Scharzenberger Stormy, Humphreys John M, Rigney Columb, Freifeld Alexis, Stenfeldt Carolina, Arzt Jonathan
Foreign Animal Disease Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Plum Island Animal Disease Center (PIADC) and National Bio and Agro-Defense Facility (NBAF), Manhattan, KS, United States.
Transboundary Disease Analytics Unit, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Center for Epidemiology and Animal Health, Fort Collins, CO, United States.
Front Vet Sci. 2025 Aug 29;12:1651091. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1651091. eCollection 2025.
Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) can be transmitted during the incubation phase, before clinical detection, but the epidemiological consequences of this preclinical infectious period have not been fully assessed in cattle. Using experimental data derived from transmission studies performed , we parameterized a state-transition model and simulated FMDV outbreaks across three U.S. regions under varying durations of preclinical infectiousness. We evaluated multiple epidemiologic outcomes under both optimal (1 day after clinical onset) and suboptimal (4 days after clinical onset) detection scenarios. The modeled output demonstrated that even a single day of preclinical transmission significantly increased outbreak magnitude, spatial extent, and duration. These effects were magnified under suboptimal detection and when simulating low-virulence virus strains with prolonged preclinical phases. Optimal response consistently reduced outbreak severity, with greater mitigation observed in the Eastern and Central U.S. as the preclinical phase lengthened. Our findings demonstrate that omission of preclinical transmission from FMD models results in systematic underestimation of outbreak impacts. Incorporating incubation phase transmission is essential for realistic epidemic forecasting, effective preparedness planning, and region-specific response prioritization.
口蹄疫病毒(FMDV)可在潜伏期、临床检测之前传播,但这一临床前感染期在牛群中的流行病学后果尚未得到充分评估。利用来自进行的传播研究的实验数据,我们对一个状态转换模型进行了参数化,并模拟了在美国三个地区不同临床前感染持续时间下的口蹄疫病毒暴发情况。我们在最佳(临床发病后1天)和次优(临床发病后4天)检测方案下评估了多种流行病学结果。模型输出结果表明,即使临床前传播仅有一天,也会显著增加暴发规模、空间范围和持续时间。在次优检测以及模拟临床前期延长的低毒力病毒株时,这些影响会被放大。最佳应对措施始终能降低暴发的严重程度,在美国东部和中部地区,随着临床前期延长,缓解效果更为明显。我们的研究结果表明,在口蹄疫模型中忽略临床前传播会导致对暴发影响的系统性低估。纳入潜伏期传播对于实际的疫情预测、有效的防范规划以及针对特定地区的应对优先级设定至关重要。