• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

INSPECT-SR:一种评估随机对照试验可信度的工具。

INSPECT-SR: a tool for assessing trustworthiness of randomised controlled trials.

作者信息

Wilkinson Jack, Heal Calvin, Flemyng Ella, Antoniou Georgios A, Aburrow Tony, Alfirevic Zarko, Avenell Alison, Barbour Virginia, Berghella Vincenzo, Bishop Dorothy V M, Bordewijk Esmée M, Brown Nicholas J L, Christopher Jana, Clarke Mike, Dahly Darren, Dennis Jane, Dicker Patrick, Dumville Jo, Grey Andrew, Grohmann Steph, Gurrin Lyle C, Hayden Jill A, Heathers James A J, Hunter Kylie E, Hussey Ian, Jung Lukas, Lam Emily, Lasserson Toby J, Lensen Sarah, Li Tianjing, Li Wentao, Liu Jianping, Loder Elizabeth, Lundh Andreas, Meyerowitz-Katz Gideon, Mol Ben W, Naudet Florian, Noel-Storr Anna, O'Connell Neil E, Parker Lisa, Redberg Rita F, Redman Barbara K, Richardson Rachel, Seidler Anna Lene, Sheldrick Kyle, Sydenham Emma, van Wely Madelon, Vorland Colby J, Wang Rui, Weibel Stephanie, Wjst Matthias, Bero Lisa, Kirkham Jamie J

机构信息

Centre for Biostatistics, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Faculty of Biology, Medicine, and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Cochrane Central Executive, London, UK.

出版信息

medRxiv. 2025 Sep 5:2025.09.03.25334905. doi: 10.1101/2025.09.03.25334905.

DOI:10.1101/2025.09.03.25334905
PMID:40950444
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12424918/
Abstract

The integrity of evidence synthesis is threatened by problematic randomised controlled trials (RCTs). These are RCTs where there are serious concerns about the trustworthiness of the data or findings. This could be due to research misconduct, including fraud, or due to honest critical errors. If these RCTs are not detected, they may be inadvertently included in systematic reviews and guidelines, potentially distorting their results. To address this problem, the INSPECT-SR (INveStigating ProblEmatic Clinical Trials in Systematic Reviews) tool has been developed to assess the trustworthiness of RCTs. This will allow problematic RCTs to be identified and excluded from systematic reviews. This paper describes the development of INSPECT-SR. The tool and an associated guidance document are presented.

摘要

存在问题的随机对照试验(RCT)会威胁证据综合的完整性。这些RCT在数据或研究结果的可信度方面存在严重问题。这可能是由于包括欺诈在内的研究不当行为,或者是由于诚实的严重错误。如果这些RCT未被发现,它们可能会被无意中纳入系统评价和指南中,从而可能扭曲其结果。为了解决这个问题,已经开发了INSPECT-SR(在系统评价中调查有问题的临床试验)工具来评估RCT的可信度。这将使有问题的RCT能够被识别并从系统评价中排除。本文描述了INSPECT-SR的开发过程。还介绍了该工具及相关指导文件。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63a7/12558052/b525fe5eca3a/nihpp-2025.09.03.25334905v3-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63a7/12558052/fcdc8e92fb8f/nihpp-2025.09.03.25334905v3-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63a7/12558052/b525fe5eca3a/nihpp-2025.09.03.25334905v3-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63a7/12558052/fcdc8e92fb8f/nihpp-2025.09.03.25334905v3-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63a7/12558052/b525fe5eca3a/nihpp-2025.09.03.25334905v3-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
INSPECT-SR: a tool for assessing trustworthiness of randomised controlled trials.INSPECT-SR:一种评估随机对照试验可信度的工具。
medRxiv. 2025 Sep 5:2025.09.03.25334905. doi: 10.1101/2025.09.03.25334905.
2
Assessing the feasibility and impact of clinical trial trustworthiness checks via an application to Cochrane Reviews: Stage 2 of the INSPECT-SR project.通过应用于Cochrane系统评价评估临床试验可信度检查的可行性和影响:INSPECT-SR项目的第二阶段
J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 May 9;184:111824. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111824.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
5
Treatment for women with postpartum iron deficiency anaemia.产后缺铁性贫血女性的治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 13;12(12):CD010861. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010861.pub3.
6
Interventions implemented through sporting organisations for promoting healthy behaviour or improving health outcomes.体育组织为促进健康行为或改善健康结果而实施的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 13;1(1):CD012170. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012170.pub2.
7
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
8
Perioperative oxygen therapy in patients undergoing surgical procedures: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.手术患者围手术期氧疗:系统评价和荟萃分析概述
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Sep;29(44):1-139. doi: 10.3310/TNTC4360.
9
Antioxidants for female subfertility.用于女性生育力低下的抗氧化剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 28;7(7):CD007807. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007807.pub3.
10
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.

本文引用的文献

1
Trustworthiness assessment as an inclusion criterion for systematic reviews-What is the impact on results?将可信度评估作为系统评价的纳入标准——对结果有何影响?
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2023 Dec 13;1(10):e12037. doi: 10.1002/cesm.12037. eCollection 2023 Dec.
2
Assessing the feasibility and impact of clinical trial trustworthiness checks via an application to Cochrane Reviews: Stage 2 of the INSPECT-SR project.通过应用于Cochrane系统评价评估临床试验可信度检查的可行性和影响:INSPECT-SR项目的第二阶段
J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 May 9;184:111824. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111824.
3
Investigating the impact of trial retractions on the healthcare evidence ecosystem (VITALITY Study I): retrospective cohort study.
调查试验撤稿对医疗证据生态系统的影响(活力研究I):回顾性队列研究
BMJ. 2025 Apr 23;389:e082068. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-082068.
4
How should we assess trustworthiness of randomized controlled trials?我们应如何评估随机对照试验的可信度?
J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Apr;180:111670. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111670. Epub 2025 Jan 13.
5
A survey of experts to identify methods to detect problematic studies: stage 1 of the INveStigating ProblEmatic Clinical Trials in Systematic Reviews project.一项识别有问题研究检测方法的专家调查:系统评价中调查有问题临床试验项目的第1阶段
J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Nov;175:111512. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111512. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
6
Automation of systematic reviews of biomedical literature: a scoping review of studies indexed in PubMed.生物医学文献系统评价自动化:PubMed 索引研究的范围综述。
Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 8;13(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02592-3.
7
Ivermectin for COVID-19 in adults in the community (PRINCIPLE): An open, randomised, controlled, adaptive platform trial of short- and longer-term outcomes.伊维菌素治疗社区成人 COVID-19(PRINCIPLE):一项短期和长期结局的开放、随机、对照、适应性平台试验。
J Infect. 2024 Apr;88(4):106130. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2024.106130. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
8
Checklist to assess Trustworthiness in RAndomised Controlled Trials (TRACT checklist): concept proposal and pilot.评估随机对照试验可信度的清单(TRACT清单):概念提案与试点。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2023 Jun 20;8(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s41073-023-00130-8.
9
Effect of Higher-Dose Ivermectin for 6 Days vs Placebo on Time to Sustained Recovery in Outpatients With COVID-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial.6 天高剂量伊维菌素对比安慰剂对 COVID-19 门诊患者持续康复时间的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2023 Mar 21;329(11):888-897. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.1650.
10
The power of weak signals: how systematic reviews direct researchers away from potentially biased primary studies.微弱信号的力量:系统评价如何引导研究人员远离可能存在偏差的原始研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 24;11(11):ED000160. doi: 10.1002/14651858.ED000160.