• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1型糖尿病分子模拟触发的表位对候选物的结构同源性和静电势比较

Structural Homology and Electrostatic Potential Comparisons of Epitope Pair Candidates for Molecular Mimicry Triggering of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.

作者信息

Gardner Ryan, Wilkins Joshua, Mistry Sejal, Gouripeddi Ramkiran, Facelli Julio C

机构信息

Weber State University and University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Department of Biomedical Informatics.

出版信息

bioRxiv. 2025 Sep 4:2025.08.29.673145. doi: 10.1101/2025.08.29.673145.

DOI:10.1101/2025.08.29.673145
PMID:40950207
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12424643/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Molecular mimicry, where foreign and self-peptides contain similar epitopes, can induce autoimmune responses. Identifying potential molecular mimics and studying their properties is key to understanding the onset of autoimmune diseases such as type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Previous work identified pairs of infectious epitopes (E) and T1DM epitopes (E) that demonstrated sequence homology; however, structural homology was not considered. Correlating sequence homology with structural properties is important for translational investigation of potential molecular mimics. This work compares sequence homology with structural homology by calculating the structures and electrostatic potential surfaces of the epitope pairs identified in previous work from our laboratory.

RESULTS

For each pair of E and E, the root mean square deviations (RMSD) were calculated between their predicted structures and their electrostatic potentials. Structures were predicted using the AlphaFold software program. Of the 53 epitope pairs considered here, only 10 did not exhibit any matching (i.e. less than 3 residues overlap). When considering all residues the RMSD ranges from 0.33 Å to 11.66 Å with an average of 2.68 Å. Twenty-two pairs (42%) have RMSD of less than 1.5 Å and 30 (58%) less than 3 Å.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the E/E pairs selected by sequence homology show similar structural and electrostatic distributions, indicating that the E may also bind to the same protein targets, i.e. the major histocompatibility complex molecules, for T1DM, leading to molecular mimicry onset of the disease. These findings suggest that searching for epitope pairs using sequence homology, a much less computationally demanding approach, leads to strong candidates for molecular mimicry that should be considered for further study. But structure homology, electrostatic potential calculations and full docking calculations may be necessary to advance the in-silico molecular mimicry predictions, which may be useful to select the most promising candidates for experimental studies.

摘要

背景

分子模拟是指外来肽和自身肽含有相似表位,可诱导自身免疫反应。识别潜在的分子模拟物并研究其特性是理解诸如1型糖尿病(T1DM)等自身免疫性疾病发病机制的关键。先前的研究确定了具有序列同源性的感染性表位(E)和T1DM表位(E)对;然而,未考虑结构同源性。将序列同源性与结构特性相关联对于潜在分子模拟物的转化研究很重要。本研究通过计算我们实验室先前工作中确定的表位对的结构和静电势表面,比较了序列同源性与结构同源性。

结果

对于每对E和E,计算了它们预测结构之间以及静电势之间的均方根偏差(RMSD)。使用AlphaFold软件程序预测结构。在此考虑的53对表位对中,只有10对没有任何匹配(即重叠少于3个残基)。考虑所有残基时,RMSD范围为0.33 Å至11.66 Å,平均为2.68 Å。22对(42%)的RMSD小于1.5 Å,30对(58%)小于3 Å。

结论

通过序列同源性选择的大多数E/E对显示出相似的结构和静电分布,表明E也可能与T1DM的相同蛋白质靶点即主要组织相容性复合体分子结合,从而导致该疾病的分子模拟发病。这些发现表明,使用序列同源性搜索表位对是一种计算要求低得多的方法,可产生用于分子模拟的有力候选物,应考虑对其进行进一步研究。但可能需要结构同源性、静电势计算和完全对接计算来推进计算机模拟分子模拟预测,这可能有助于选择最有前景的候选物用于实验研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4371/12424643/a49e03cf0d7c/nihpp-2025.08.29.673145v1-f0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4371/12424643/dc9602680209/nihpp-2025.08.29.673145v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4371/12424643/0903aa4959f1/nihpp-2025.08.29.673145v1-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4371/12424643/a1a56dcb5470/nihpp-2025.08.29.673145v1-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4371/12424643/1d548545eff5/nihpp-2025.08.29.673145v1-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4371/12424643/679e10600022/nihpp-2025.08.29.673145v1-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4371/12424643/a35c780ca7b3/nihpp-2025.08.29.673145v1-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4371/12424643/2a8911b6d296/nihpp-2025.08.29.673145v1-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4371/12424643/56b31d18bf10/nihpp-2025.08.29.673145v1-f0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4371/12424643/1bc6204c4917/nihpp-2025.08.29.673145v1-f0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4371/12424643/a49e03cf0d7c/nihpp-2025.08.29.673145v1-f0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4371/12424643/dc9602680209/nihpp-2025.08.29.673145v1-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4371/12424643/0903aa4959f1/nihpp-2025.08.29.673145v1-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4371/12424643/a1a56dcb5470/nihpp-2025.08.29.673145v1-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4371/12424643/1d548545eff5/nihpp-2025.08.29.673145v1-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4371/12424643/679e10600022/nihpp-2025.08.29.673145v1-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4371/12424643/a35c780ca7b3/nihpp-2025.08.29.673145v1-f0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4371/12424643/2a8911b6d296/nihpp-2025.08.29.673145v1-f0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4371/12424643/56b31d18bf10/nihpp-2025.08.29.673145v1-f0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4371/12424643/1bc6204c4917/nihpp-2025.08.29.673145v1-f0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4371/12424643/a49e03cf0d7c/nihpp-2025.08.29.673145v1-f0010.jpg

