. Better clinician education, coordination with autopsy pathologists, and implementation of a systematic approach to ensuring concordance of death certificates with autopsy results is recommended.

摘要

目的

死亡证明是包含关键信息的法律文件。尽管准确认证很重要,但错误仍然很常见。不同研究对错误发生率的估计各不相同,而且错误分类系统往往不明确。相对较少的研究评估了美国医院死亡认证错误发生的频率,甚至更少的研究尝试根据错误的严重程度进行标准化分类。在本研究中,我们的目的是评估一所学术中心死亡认证错误的频率,实施一种对错误严重程度进行分类的标准化方法,并分析错误来源,以更好地确定提高死亡认证准确性的方法。

设计

我们回顾性地审查了2013年至2016年期间在我们地区学术机构进行尸检的179例病例的死因和死亡方式认证的准确性。我们将非病理科医生填写的死亡证明与尸检最终确定的死因和死亡方式进行了比较。

方法

通过一个错误严重程度递增的5分制对错误进行分类。I-IIc级被认为是小错误,而III-V级被认为是严重错误。对错误来源进行了分析。

结果

在大多数病例(85%)中,死亡证明包含≥1个错误,多个错误(51%)比单个错误(33%)更常见。最常见的错误类型是I级(53%),其次是III级(30%)和IIb级(18%)。23%的病例出现了更严重的IV级错误;未发现V级错误。在研究期间,尸检结果确定后,没有对任何死亡证明进行修改。

结论

本研究重申了尸检和尸检病理学家在确保准确和完整的死亡认证方面的重要性。它还表明,死亡认证错误可能比以前报道的更频繁。我们提出了一种根据严重程度递增对死亡认证错误进行分类的方法。通过了解死亡证明上出现的错误类型,学术机构可以努力提高认证准确性。建议加强临床医生教育,与尸检病理学家协调,并实施一种系统方法以确保死亡证明与尸检结果一致。

相似文献

1
Death Certification: Errors and Interventions.死亡证明:错误与干预措施
Clin Med Res. 2020 Mar;18(1):21-26. doi: 10.3121/cmr.2019.1496. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
2
Death certification errors at an academic institution.一所学术机构的死亡证明错误。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005 Nov;129(11):1476-9. doi: 10.5858/2005-129-1476-DCEAAA.
5
Death Certification Errors and the Effect on Mortality Statistics.死亡证明错误及其对死亡率统计的影响。
Public Health Rep. 2017 Nov/Dec;132(6):669-675. doi: 10.1177/0033354917736514. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
7
Evaluation of Errors on Death Certificates.死亡证明中的错误评估。
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2024 Jun 22;22(1):150-156. doi: 10.33314/jnhrc.v22i01.4941.
9
Autopsy Service Death Certificate Review.尸检服务死亡证明审查。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020 Sep 1;144(9):1092-1096. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2019-0452-OA.

引用本文的文献

8
SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Experience at an Academic Medical Examiner's Office.学术法医办公室的新型冠状病毒(COVID-19)相关情况
Acad Forensic Pathol. 2024 May 30;14(3):87-107. doi: 10.1177/19253621231224532. eCollection 2024 Sep.

本文引用的文献

3
Death Certification Errors and the Effect on Mortality Statistics.死亡证明错误及其对死亡率统计的影响。
Public Health Rep. 2017 Nov/Dec;132(6):669-675. doi: 10.1177/0033354917736514. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
6
Principles and Pitfalls: a Guide to Death Certification.原则与陷阱:死亡证明指南
Clin Med Res. 2015 Jun;13(2):74-82; quiz 83-4. doi: 10.3121/cmr.2015.1276.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验