Thiagarajan Shivakumar, Rane Swapnil, Chandak Khusbhu, Gurukeerthi B, Kantamani Teja, Tuljapurkar Vidisha, Kumar Suman, Pantvaidya Gouri
Division of Head & Neck, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Dept. of Pathology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India.
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug;16(4):882-889. doi: 10.1007/s13193-024-02167-7. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
Deciding the right treatment strategy for patients with Bethesda 3 and 4 fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) reports may be challenging. The reported risk of malignancy (ROM) and those from high-volume institutes may not be identical. The cost of molecular testing and its unavailability for routine use limits its utility in decision-making. In this study, we included all patients diagnosed at our institute with Bethesda 3 and 4 thyroid nodules on FNAC between January 2012 and December 2021. We identified the risk of malignancy for these patients along with other factors that could help identify the possibility of malignancy in these thyroid nodules. We utilised the clinical (C), ultrasound features (U), and the Bethesda category (T) to derive the CUT score and derive a cut-off value beyond which malignancy could be predicted. A total of 359 patients were included in the study. The ROM for the Bethesda 3 thyroid nodule was 77.7% (167/215), and that for the Bethesda 4 thyroid nodule was 76.4% (110/144). On multivariate analysis, nodules taller than wider [0.006, 7.662 (1.806-32.5)], male gender [0.024, 2.359 (1.119-4.976)], and the presence of microcalcification [0.004, 2.328 (1.319-4.109)] were found to be significant for the presence of malignancy in the final histopathology. The CUT score > 8.875 was associated with malignancy in the final histopathology. Various clinical and radiological factors may be useful to identify the nodules harbouring malignancy and facilitate appropriate management. The rate of malignancy in Bethesda 3 and 4 nodules among those who underwent surgery in our cohort was higher.
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13193-024-02167-7.
对于细针穿刺细胞学(FNAC)报告为贝塞斯达3类和4类的患者,确定正确的治疗策略可能具有挑战性。报告的恶性风险(ROM)与高容量机构的风险可能并不相同。分子检测的成本及其无法常规使用限制了其在决策中的效用。在本研究中,我们纳入了2012年1月至2021年12月期间在我们机构经FNAC诊断为贝塞斯达3类和4类甲状腺结节的所有患者。我们确定了这些患者的恶性风险以及其他有助于识别这些甲状腺结节恶性可能性的因素。我们利用临床(C)、超声特征(U)和贝塞斯达分类(T)得出CUT评分,并得出一个临界值,超过该值可预测恶性肿瘤。本研究共纳入359例患者。贝塞斯达3类甲状腺结节的ROM为77.7%(167/215),贝塞斯达4类甲状腺结节的ROM为76.4%(110/144)。多因素分析显示,结节高大于宽[0.006,7.662(1.806 - 32.5)]、男性[0.024,2.359(1.119 - 4.976)]和存在微钙化[0.004,2.328(1.319 - 4.109)]在最终组织病理学中对恶性肿瘤的存在具有显著意义。CUT评分>8.875与最终组织病理学中的恶性肿瘤相关。各种临床和放射学因素可能有助于识别含有恶性肿瘤的结节并促进适当的管理。在我们队列中接受手术的患者中,贝塞斯达3类和4类结节的恶性率更高。
在线版本包含可在10.1007/s13193-024-02167-7获取的补充材料。