• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实体器官移植后成人PTLD一线治疗中R-EPOCH方案的回顾性评估

Retrospective evaluation of R-EPOCH in the frontline treatment of adult patients with PTLD after solid organ transplant.

作者信息

Cuzzo Brian, Ford Maegan, Jain Saagar, Cherng Hua-Jay, Orlando Evelyn, Gould Patrick, Song Amy, May Benjamin, Chen Yuxuan, Bhagat Govind, Lipsky Andrew H, Pro Barbara, Amengual Jennifer E

机构信息

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY.

Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Children's Hospital of New Jersey at Beth Israel Medical Center, Newark, NJ.

出版信息

Blood Neoplasia. 2025 Mar 10;2(2):100094. doi: 10.1016/j.bneo.2025.100094. eCollection 2025 May.

DOI:10.1016/j.bneo.2025.100094
PMID:40949773
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12423683/
Abstract

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) are rare complications of solid organ transplantation, which carry significant morbidity and mortality. Phase 2 trials that use sequential rituximab (R) followed by R, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) have become an acceptable approach for B-cell PTLD, although it carries a high risk of treatment-related mortality (up to 11%). Many aspects of B-cell PTLD biology and patient characteristics parallel AIDS-related lymphomas in which dose-modified R, etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin (DM-R-EPOCH) has been demonstrated to be highly efficacious and safe. In this single-institution retrospective study of (N = 101) adult transplant recipients with B-cell PTLD, 65 received DM-R-EPOCH, 8 received R-CHOP, and 17 received R monotherapy. Median progression-free and overall survival was 4.4 years and 6.4 years, respectively, for DM-R-EPOCH and 1 year and 1.1 years, respectively, for R-CHOP. Rates of neutropenia and infection were 70% and 77%, respectively, for DM-R-EPOCH, and 88% each for R-CHOP. Treatment-related mortality for patients treated with DM-R-EPOCH and R-CHOP was 4.7% and 25%, respectively. The median number of cycles of DM-R-EPOCH was 6, and between 73% and 89% of patients received a relative dose intensity of ≥80% for cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and doxorubicin. The relative dose intensity of vincristine was <80% in 56% of patients because of frequent omission for gastrointestinal involvement of PTLD. Collectively, these data suggest that DM-R-EPOCH does not lead to excessive toxicity in patients with B-cell PTLD and support the need for further prospective clinical studies.

摘要

移植后淋巴细胞增生性疾病(PTLD)是实体器官移植的罕见并发症,具有显著的发病率和死亡率。采用序贯利妥昔单抗(R)继以R、环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱和泼尼松(R-CHOP)的2期试验已成为治疗B细胞PTLD的一种可接受方法,尽管其具有较高的治疗相关死亡率风险(高达11%)。B细胞PTLD生物学和患者特征的许多方面与艾滋病相关淋巴瘤相似,在艾滋病相关淋巴瘤中,剂量调整的R、依托泊苷、泼尼松、长春新碱、环磷酰胺和多柔比星(DM-R-EPOCH)已被证明具有高度有效性和安全性。在这项对101例患有B细胞PTLD的成年移植受者的单机构回顾性研究中,65例接受DM-R-EPOCH治疗,8例接受R-CHOP治疗,17例接受R单药治疗。DM-R-EPOCH组的无进展生存期和总生存期的中位数分别为4.4年和6.4年,R-CHOP组分别为1年和1.1年。DM-R-EPOCH组的中性粒细胞减少率和感染率分别为70%和77%,R-CHOP组均为88%。接受DM-R-EPOCH和R-CHOP治疗的患者的治疗相关死亡率分别为4.7%和25%。DM-R-EPOCH的中位疗程数为6个,73%至89%的患者接受的环磷酰胺、依托泊苷和多柔比星的相对剂量强度≥80%。由于PTLD胃肠道受累导致频繁漏用,56%的患者长春新碱的相对剂量强度<80%。总体而言这些数据表明,DM-R-EPOCH不会导致B细胞PTLD患者出现过度毒性,并支持进一步进行前瞻性临床研究的必要性。

