• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日间患者主动治疗的成本效益分析,一项跨学科疼痛自我管理项目。

Cost-effectiveness analysis of active day patient treatment, an interdisciplinary pain self-management program.

作者信息

Chowdhury Anonnya Rizwana, Schofield Deborah, Shrestha Rupendra, Nicholas Michael

机构信息

Pain Management Research Institute, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Centre for Economic Impacts of Genomic Medicine (GenIMPACT), Macquarie Business School, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Pain Rep. 2025 Sep 10;10(5):e1306. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001306. eCollection 2025 Oct.

DOI:10.1097/PR9.0000000000001306
PMID:40950549
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12425064/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Active day patient treatment (ADAPT) is an interdisciplinary, multimodal pain management program for patients with disabling chronic pain at the Pain Management & Research Centre (PMRC), Royal North Shore Hospital in Sydney, Australia.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to analyse the cost-effectiveness of ADAPT using hospital administrative and patient reported >12-month follow-up data. Patients' preprogram labour force participation, health care utilization costs, and quality of life outcomes were compared with outcomes >12 months after participating the program.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 61 patients who completed ADAPT (including follow-up) between 2014 and 2017 at the PMRC. Primary outcome measures were labour force participation in patients' average weekly earnings (n = 61) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICERs) (n = 53) based on the health utility score derived from assessment of quality of life (AQoL-8D). Pain-related health care utilization and costs before and >12 months after the program were assessed to calculate the ICER.

RESULTS

We estimated patients were earning $628.99 per week at >12 month after participating in ADAPT comparing to $539.54 at baseline. The ICER was $20,228.76 (95% CI: $14,176.25-$27,826.33) per quality adjusted life years gained.

CONCLUSION

Results from this study indicated that, patients with chronic pain >12 months after participating in ADAPT reported higher quality of life scores along with reduced health care utilization costs. However, more robust and exhaustive studies, especially prospective studies, are required to confirm these findings.

摘要

引言

主动日间患者治疗(ADAPT)是澳大利亚悉尼皇家北岸医院疼痛管理与研究中心(PMRC)为患有致残性慢性疼痛的患者开展的一项跨学科、多模式疼痛管理项目。

目的

本研究旨在利用医院管理数据和患者报告的12个月以上随访数据,分析ADAPT的成本效益。将患者参与项目前的劳动力参与情况、医疗保健利用成本和生活质量结果与参与项目12个月后的结果进行比较。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2014年至2017年间在PMRC完成ADAPT(包括随访)的61名患者。主要结局指标包括患者平均每周收入中的劳动力参与情况(n = 61),以及基于生活质量评估(AQoL - 8D)得出的健康效用得分计算的增量成本效益比(ICERs)(n = 53)。评估项目实施前和实施12个月后的疼痛相关医疗保健利用情况和成本,以计算ICER。

结果

我们估计,患者参与ADAPT 12个月后每周收入为628.99美元,而基线时为539.54美元。每获得一个质量调整生命年的ICER为20,228.76美元(95%可信区间:14,176.25美元 - 27,826. March 2023 33美元)。

