• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心源性休克中的性别差异:拉丁美洲单一国家的危险因素、治疗强度和死亡率

Sex Disparities in Cardiogenic Shock: Risk Factors, Treatment Intensity, and Mortality in a Single Latin American Country.

作者信息

Arias-Mendoza Alexandra, González-Pacheco Héctor, Álvarez-Sangabriel Amada, Araiza-Garaygordobil Diego, Ramírez-Rangel Pamela, Gopar-Nieto Rodrigo, Del Carmen López-Rodríguez Maria, Sierra-Lara-Martínez Daniel, Mendoza-García Salvador, Díaz-Herrera Braiana Ángeles, Papaqui-Quitl María Nila, Hernández-Montfort Jaime, Ortega-Hernández Jorge A

机构信息

Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez, Coronary Care Unit, Juan Badiano 1, Sección XVI, Tlalpan 14080 Ciudad De México, México.

Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez, Heart Failure Clinic, Juan Badiano 1, Sección XVI, Tlalpan 14080 Ciudad De México, México.

出版信息

Glob Heart. 2025 Sep 9;20(1):78. doi: 10.5334/gh.1469. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.5334/gh.1469
PMID:40949693
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12427619/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiogenic shock (CS) carries a high in-hospital mortality, with limited data on sex-related disparities in Latin America. Women remain underrepresented in CS studies.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate sex-specific differences in characteristics, management, and mortality in acute myocardial infarction-related (AMI-CS) and non-AMI-CS in a large Latin-American cohort.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 9430 patients (5016 AMI-CS and 4414 non-AMI-CS) with SCAI-CSWG stages B-E in a reference center in Mexico City from 2005 to 2023. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Analyses included multivariable Cox models and propensity score matching (PSM).

RESULTS

Women with AMI-CS were older (67 vs. 60 years), had more hypertension (66% vs. 52%) and diabetes (53% vs. 38%), and received less primary reperfusion (62% vs. 71%) and mechanical circulatory support (11.6% vs. 14.7%) than men (all < 0.05). In non-AMI-CS, women were older (66 vs. 60 years), had more prior heart failure (33% vs. 24%), while men had more chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and prior MI (all < 0.05). Unadjusted mortality was higher in women in AMI-CS (24.6% vs. 16.3%, HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.28-1.72) and non-AMI-CS (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.05-1.32). After PSM, mortality differences were not significant in AMI-CS (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.00-1.48) or non-AMI-CS (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.92-1.24).

CONCLUSIONS

Women with CS in Latin America present with greater comorbidity and less aggressive/invasive management. While unadjusted mortality was higher in women, these differences were no longer significant after PSM, indicating that baseline factors and treatment disparities largely explain excess risk.

摘要

背景

心源性休克(CS)的院内死亡率很高,而拉丁美洲关于性别差异的数据有限。在CS研究中,女性的代表性仍然不足。

目的

评估拉丁美洲一个大型队列中急性心肌梗死相关心源性休克(AMI-CS)和非AMI-CS在特征、治疗和死亡率方面的性别差异。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2005年至2023年墨西哥城一家参考中心9430例处于SCAI-CSWG B-E期的患者(5016例AMI-CS和4414例非AMI-CS)。主要结局是院内死亡率。分析包括多变量Cox模型和倾向评分匹配(PSM)。

结果

AMI-CS女性患者年龄更大(67岁对60岁),高血压(66%对52%)和糖尿病(53%对38%)患病率更高,接受初级再灌注治疗(62%对71%)和机械循环支持治疗(11.6%对14.7%)的比例低于男性(均P<0.05)。在非AMI-CS中,女性年龄更大(66岁对60岁),既往有心力衰竭的比例更高(33%对24%),而男性慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和既往心肌梗死的比例更高(均P<0.05)。AMI-CS女性患者未经调整的死亡率更高(24.6%对16.3%,HR 1.48,95%CI 1.28-1.72),非AMI-CS女性患者也是如此(HR 1.18,95%CI 1.05-1.32)。PSM后,AMI-CS(HR 1.22,95%CI 1.00-1.48)或非AMI-CS(HR 1.07,95%CI 0.92-1.24)的死亡率差异无统计学意义。

结论

拉丁美洲患有CS的女性合并症更多,积极/侵入性治疗更少。虽然女性未经调整的死亡率更高,但PSM后这些差异不再显著,这表明基线因素和治疗差异在很大程度上解释了额外风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9818/12427619/060818e7587d/gh-20-1-1469-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9818/12427619/4df4fe71a3bc/gh-20-1-1469-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9818/12427619/d6d4300f873f/gh-20-1-1469-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9818/12427619/8871f0a351f2/gh-20-1-1469-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9818/12427619/5f1ef1c87f2f/gh-20-1-1469-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9818/12427619/060818e7587d/gh-20-1-1469-g4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9818/12427619/4df4fe71a3bc/gh-20-1-1469-g5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9818/12427619/d6d4300f873f/gh-20-1-1469-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9818/12427619/8871f0a351f2/gh-20-1-1469-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9818/12427619/5f1ef1c87f2f/gh-20-1-1469-g3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9818/12427619/060818e7587d/gh-20-1-1469-g4.jpg