相似文献

1
Retrospective evaluation of R-EPOCH in the frontline treatment of adult patients with PTLD after solid organ transplant.实体器官移植后成人PTLD一线治疗中R-EPOCH方案的回顾性评估
Blood Neoplasia. 2025 Mar 10;2(2):100094. doi: 10.1016/j.bneo.2025.100094. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Front-line, dose-escalated immunochemotherapy is associated with a significant progression-free survival advantage in patients with double-hit lymphomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis.一线、剂量递增的免疫化疗与双打击淋巴瘤患者显著的无进展生存优势相关:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Haematol. 2015 Aug;170(4):504-14. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13463. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
4
Dose adjusted EPOCH-R is superior to RCHOP in frontline treatment of mediastinal large B cell lymphoma.剂量调整的EPOCH-R方案在纵隔大B细胞淋巴瘤一线治疗中优于RCHOP方案。
Hematology. 2025 Dec;30(1):2515337. doi: 10.1080/16078454.2025.2515337. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
5
Rituximab for the first-line treatment of stage III-IV follicular lymphoma (review of Technology Appraisal No. 110): a systematic review and economic evaluation.利妥昔单抗作为 III-IV 期滤泡性淋巴瘤的一线治疗药物(对技术评估第 110 号的回顾):一项系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(37):1-253, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta16370.
6
Comparison of first-line chemotherapy including escalated BEACOPP versus chemotherapy including ABVD for people with early unfavourable or advanced stage Hodgkin lymphoma.对早期预后不良或晚期霍奇金淋巴瘤患者,比较包括强化BEACOPP方案的一线化疗与包括ABVD方案的化疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 25;5(5):CD007941. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007941.pub3.
7
Sodium 2-Mercaptoethanesulfonate (MESNA), Ifosfamide, Mitoxantrone, and Etoposide (MINE) in Transplant-Ineligible Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Is the Old Regimen Still Gold?2-巯基乙烷磺酸钠(美司钠)、异环磷酰胺、米托蒽醌和依托泊苷(MINE方案)用于不符合移植条件的复发/难治性弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤:旧方案是否仍为最佳方案?
Cureus. 2025 Jul 1;17(7):e87128. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87128. eCollection 2025 Jul.
8
Treating newly diagnosed Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma in the elderly patient with R-mini-CHOP: A single centre analytical retrospective observational study.用R-mini-CHOP方案治疗老年新诊断弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤:一项单中心分析性回顾性观察研究。
Med J Malaysia. 2025 May;80(3):307-312.
9
DA-EPOCH-R improves the outcome over that of R-CHOP regimen for DLBCL patients below 60 years, GCB phenotype, and those with high-risk IPI, but not for double expressor lymphoma.DA-EPOCH-R 方案可改善 60 岁以下、生发中心 B 细胞型(GCB)表型和高危国际预后指数(IPI)的弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者的预后,但其对双表达淋巴瘤无效。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2019 Jan;145(1):117-127. doi: 10.1007/s00432-018-2771-9. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
10
Rituximab (MabThera) for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: systematic review and economic evaluation.利妥昔单抗(美罗华)治疗侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(37):iii, ix-xi, 1-82. doi: 10.3310/hta8370.

本文引用的文献

1
Ibrutinib as part of risk-stratified treatment for posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder: the phase 2 TIDaL trial.伊布替尼作为移植后淋巴增殖性疾病风险分层治疗的一部分:TIDaL 试验的 2 期研究。
Blood. 2024 Jul 25;144(4):392-401. doi: 10.1182/blood.2024023847.
2
How I treat posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder.我如何治疗移植后淋巴组织增生性疾病。
Blood. 2023 Oct 26;142(17):1426-1437. doi: 10.1182/blood.2023020075.
3
Post-transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD) in the US Population: Demographics, Treatment Characteristics, and Survival Analysis.
美国人群中的移植后淋巴细胞增生性疾病(PTLD):人口统计学、治疗特征及生存分析。
Cureus. 2023 May 31;15(5):e39777. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39777. eCollection 2023 May.
4
Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder: Update on treatment and novel therapies.移植后淋巴组织增生性疾病:治疗和新疗法的最新进展。
Br J Haematol. 2023 May;201(3):383-395. doi: 10.1111/bjh.18763. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
5
Modified risk-stratified sequential treatment (subcutaneous rituximab with or without chemotherapy) in B-cell Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) after Solid organ transplantation (SOT): the prospective multicentre phase II PTLD-2 trial.改良风险分层序贯治疗(皮下利妥昔单抗联合或不联合化疗)在实体器官移植后 B 细胞移植后淋巴增殖性疾病(PTLD)中的应用:前瞻性多中心 II 期 PTLD-2 试验。
Leukemia. 2022 Oct;36(10):2468-2478. doi: 10.1038/s41375-022-01667-1. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
6
The 5th edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours: Lymphoid Neoplasms.《世界卫生组织造血与淋巴组织肿瘤分类》第五版:淋巴肿瘤。
Leukemia. 2022 Jul;36(7):1720-1748. doi: 10.1038/s41375-022-01620-2. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
7
Incidence and outcomes of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease after 5365 solid-organ transplants over a 20-year period at two UK transplant centres.20 年间,在英国的两家移植中心的 5365 例实体器官移植后,发生了移植后淋巴组织增生性疾病的发病率和结果。
Br J Haematol. 2022 May;197(3):310-319. doi: 10.1111/bjh.18065. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
8
Clinicopathologic Characteristics, Treatment, and Outcomes of Post-transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorders: A Single-institution Experience Using 2017 WHO Diagnostic Criteria.移植后淋巴组织增生性疾病的临床病理特征、治疗及预后:一项采用2017年世界卫生组织诊断标准的单机构经验
Hemasphere. 2021 Sep 6;5(10):e640. doi: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000640. eCollection 2021 Oct.
9
Analysis of Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD) Outcomes with Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) Assessments-A Single Tertiary Referral Center Experience and Review of Literature.通过爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒(EBV)评估分析移植后淋巴细胞增生性疾病(PTLD)的预后——一家三级转诊中心的经验及文献综述
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Feb 21;13(4):899. doi: 10.3390/cancers13040899.
10
Cancer Risks in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: Results from a Comprehensive Analysis of 72 Cohort Studies.实体器官移植受者的癌症风险:72项队列研究的综合分析结果
Oncoimmunology. 2020 Nov 29;9(1):1848068. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2020.1848068.