结论

本研究结果表明,参与ADAPT 12个月后的慢性疼痛患者报告生活质量得分更高,同时医疗保健利用成本降低。然而,需要更有力和详尽的研究,尤其是前瞻性研究,以证实这些发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63b4/12425064/17b0ccefcce7/painreports-10-e1306-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63b4/12425064/3c667ddb042f/painreports-10-e1306-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63b4/12425064/26fa4e69426d/painreports-10-e1306-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63b4/12425064/17b0ccefcce7/painreports-10-e1306-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63b4/12425064/3c667ddb042f/painreports-10-e1306-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63b4/12425064/26fa4e69426d/painreports-10-e1306-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/63b4/12425064/17b0ccefcce7/painreports-10-e1306-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of active day patient treatment, an interdisciplinary pain self-management program.日间患者主动治疗的成本效益分析,一项跨学科疼痛自我管理项目。
Pain Rep. 2025 Sep 10;10(5):e1306. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001306. eCollection 2025 Oct.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Outcomes of specialist physiotherapy for functional motor disorder: the Physio4FMD RCT.功能性运动障碍专科物理治疗的效果:Physio4FMD随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(34):1-28. doi: 10.3310/MKAC9495.
4
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
5
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of enzyme replacement therapy for Gaucher's disease: a systematic review.戈谢病酶替代疗法的临床疗效和成本效益:一项系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul;10(24):iii-iv, ix-136. doi: 10.3310/hta10240.
6
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.卡莫司汀植入剂与替莫唑胺治疗新诊断的高级别胶质瘤的有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450.
7
Invasive urodynamic investigations in the management of women with refractory overactive bladder symptoms: FUTURE, a superiority RCT and economic evaluation.侵入性尿动力学检查在难治性膀胱过度活动症女性患者管理中的应用:FUTURE,一项优效性随机对照试验及经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(27):1-139. doi: 10.3310/UKYW4923.
8
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
9
Intravenous magnesium sulphate and sotalol for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and economic evaluation.静脉注射硫酸镁和索他洛尔预防冠状动脉搭桥术后房颤:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Jun;12(28):iii-iv, ix-95. doi: 10.3310/hta12280.
10
Topotecan, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride and paclitaxel for second-line or subsequent treatment of advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.拓扑替康、聚乙二醇化脂质体盐酸多柔比星和紫杉醇用于晚期卵巢癌二线或后续治疗:一项系统评价和经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(9):1-132. iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10090.

本文引用的文献

1
Productivity outcomes from chronic pain management interventions in the working age population; a systematic review.工作年龄段人群慢性疼痛管理干预的生产力结果:系统评价。
Pain. 2024 Jun 1;165(6):1233-1246. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003149. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
2
Economic analysis of patient-related effects of an interdisciplinary pain self-management program.患者相关因素对跨学科疼痛自我管理项目效果的经济学分析。
Pain. 2023 Nov 1;164(11):2491-2500. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002959. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
3
Economic evaluation of the Target-D platform to match depression management to severity prognosis in primary care: A within-trial cost-utility analysis.
经济评估 Target-D 平台在初级保健中根据严重程度预测匹配抑郁管理的效果:一项试验内成本效益分析。
PLoS One. 2022 May 25;17(5):e0268948. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268948. eCollection 2022.
4
Cost-effectiveness of Multidisciplinary Interventions for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Narrative Review.多学科干预慢性下背痛的成本效益:叙述性综述。
Clin J Pain. 2021 Nov 22;38(3):197-207. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001009.
5
Longitudinal outcome evaluations of Interdisciplinary Multimodal Pain Treatment programmes for patients with chronic primary musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis.慢性原发性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的跨学科多模式疼痛治疗方案的纵向结局评估:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Pain. 2022 Feb;26(2):310-335. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1875. Epub 2021 Nov 5.
6
A Cost-effectiveness Analysis of an Internet-delivered Pain Management Program Delivered With Different Levels of Clinician Support: Results From a Randomised Controlled Trial.一种互联网疼痛管理方案的成本效益分析,该方案提供不同水平的临床医生支持:一项随机对照试验的结果。
J Pain. 2021 Mar;22(3):344-358. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2020.11.003. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
7
The (cost-)effectiveness and cost-utility of a novel integrative care initiative for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: the pragmatic trial protocol of Network Pain Rehabilitation Limburg.新型综合护理干预对慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的成本效果和成本效用:林堡网络疼痛康复实用试验方案。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Oct 1;18(1):320. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01569-9.
8
Reducing the use of opioids by patients with chronic pain: an effectiveness study with long-term follow-up.减少慢性疼痛患者使用阿片类药物:一项具有长期随访的有效性研究。
Pain. 2020 Mar;161(3):509-519. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001763.
9
A guided and unguided internet- and mobile-based intervention for chronic pain: health economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial.一种基于互联网和移动设备的指导和非指导干预慢性疼痛的方法:随机对照试验的同时进行健康经济学评价。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 9;9(4):e023390. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023390.
10
Cost-Effectiveness of a Team-Based Integrative Medicine Approach to the Treatment of Back Pain.基于团队的综合医学方法治疗背痛的成本效益
J Altern Complement Med. 2019 Mar;25(S1):S138-S146. doi: 10.1089/acm.2018.0503.