相似文献

1
Sex Disparities in Cardiogenic Shock: Risk Factors, Treatment Intensity, and Mortality in a Single Latin American Country.心源性休克中的性别差异:拉丁美洲单一国家的危险因素、治疗强度和死亡率
Glob Heart. 2025 Sep 9;20(1):78. doi: 10.5334/gh.1469. eCollection 2025.
2
Outcomes of Patients Transferred to Tertiary Care Centers for Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock: A Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Analysis.因心原性休克转至三级医疗中心治疗的患者的结局:心原性休克工作组分析。
J Card Fail. 2024 Apr;30(4):564-575. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.09.003. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
3
Impact of pulmonary artery catheterization in patients with acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock.肺动脉导管插入术对急性心肌梗死心源性休克患者的影响。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2025 Sep;78:41-46. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.12.010. Epub 2025 Jan 11.
4
Gender disparity in morbidity and mortality among patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction due to spontaneous coronary artery dissection complicated by cardiogenic shock.自发性冠状动脉夹层并发心源性休克所致ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者发病和死亡的性别差异。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2025 Sep;78:23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.11.010. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
5
Outcomes of patients supported on Impella 5.5 for more than 14 days: A Cardiogenic Shock Working Group registry analysis.使用Impella 5.5支持超过14天的患者结局:心源性休克工作组注册研究分析
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2025 Jun 29. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2025.05.017.
6
COMPARISON OF THE PREDICTIVE PERFORMANCE OF CARDIOGENIC SHOCK SCORES IN A REAL-WORLD LATIN AMERICA COUNTRY.在一个真实世界的拉丁美洲国家中心源性休克评分预测性能的比较
Shock. 2023 Apr 1;59(4):576-582. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000002091. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
7
Sex differences in the presentation and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a critical review of contemporary data and a look towards future directions.急性心肌梗死合并心原性休克患者的临床表现和结局的性别差异:对当代数据的批判性回顾及对未来方向的展望。
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2024 Aug 1;30(4):344-353. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000001166. Epub 2024 May 27.
8
Sex-specific outcomes in acute myocardial infarction-associated cardiogenic shock treated with and without V-A ECMO: a retrospective German nationwide analysis from 2014 to 2018.2014年至2018年德国全国性回顾分析:急性心肌梗死相关性心源性休克接受或未接受静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合治疗的性别特异性结局
Heart Vessels. 2024 Dec 14. doi: 10.1007/s00380-024-02509-z.
9
Outcomes of catheter ablation in cardiac sarcoidosis patients with ventricular tachycardia: a propensity score-matched retrospective analysis.心脏结节病合并室性心动过速患者导管消融的结果:一项倾向评分匹配的回顾性分析
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025 Jan 9. doi: 10.1007/s10840-025-01986-0.
10
Inotropic agents and vasodilator strategies for the treatment of cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output syndrome.用于治疗心源性休克或低心输出量综合征的正性肌力药物和血管扩张剂策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 29;1(1):CD009669. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009669.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
2025 Concise Clinical Guidance: An ACC Expert Consensus Statement on the Evaluation and Management of Cardiogenic Shock: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Solution Set Oversight Committee.《2025简明临床指南:美国心脏病学会关于心源性休克评估与管理的专家共识声明:美国心脏病学会解决方案集监督委员会报告》
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025 Apr 29;85(16):1618-1641. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.02.018. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
2
Body Mass Index and Mortality in Cardiogenic Shock.体重指数与心源性休克患者的死亡率。
ASAIO J. 2024 Oct 1;70(10):885-891. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000002194. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
3
Sex-Related Differences in Patient Characteristics, Hemodynamics, and Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock: INOVA-SHOCK Registry.
心源性休克患者特征、血流动力学及预后的性别差异:INOVA休克注册研究
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Sep-Oct;2(5). doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.100978. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
4
Sex disparities in cardiogenic shock: Insights from the FRENSHOCK registry.心源性休克中的性别差异:来自FRESHOCK注册研究的见解。
J Crit Care. 2024 Aug;82:154785. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154785. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
5
Sex-related differences in patients presenting with heart failure-related cardiogenic shock.心力衰竭相关性心原性休克患者的性别差异。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2024 Apr;113(4):612-625. doi: 10.1007/s00392-024-02392-8. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
6
Impact of Female Sex on Cardiogenic Shock Outcomes: A Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Report.女性性别对心源性休克结局的影响:心源性休克工作组报告。
JACC Heart Fail. 2023 Dec;11(12):1742-1753. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.09.025. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
7
Sex and cardiogenic shock: Still no time for answers but for evidences.
Int J Cardiol. 2023 Nov 1;390:131224. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.131224. Epub 2023 Jul 29.
8
Cardiogenic shock in women - A review and call to action.女性心源性休克——综述与行动呼吁
Int J Cardiol. 2023 Sep 1;386:98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.05.005. Epub 2023 May 14.
9
Pulmonary Artery Catheter Use and Risk of In-hospital Death in Heart Failure Cardiogenic Shock.肺动脉导管使用与心力衰竭性心源性休克院内死亡风险。
J Card Fail. 2023 Sep;29(9):1234-1244. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.05.001. Epub 2023 May 13.
10
Clinical impact of pulmonary artery catheter in patients with cardiogenic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis.肺動脈導管在心原性休克患者中的臨床影響:系統評價和薈萃分析。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023 Oct;55:58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2023.04.008. Epub 2023 Apr 17.