Wang Shijian, Lang Boxu, Mou Weiguang, Wang Yongjiu, Chen Xinxin, Lang Jiawang
Acupuncture and Massage Department, Putuo District People's Hospital Zhoushan 316100, Zhejiang, China.
Acupuncture and Massage Rehabilitation Department, Taizhou Municipal Hospital of Zhejiang Province Taizhou 318000, Zhejiang, China.
Am J Transl Res. 2025 Aug 15;17(8):6652-6662. doi: 10.62347/DIDZ9909. eCollection 2025.
To compare the effectiveness of combining trigger point acupuncture knife (TPAK) with Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) split-tendon massage therapy versus TPAK alone.
A retrospective study included 237 patients diagnosed with shoulder periarthritis. Of these, 114 patients received only TPAK therapy (TPAK Group), while 123 patients underwent a combination of TPAK and TCM split-tendon massage therapy (TPAK + TCM Group). Shoulder function was assessed using the Constant-Murley Score (CMS) and shoulder range of motion (ROM). Pain levels were evaluated using the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ). Psychological status, sleep quality, and overall quality of life were measured using the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire, both before and 3 months after treatment.
Both groups showed improvements across all outcomes, with the TPAK + TCM group showing significantly better results than the TPAK group. CMS scores revealed greater improvement in shoulder function and pain relief in the TPAK + TCM group, particularly in affective pain dimensions ( < 0.001). Additionally, the TPAK + TCM group exhibited greater reductions in anxiety and depression, as well as improvements in sleep quality and overall physical and psychological health (all < 0.05), compared to the TPAK group.
Combining TPAK with TCM split-tendon massage proved more effective than TPAK alone in treating shoulder periarthritis, improving function, reducing pain, enhancing psychological well-being, and improving sleep quality.
比较扳机点针刀(TPAK)联合中医分筋推拿疗法与单纯TPAK疗法的疗效。
一项回顾性研究纳入了237例被诊断为肩周炎的患者。其中,114例患者仅接受TPAK治疗(TPAK组),而123例患者接受TPAK与中医分筋推拿疗法联合治疗(TPAK + 中医组)。使用Constant-Murley评分(CMS)和肩关节活动范围(ROM)评估肩部功能。使用简化麦吉尔疼痛问卷(SF-MPQ)评估疼痛程度。在治疗前和治疗后3个月,使用世界卫生组织生活质量简表(WHOQOL-BREF)问卷测量心理状态、睡眠质量和总体生活质量。
两组在所有结局指标上均有改善,TPAK + 中医组的结果明显优于TPAK组。CMS评分显示,TPAK + 中医组在肩部功能改善和疼痛缓解方面更显著,尤其是在情感性疼痛维度上(<0.001)。此外,与TPAK组相比,TPAK + 中医组在焦虑和抑郁方面的减轻更为明显,睡眠质量以及总体身心健康也有改善(均<0.05)。
在治疗肩周炎、改善功能、减轻疼痛、增强心理健康和改善睡眠质量方面,TPAK联合中医分筋推拿疗法比单纯TPAK疗法更有效。