Suppr超能文献

一项关于透明质酸与羟基磷灰石混合注射剂安全性和有效性的前瞻性、开放标签上市后研究。

A Prospective, Open-Label, Post Marketing Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of a Hyaluronic Acid and Calcium Hydroxyapatite Hybrid Injectable.

作者信息

Gritti Alessandro, Salomon Malka, Elmaleh Lea, Kerson Graeme, Schumacher Andrew

机构信息

Dr. Alessandro Gritti Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Brescia, Italy.

Allergan Aesthetics, an AbbVie Company, Lod, Israel.

出版信息

J Cosmet Dermatol. 2025 Sep;24(9):e70430. doi: 10.1111/jocd.70430.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

HA-CaHA is a hybrid injectable combining hyaluronic acid and calcium hydroxyapatite for dual-mode facial soft tissue augmentation. HA-CaHA-L includes 0.3% lidocaine HCL.

OBJECTIVE

This prospective, open-label study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of HA-CaHA for treating midface volume deficit.

METHODS

Adults rated Moderate to Severe on the Allergan Midface Volume Deficit Scale (MFVDS) received HA-CaHA (n = 110) or HA-CaHA-L (n = 30) in the cheek (primary injection region) and jawline (optional) areas, with optional touch-up 2 weeks later. Follow-up visits occurred at Months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12. The primary endpoint was the MFVDS responder rate (≥ 1-grade improvement from baseline) at Month 1. Secondary endpoints were the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) responder rates and change from baseline on FACE-Q Satisfaction with Cheeks and Satisfaction with Facial Appearance. Exploratory endpoints were the Allergan Cheek Smoothness Scale (ACSS) scores and 3D photo-based midface movement tracking. Safety was assessed throughout.

RESULTS

At Month 1, MFVDS responder rate was 82.8%, remaining high through Month 12. The GAIS responder rates were 98.5% (investigator-rated) and 91.8% (participant-rated) at Month 1, remaining high through Month 12. FACE-Q scores improved 33.3 (Cheeks) and 23.8 (Facial Appearance) points at Month 1, remaining high through Month 12. ACSS scores peaked at Months 3 (73.7%) and 6 (69.2%), with corresponding skin movement changes. Most participants (95.7%) experienced mild or moderate ISRs. The most common treatment-related AEs were injection site pain (11.4%), injection site mass (10.7%), and headache (7.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

HA-CaHA and HA-CaHA-L are effective and well-tolerated for midface soft tissue augmentation, lasting up to 1 year.

摘要

背景

HA-CaHA是一种将透明质酸和羟基磷灰石钙混合而成的可注射材料,用于双模式面部软组织填充。HA-CaHA-L含有0.3%的盐酸利多卡因。

目的

这项前瞻性、开放标签研究评估了HA-CaHA治疗中面部容积不足的有效性和安全性。

方法

在艾尔建中面部容积不足量表(MFVDS)上被评为中度至重度的成年人在脸颊(主要注射区域)和下颌缘(可选)区域接受HA-CaHA(n = 110)或HA-CaHA-L(n = 30)治疗,2周后可进行选择性补打。在第1、3、6、9和12个月进行随访。主要终点是第1个月时的MFVDS应答率(相对于基线改善≥1级)。次要终点是全球美学改善量表(GAIS)应答率以及FACE-Q脸颊满意度和面部外观满意度相对于基线的变化。探索性终点是艾尔建脸颊光滑度量表(ACSS)评分和基于3D照片的中面部运动跟踪。全程评估安全性。

结果

在第1个月时,MFVDS应答率为82.8%,到第12个月时仍保持较高水平。第1个月时GAIS应答率分别为98.5%(研究者评定)和91.8%(参与者评定),到第12个月时仍保持较高水平。第1个月时FACE-Q评分在脸颊方面提高了33.3分,在面部外观方面提高了23.8分,到第12个月时仍保持较高水平。ACSS评分在第3个月(73.7%)和第6个月(69.2%)达到峰值,同时伴有相应的皮肤运动变化。大多数参与者(95.7%)经历了轻度或中度的注射后反应。最常见的与治疗相关的不良事件是注射部位疼痛(11.4%)、注射部位肿块(10.7%)和头痛(7.1%)。

结论

HA-CaHA和HA-CaHA-L对于中面部软组织填充有效且耐受性良好,效果可持续长达1年。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/12dd/12434560/7264edb00bf4/JOCD-24-e70430-g005.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验