Okyere Joshua
Department of Allied Health Professions, Sport and Exercise, School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate Campus, UK.
Department of Population and Health, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2025 Sep 11;19:26323524251376029. doi: 10.1177/26323524251376029. eCollection 2025.
In Ghana, death and dying are not simply biomedical endpoints but are deeply rooted in cultural, spiritual, and communal ideologies. These beliefs shape how individuals and families perceive terminal illness, respond to end-of-life (EoL) trajectories, and interact with palliative care (PC) services. Unlike Western medical models that prioritize institutionalized and medicalized death, the Ghanaian perspective is influenced by communalism, ancestral continuity, and religious doctrines that emphasize divine healing and spiritual deliverance. This commentary examines how Ghanaian cultural norms, particularly the conception of good and bad death, the taboo surrounding discussions of dying, and the centrality of family in care decision-making, create both opportunities and challenges for PC and EoL care delivery. While spiritual beliefs offer coping mechanisms that foster resilience, they may also foster unrealistic expectations and delay the initiation of PC services, thereby undermining symptom management and psychosocial support. At the same time, the family's pivotal role in caregiving, decision-making, and bereavement provides a strong foundation for culturally sensitive PC models. The paper calls for healthcare providers and policymakers to develop family-centered and culturally congruent care frameworks, invest in community-based education to destigmatize PC, and integrate bereavement care into the continuum of support. Training providers in culturally competent communication and embedding PC into national health policy and curricula are also recommended.
在加纳,死亡并非仅仅是生物医学意义上的终点,而是深深植根于文化、精神和社区意识形态之中。这些观念塑造了个人和家庭对绝症的认知、对临终轨迹的反应以及与姑息治疗服务的互动方式。与优先考虑制度化和医学化死亡的西方医学模式不同,加纳人的观念受到社群主义、祖先延续性以及强调神圣治愈和精神解脱的宗教教义的影响。本评论探讨了加纳的文化规范,特别是对好坏死亡的观念、围绕死亡讨论的禁忌以及家庭在护理决策中的核心地位,如何为姑息治疗和临终护理的提供既创造了机遇,也带来了挑战。虽然精神信仰提供了培养复原力的应对机制,但它们也可能助长不切实际的期望并延迟姑息治疗服务的启动,从而破坏症状管理和心理社会支持。与此同时,家庭在护理、决策和丧亲之痛方面的关键作用为具有文化敏感性的姑息治疗模式提供了坚实基础。本文呼吁医疗保健提供者和政策制定者制定以家庭为中心且文化上一致的护理框架,投资于基于社区的教育以消除对姑息治疗的污名化,并将丧亲护理纳入持续支持体系。还建议培训提供者具备文化胜任力的沟通能力,并将姑息治疗纳入国家卫生政策和课程。