Lyu Ling, Huang Yi-Ling, Huang Yu, Wu Ze-Yu, Ping Fan, Li Yu-Xiu
Department of Endocrinology, Key Laboratory of Endocrinology, Ministry of Health, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China.
World J Diabetes. 2025 Aug 15;16(8):106967. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i8.106967.
Maternal diabetes significantly increases the risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Traditional self-monitoring of blood glucose is often invasive and limited in its ability to capture glycemic variability. Flash continuous glucose monitoring (FCGM) offers a promising alternative; however, its reliability and correlation with biochemical markers such as hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and glycated albumin (GA) in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remain underexplored.
To evaluate the performance of the FreeStyle Libre H FCGM against plasma glucose and its correlations with HbA1c and GA.
This prospective observational study involved 152 pregnant women with GDM or T2DM, with intermittent collection of venous plasma glucose, HbA1c, GA, and concurrent FCGM data at regular intervals at a single center. Relationships were evaluated using restricted cubic spline and mixed-effects models. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to compare the ability of HbA1c and GA to detect suboptimal glycemic control.
Analysis of 507 FCGM-plasma glucose pairs revealed an overall mean absolute relative difference of 7.96%. Mean absolute relative differences were 9.22%, 7.75%, and 4.15% for low (3.5-4.4 mmol/L), medium (4.5-7.8 mmol/L), and high (7.9-13 mmol/L) glucose levels, respectively. Most values fell within zone A or zone B on the Clarke and Parkes Error Grids. Bland-Altman analysis indicated a slight underestimation by FCGM (-0.121 mmol/L). Restricted cubic spline analysis revealed significant linear or nonlinear associations between HbA1c/GA and mean glucose, time in range, time above range, and coefficient of variation, but not time below range. Both HbA1c and GA were influenced by gestational age and pregestational body mass index. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that HbA1c had comparable or superior performance to GA in detecting suboptimal glycemic control based on FCGM-derived thresholds.
The FCGM system served as a validated reference for evaluating glycemic markers in pregnant women with T2DM and GDM. HbA1c reliably assessed average glycemia, while GA provided complementary insight.
妊娠糖尿病会显著增加孕产妇及新生儿不良结局的风险。传统的血糖自我监测往往具有侵入性,且在捕捉血糖变异性方面能力有限。动态葡萄糖监测(FCGM)提供了一种有前景的替代方法;然而,在患有妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)和2型糖尿病(T2DM)的孕妇中,其可靠性以及与糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)和糖化白蛋白(GA)等生化标志物的相关性仍未得到充分研究。
评估FreeStyle Libre H FCGM相对于血浆葡萄糖的性能及其与HbA1c和GA的相关性。
这项前瞻性观察性研究纳入了152例患有GDM或T2DM的孕妇,在单一中心定期间歇性收集静脉血浆葡萄糖、HbA1c、GA以及同步的FCGM数据。使用受限立方样条和混合效应模型评估相关性。进行受试者工作特征曲线分析,以比较HbA1c和GA检测血糖控制不佳的能力。
对507对FCGM - 血浆葡萄糖数据的分析显示,总体平均绝对相对差异为7.96%。低(3.5 - 4.4 mmol/L)、中(4.5 - 7.8 mmol/L)、高(7.9 - 13 mmol/L)血糖水平的平均绝对相对差异分别为9.22%、7.75%和4.15%。大多数值落在克拉克和帕克斯误差网格的A区或B区。Bland - Altman分析表明FCGM存在轻微低估(-0.121 mmol/L)。受限立方样条分析显示,HbA1c/GA与平均血糖、血糖达标时间、血糖高于目标范围时间和变异系数之间存在显著的线性或非线性关联,但与血糖低于目标范围时间无关。HbA1c和GA均受孕周和孕前体重指数的影响。受试者工作特征分析表明,基于FCGM得出的阈值,HbA1c在检测血糖控制不佳方面的性能与GA相当或更优。
FCGM系统可作为评估T2DM和GDM孕妇血糖标志物的有效参考。HbA1c可可靠地评估平均血糖水平,而GA提供了补充信息。