• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肺动脉导管使用与心力衰竭性心源性休克院内死亡风险。

Pulmonary Artery Catheter Use and Risk of In-hospital Death in Heart Failure Cardiogenic Shock.

机构信息

Cardiovascular Institute at Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart and Vascular Institute, Kaufman Center for Heart Failure, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

出版信息

J Card Fail. 2023 Sep;29(9):1234-1244. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.05.001. Epub 2023 May 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.05.001
PMID:37187230
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary artery catheters (PACs) are increasingly used to guide management decisions in cardiogenic shock (CS). The goal of this study was to determine if PAC use was associated with a lower risk of in-hospital mortality in CS owing to acute heart failure (HF-CS).

METHODS AND RESULTS

This multicenter, retrospective, observational study included patients with CS hospitalized between 2019 and 2021 at 15 US hospitals participating in the Cardiogenic Shock Working Group registry. The primary end point was in-hospital mortality. Inverse probability of treatment-weighted logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI), accounting for multiple variables at admission. The association between the timing of PAC placement and in-hospital death was also analyzed. A total of 1055 patients with HF-CS were included, of whom 834 (79%) received a PAC during their hospitalization. In-hospital mortality risk for the cohort was 24.7% (n = 261). PAC use was associated with lower adjusted in-hospital mortality risk (22.2% vs 29.8%, OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.50-0.94). Similar associations were found across SCAI stages of shock, both at admission and at maximum SCAI stage during hospitalization. Early PAC use (≤6 hours of admission) was observed in 220 PAC recipients (26%) and associated with a lower adjusted risk of in-hospital mortality compared with delayed (≥48 hours) or no PAC use (17.3% vs 27.7%, OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.37-0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

This observational study supports PAC use, because it was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality in HF-CS, especially if performed within 6 hours of hospital admission.

CONDENSED ABSTRACT

An observational study from the Cardiogenic Shock Working Group registry of 1055 patients with HF-CS showed that pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) use was associated with a lower adjusted in-hospital mortality risk (22.2% vs 29.8%, odds ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval 0.50-0.94) compared with outcomes in patients managed without PAC. Early PAC use (≤6 hours of admission) was associated with a lower adjusted risk of in-hospital mortality compared with delayed (≥48 hours) or no PAC use (17.3% vs 27.7%, odds ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval 0.37-0.81).

摘要

背景

肺动脉导管(PAC)越来越多地用于指导心源性休克(CS)的治疗决策。本研究的目的是确定在急性心力衰竭(HF-CS)引起的心源性休克中,PAC 的使用是否与住院死亡率降低有关。

方法和结果

这是一项多中心、回顾性、观察性研究,纳入了 2019 年至 2021 年期间在参与心源性休克工作组注册研究的 15 家美国医院住院的 CS 患者。主要终点是住院死亡率。采用逆概率治疗加权逻辑回归模型来估计比值比(OR)和相应的 95%置信区间(CI),同时考虑入院时的多个变量。还分析了 PAC 放置时间与住院死亡之间的关系。共纳入 1055 例 HF-CS 患者,其中 834 例(79%)在住院期间接受了 PAC。该队列的住院死亡率为 24.7%(n=261)。PAC 使用与调整后住院死亡率降低相关(22.2% vs 29.8%,OR 0.68,95%CI 0.50-0.94)。在休克的 SCAI 各阶段,包括入院时和住院期间的最大 SCAI 阶段,均观察到类似的关联。在 220 名 PAC 使用者中(26%)观察到早期 PAC 使用(入院后≤6 小时),与延迟(≥48 小时)或不使用 PAC 相比,调整后的住院死亡率降低(17.3% vs 27.7%,OR 0.54,95%CI 0.37-0.81)。

