Fang Yingying, Qi Lu, Wang Yu, Han Chunyu, Zhang Qian, Liu Xiaoyun, Liu Ju, Cheng Xiaoqiang, Li Yinjuan, Li Yan, Sun Mingli, Liu Long, Li Pu, Zhang Yingjuan, Liu Huijuan, Wang Xinghe
Department of Phase I Clinical Trial Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Aug 28;16:1631341. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1631341. eCollection 2025.
In this Phase I study, we aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetic bioequivalence and the safety of a nitroglycerin lingual spray (NLS) compared with US-approved Nitrolingual in healthy subjects.
Subjects (N = 56) were randomized 1:1 to receive one 96-mg NLS, US-approved Nitrolingual; safety was assessed for 11 days. Bioequivalence was evaluated using the average bioequivalence method to test whether the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric means (NLS vs. US-approved Nitrolingual) for the primary endpoints were within prespecified acceptable ranges (80%-125%).
After the single administration of NLS (test preparation vs. reference preparation) under fasting conditions, the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) of C, AUC, and were 108.08%, 108.20%, and 110.85%, respectively. For the primary metabolites of NLS (1, 2-GDN), the GMRs of C, AUC, were 107.68%, 102.28%, and 102.23%, respectively. Similarly, for another metabolite of NLS (1, 3-GDN), the GMRs of C, AUC, and were 106.56%, 102.05%, and 104.67%, respectively. All 90% CIs for the test/reference AUC ratio and C ratio were within the acceptable range (80%-125%) for BE, which met the requirements of bioequivalence. No serious adverse events (AEs) occurred, and all AEs were mild and transient.
The bioequivalence of NLS to US-approved Nitrolingual was demonstrated; the safety results of the two study drugs were also similar. These studies provided robust evidence of the pharmacokinetics similarity between NLS and US-approved originator Nitrolingual.
http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.html, identifier CTR20230675.
在本I期研究中,我们旨在评估硝酸甘油舌喷雾剂(NLS)与美国批准的硝酸甘油舌下喷雾剂(Nitrolingual)在健康受试者中的药代动力学生物等效性和安全性。
将受试者(N = 56)按1:1随机分组,分别接受一次96毫克的NLS或美国批准的Nitrolingual;对安全性进行了11天的评估。使用平均生物等效性方法评估生物等效性,以测试主要终点的几何均值(NLS与美国批准的Nitrolingual)的90%置信区间(CI)是否在预先指定的可接受范围内(80%-125%)。
在禁食条件下单次给予NLS(试验制剂与参比制剂)后,C、AUC和 的几何均值比(GMR)分别为108.08%、108.20%和110.85%。对于NLS的主要代谢物(1, 2-甘油二硝酸酯),C、AUC和 的GMR分别为107.68%、102.28%和102.23%。同样,对于NLS的另一种代谢物(1, 3-甘油二硝酸酯),C、AUC和 的GMR分别为106.56%、102.05%和104.67%。试验/参比AUC比和C比的所有90%CI均在生物等效性的可接受范围内(80%-125%),符合生物等效性要求。未发生严重不良事件(AE),所有AE均为轻度且短暂性的。
证明了NLS与美国批准的Nitrolingual具有生物等效性;两种研究药物的安全性结果也相似。这些研究为NLS与美国批准的原研Nitrolingual之间的药代动力学相似性提供了有力证据。
http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.html,标识符CTR20230675。