Schuppener Leah M, Olson Kelly, Brooks Erin G
University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Madison, Wisconsin USA.
University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Madison, Wisconsin USA
Clin Med Res. 2020 Mar;18(1):21-26. doi: 10.3121/cmr.2019.1496. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
Death certificates are legal documents containing critical information. Despite the importance of accurate certification, errors remain common. Estimates of error prevalence vary between studies, and error classification systems are often unclear. Relatively few studies have assessed the frequency at which death certification errors occur in US hospitals, and even fewer have attempted a standardized classification of errors based on their severity. In the current study, our objective was to evaluate the frequency of death certification errors at an academic center, implement a standardized method of categorizing error severity, and analyze sources of error to better identify ways to improve death certification accuracy.
We retrospectively reviewed the accuracy of cause and manner of death certification at our regional academic institution for 179 cases in which autopsy was performed between 2013-2016. We compared non-pathologist physician completed death certificates with the cause and manner of death ultimately determined at autopsy.
Errors were classified via a 5-point scale of increasing error severity. Grades I-IIc were considered minor errors, while III-V were considered severe. Sources of error were analyzed.
In the majority of cases (85%), death certificates contained ≥ one error, with multiple errors (51%) being more common than single (33%). The most frequent error type was Grade 1 (53%), followed by Grade III (30%), and Grade IIb (18%). The more severe Grade IV errors were seen in 23% of cases; no Grade V errors were found. No amendments were made to any death certificates following finalization of autopsy results during the study period.
This study reaffirms the importance of autopsy and autopsy pathologists in ensuring accurate and complete death certification. It also suggests that death certification errors may be more frequent than previously reported. We propose a method by which death certification errors can be classified in terms of increasing severity. By understanding the types of errors occurring on death certificates, academic institutions can work to improve certification accuracy. Better clinician education, coordination with autopsy pathologists, and implementation of a systematic approach to ensuring concordance of death certificates with autopsy results is recommended.
死亡证明是包含关键信息的法律文件。尽管准确认证很重要,但错误仍然很常见。不同研究对错误发生率的估计各不相同,而且错误分类系统往往不明确。相对较少的研究评估了美国医院死亡认证错误发生的频率,甚至更少的研究尝试根据错误的严重程度进行标准化分类。在本研究中,我们的目的是评估一所学术中心死亡认证错误的频率,实施一种对错误严重程度进行分类的标准化方法,并分析错误来源,以更好地确定提高死亡认证准确性的方法。
我们回顾性地审查了2013年至2016年期间在我们地区学术机构进行尸检的179例病例的死因和死亡方式认证的准确性。我们将非病理科医生填写的死亡证明与尸检最终确定的死因和死亡方式进行了比较。
通过一个错误严重程度递增的5分制对错误进行分类。I-IIc级被认为是小错误,而III-V级被认为是严重错误。对错误来源进行了分析。
在大多数病例(85%)中,死亡证明包含≥1个错误,多个错误(51%)比单个错误(33%)更常见。最常见的错误类型是I级(53%),其次是III级(30%)和IIb级(18%)。23%的病例出现了更严重的IV级错误;未发现V级错误。在研究期间,尸检结果确定后,没有对任何死亡证明进行修改。
本研究重申了尸检和尸检病理学家在确保准确和完整的死亡认证方面的重要性。它还表明,死亡认证错误可能比以前报道的更频繁。我们提出了一种根据严重程度递增对死亡认证错误进行分类的方法。通过了解死亡证明上出现的错误类型,学术机构可以努力提高认证准确性。建议加强临床医生教育,与尸检病理学家协调,并实施一种系统方法以确保死亡证明与尸检结果一致。