相似文献

1
Structural Homology and Electrostatic Potential Comparisons of Epitope Pair Candidates for Molecular Mimicry Triggering of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.1型糖尿病分子模拟触发的表位对候选物的结构同源性和静电势比较
bioRxiv. 2025 Sep 4:2025.08.29.673145. doi: 10.1101/2025.08.29.673145.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
5
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
6
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
7
Aspects of Genetic Diversity, Host Specificity and Public Health Significance of Single-Celled Intestinal Parasites Commonly Observed in Humans and Mostly Referred to as 'Non-Pathogenic'.人类常见且大多被称为“非致病性”的单细胞肠道寄生虫的遗传多样性、宿主特异性及公共卫生意义
APMIS. 2025 Sep;133(9):e70036. doi: 10.1111/apm.70036.
8
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
9
The effect of sample site and collection procedure on identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection.样本采集部位和采集程序对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染鉴定的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 16;12(12):CD014780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014780.
10
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Prioritization of infectious epitopes for translational investigation in type 1 diabetes etiology.优先考虑 1 型糖尿病病因学中的感染表位进行转化研究。
J Autoimmun. 2023 Nov;140:103115. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2023.103115. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
2
Elucidating the Underlying Mechanisms of the Marked Increase in Childhood Type 1 Diabetes During the COVID-19 Pandemic-The Diabetes Pandemic.阐明2019冠状病毒病大流行期间儿童1型糖尿病显著增加的潜在机制——糖尿病大流行
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2321231. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.21231.
3
Sequential data mining of infection patterns as predictors for onset of type 1 diabetes in genetically at-risk individuals.
对感染模式进行序列数据挖掘,以预测遗传易感个体 1 型糖尿病的发病。
J Biomed Inform. 2023 Jun;142:104385. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104385. Epub 2023 May 9.
4
Mapping of antibody epitopes based on docking and homology modeling.基于对接和同源建模的抗体表位作图。
Proteins. 2023 Feb;91(2):171-182. doi: 10.1002/prot.26420. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
5
In silico design of recombinant multi-epitope vaccine against influenza A virus.针对甲型流感病毒的重组多表位疫苗的计算机设计。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2022 Feb 2;22(Suppl 14):617. doi: 10.1186/s12859-022-04581-6.
6
AlphaFold Protein Structure Database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models.AlphaFold 蛋白质结构数据库:用高精度模型极大地扩展蛋白质序列空间的结构覆盖范围。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2022 Jan 7;50(D1):D439-D444. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1061.
7
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold.利用 AlphaFold 进行高精度蛋白质结构预测。
Nature. 2021 Aug;596(7873):583-589. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2. Epub 2021 Jul 15.
8
In silico trial to test COVID-19 candidate vaccines: a case study with UISS platform.计算机模拟试验测试 COVID-19 候选疫苗:以 UISS 平台为例的研究。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2020 Dec 14;21(Suppl 17):527. doi: 10.1186/s12859-020-03872-0.
9
UCSF ChimeraX: Structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers.UCSF ChimeraX:面向研究人员、教育工作者和开发者的结构可视化工具。
Protein Sci. 2021 Jan;30(1):70-82. doi: 10.1002/pro.3943. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
10
Molecular mimicry and autoimmunity.分子模拟与自身免疫。
J Autoimmun. 2018 Dec;95:100-123. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2018.10.012. Epub 2018 Oct 26.