Loh Pei Yi, Shen Xuanrong Michael, Chou Siaw Meng, Chang You Xiang, Moorthy Vikaesh, Bin Abd Razak Hamid Rahmatullah
Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sengkang General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Ann Transl Med. 2025 Aug 31;13(4):44. doi: 10.21037/atm-24-223. Epub 2025 Aug 26.
Medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) has gained popularity for treating patients with medial knee osteoarthritis. Bicortical screw fixation is conventionally preferred, but its mechanical advantage over monocortical fixation remains elusive clinically, and may have additional symptomatic hardware risks. Our study aimed to quantify mechanical differences between monocortical and bicortical distal screws construct in MOWHTO. Twenty artificial composite tibiae were used, with 10 specimens per arm. The first arm underwent MOWHTO with bicortical screw fixation throughout; the second arm incorporated two monocortical distal locking screws. Mechanical properties of specimens were evaluated with static compressive load-bearing till failure and cyclic fatigue strength testing. For quasi-static compression testing, monocortical specimens had a median ultimate load of 2.60 [interquartile range (IQR)=0.12] kN [mean ± standard deviation (SD) =2.59±0.15 kN], comparable to the bicortical group [median (IQR) =2.64 (0.46) kN, mean ± SD =2.56±0.33 kN]. Cyclic fatigue strength testing also demonstrated comparable maximal loads tolerated by both monocortical [median (IQR) =1.28 (0.08) kN, mean ± SD =1.33±0.12 kN] and bicortical [median (IQR) =1.28 (0.00) kN, mean ± SD =1.28±0.06 kN] specimens, as well as median number of cycles attained before failure. Mann-Whitney-U tests showed no statistically significant difference for all measured outcomes between monocortical and bicortical groups (P>0.05). Our study found monocortical fixation of the two distal-most screws in MOWHTO mechanically non-inferior to bicortical fixation. This supports monocortical fixation as an alternative technique for distal screw placement in MOWHTO.
内侧开口楔形高位胫骨截骨术(MOWHTO)在治疗膝关节内侧骨关节炎患者方面越来越受欢迎。传统上更倾向于使用双皮质螺钉固定,但在临床上其相对于单皮质固定的机械优势仍不明确,并且可能存在额外的有症状的内植物风险。我们的研究旨在量化MOWHTO中最远端单皮质螺钉与双皮质螺钉结构之间的力学差异。使用了20根人工合成胫骨,每组10个标本。第一组全程采用双皮质螺钉固定进行MOWHTO;第二组采用两根单皮质远端锁定螺钉。通过静态压缩承重直至失效以及循环疲劳强度测试来评估标本的力学性能。对于准静态压缩测试,单皮质标本的中位极限载荷为2.60[四分位间距(IQR)=0.12]kN[均值±标准差(SD)=2.59±0.15 kN],与双皮质组相当[中位值(IQR)=2.64(0.46)kN,均值±SD =2.56±0.33 kN]。循环疲劳强度测试也表明,单皮质[中位值(IQR)=1.28(0.08)kN,均值±SD =1.33±0.12 kN]和双皮质[中位值(IQR)=1.28(0.00)kN,均值±SD =1.28±0.06 kN]标本所耐受的最大载荷以及失效前达到的中位循环次数相当。曼-惠特尼-乌检验显示,单皮质组和双皮质组之间所有测量结果均无统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。我们的研究发现,MOWHTO中最远端的两根螺钉采用单皮质固定在力学上并不逊于双皮质固定。这支持将单皮质固定作为MOWHTO中远端螺钉置入的替代技术。