结论

这项观察性研究支持 PAC 使用,因为它与 HF-CS 患者的住院死亡率降低有关,尤其是在入院后 6 小时内使用时。

相似文献

1
Pulmonary Artery Catheter Use and Risk of In-hospital Death in Heart Failure Cardiogenic Shock.肺动脉导管使用与心力衰竭性心源性休克院内死亡风险。
J Card Fail. 2023 Sep;29(9):1234-1244. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.05.001. Epub 2023 May 13.
2
Complete Hemodynamic Profiling With Pulmonary Artery Catheters in Cardiogenic Shock Is Associated With Lower In-Hospital Mortality.肺动脉导管进行完全血流动力学分析与心源性休克患者院内死亡率降低相关。
JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Nov;8(11):903-913. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2020.08.012.
3
Association of Hemometabolic Trajectory and Mortality: Insights From the Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Registry.血液代谢轨迹与死亡率的关联:来自心原性休克工作组注册研究的新见解。
J Card Fail. 2024 Oct;30(10):1196-1207. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.06.019.
4
INVASIVE HEMODYNAMIC MONITORING WITH PULMONARY ARTERY CATHETER IN SEPSIS-ASSOCIATED CARDIOGENIC SHOCK.在脓毒症相关性心源性休克中使用肺动脉导管进行有创血流动力学监测。
Shock. 2024 May 1;61(5):712-717. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000002290. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
5
Pulmonary artery catheter use in acute myocardial infarction-cardiogenic shock.肺动脉导管在急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克中的应用。
ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Jun;7(3):1234-1245. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12652. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
6
Clinical Presentation and In-Hospital Trajectory of Heart Failure and Cardiogenic Shock.心力衰竭和心源性休克的临床特征和住院过程。
JACC Heart Fail. 2023 Feb;11(2):176-187. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2022.10.002. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
7
Outcomes of Patients Transferred to Tertiary Care Centers for Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock: A Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Analysis.因心原性休克转至三级医疗中心治疗的患者的结局:心原性休克工作组分析。
J Card Fail. 2024 Apr;30(4):564-575. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.09.003. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
8
Current Use and Impact on 30-Day Mortality of Pulmonary Artery Catheter in Cardiogenic Shock Patients: Results From the CardShock Study.肺动脉导管在心源性休克患者中的使用现状及其对 30 天死亡率的影响:来自 CardShock 研究的结果。
J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;35(12):1426-1433. doi: 10.1177/0885066619828959. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
9
Trends in Utilization and Outcomes of Pulmonary Artery Catheterization in Heart Failure With and Without Cardiogenic Shock.心力衰竭伴或不伴心源性休克患者肺动脉导管使用及结局的变化趋势。
J Card Fail. 2019 May;25(5):364-371. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2019.03.004. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
10
Clinical impact of pulmonary artery catheter in patients with cardiogenic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis.肺動脈導管在心原性休克患者中的臨床影響:系統評價和薈萃分析。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023 Oct;55:58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2023.04.008. Epub 2023 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Sex Disparities in Cardiogenic Shock: Risk Factors, Treatment Intensity, and Mortality in a Single Latin American Country.心源性休克中的性别差异:拉丁美洲单一国家的危险因素、治疗强度和死亡率
Glob Heart. 2025 Sep 9;20(1):78. doi: 10.5334/gh.1469. eCollection 2025.
2
Use of a Pulmonary Artery Catheter in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.肺动脉导管在心源性休克患者中的应用——一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Circ Rep. 2025 Jul 8;7(8):589-598. doi: 10.1253/circrep.CR-25-0088. eCollection 2025 Aug 8.
3
Renal Dysfunction Across the Spectrum of Cardiogenic Shock: Mechanisms, Clinical Implications, and Therapeutic Strategies.
心源性休克各阶段的肾功能障碍:机制、临床意义及治疗策略
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2025 Jun 25;22(1):19. doi: 10.1007/s11897-025-00706-z.
4
Evolution of Critical Care Cardiology: An Update on Structure, Care Delivery, Training, and Research Paradigms: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.危重症心脏病学的发展:结构、护理提供、培训及研究范式的最新进展:美国心脏协会科学声明
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2025 Jul 29;86(4):291-313. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2025.02.002. Epub 2025 Apr 18.
5
Evolution of Critical Care Cardiology: An Update on Structure, Care Delivery, Training, and Research Paradigms: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.危重症心脏病学的发展:结构、护理提供、培训及研究范式的最新进展:美国心脏协会科学声明
Circulation. 2025 Mar 11;151(10):e687-e707. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001300. Epub 2025 Feb 13.
6
Advanced Markers for Hemodynamic Monitoring in Cardiogenic Shock and End-Stage Heart Failure: A Mini Review.心源性休克和终末期心力衰竭血流动力学监测的高级标志物:一篇综述
Heart Fail Rev. 2025 May;30(3):529-535. doi: 10.1007/s10741-025-10483-5. Epub 2025 Jan 14.
7
Sepsis-induced cardiogenic shock: controversies and evidence gaps in diagnosis and management.脓毒症诱导的心源性休克:诊断与治疗中的争议和证据空白
J Intensive Care. 2025 Jan 2;13(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40560-024-00770-y.
8
Cardiac power output associated with hospitalization and mortality in coronary artery disease patients at stage B heart failure.B期心力衰竭的冠心病患者住院及死亡率相关的心输出量
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024 Oct 4;55:101521. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101521. eCollection 2024 Dec.
9
The Management of Cardiogenic Shock From Diagnosis to Devices: A Narrative Review.从诊断到器械治疗的心源性休克管理:一篇叙述性综述
CHEST Crit Care. 2024 Jun;2(2). doi: 10.1016/j.chstcc.2024.100071. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
10
The management of heart failure cardiogenic shock: an international RAND appropriateness panel.心力衰竭性心原性休克的管理:一项国际 RAND 适宜性专家组研究。
Crit Care. 2024 Apr 2;28(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04884-5.