• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新型综合护理干预对慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的成本效果和成本效用:林堡网络疼痛康复实用试验方案。

The (cost-)effectiveness and cost-utility of a novel integrative care initiative for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: the pragmatic trial protocol of Network Pain Rehabilitation Limburg.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER Maastricht, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Centre of Expertise in Rehabilitation and Audiology, Adelante, Hoensbroek, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Oct 1;18(1):320. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01569-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12955-020-01569-9
PMID:33004059
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7528600/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rehabilitation care for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) is not optimally organized. The Network Pain Rehabilitation Limburg 2.0 (NPRL2.0) provides integrated care with a biopsychosocial approach and strives to improve the Quadruple Aim outcomes: pain-related disability of patients with CMP; experiences of care of patients with CMP; meaning in the work of healthcare professionals; and healthcare costs. Firstly, in this study, the effectiveness (with regard to the functioning and participation of patients) of primary care for patients with CMP will be assessed, comparing care organized following the NPRL2.0 procedure with usual care. Secondly, the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility with regard to health-related quality of life and healthcare costs will be assessed. And thirdly, the effect of duration of participation in a local network in primary care will be studied.

METHODS

In this pragmatic study, it is expected that two local networks with 105 patients will participate in the prospective cohort study and six local networks with 184 patients in the stepped-wedge based design. Healthcare professionals in the local networks will recruit patients.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

age ≥ 18 years; having CMP; willing to improve functioning despite pain; and adequate Dutch literacy.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

pregnancy; and having a treatable medical or psychiatric disease. Patients will complete questionnaires at baseline (T1), 3 months (T2), 6 months (T3), and 9 months (T4). Questionnaires at T1 and T4 will include the Pain Disability Index and Short Form Health Survey. Questionnaires at T1, T2, T3, and T4 will include the EQ-5D-5L, and iMTA Medical Consumption and Productivity Cost Questionnaires. Outcomes will be compared using linear mixed-model analysis and costs will be compared using bootstrapping methods.

DISCUSSION

NPRL2.0 is a multidimensional, complex intervention, executed in daily practice, and therefore needing a pragmatic study design. The current study will assess NPRL2.0 with respect to the Quadruple Aim outcomes: patient health and costs. This will provide more information on the (cost-) effectiveness of the organization of care in a network structure regarding patients with CMP. The other two Quadruple Aim outcomes will be examined alongside this study. Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register: NL7643. https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/7643 .

摘要

背景

慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛(CMP)患者的康复护理组织得不尽人意。Network Pain Rehabilitation Limburg 2.0(NPRL2.0)提供了一种生物心理社会方法的综合护理,并努力改善四重目标的结果:CMP 患者的疼痛相关残疾;CMP 患者的护理体验;医疗保健专业人员的工作意义;以及医疗保健成本。首先,在这项研究中,将评估初级保健对 CMP 患者的有效性(就患者的功能和参与而言),将 NPRL2.0 程序组织的护理与常规护理进行比较。其次,将评估与健康相关的生活质量和医疗保健成本方面的成本效益和成本效用。第三,将研究在初级保健中参与当地网络的持续时间的效果。

方法

在这项务实的研究中,预计将有两个各有 105 名患者的当地网络参与前瞻性队列研究,以及六个各有 184 名患者的当地网络参与基于阶梯式楔形设计的研究。当地网络中的医疗保健专业人员将招募患者。

纳入标准

年龄≥18 岁;患有 CMP;愿意在疼痛的情况下改善功能;以及有足够的荷兰语读写能力。

排除标准

怀孕;以及患有可治疗的医学或精神疾病。患者将在基线(T1)、3 个月(T2)、6 个月(T3)和 9 个月(T4)时完成问卷。T1 和 T4 的问卷将包括疼痛残疾指数和简明健康调查问卷。T1、T2、T3 和 T4 的问卷将包括 EQ-5D-5L 和 iMTA 医疗消费和生产力成本问卷。使用线性混合模型分析比较结果,使用自举法比较成本。

讨论

NPRL2.0 是一种多维、复杂的干预措施,在日常实践中执行,因此需要一个务实的研究设计。目前的研究将根据四重目标的结果评估 NPRL2.0:患者的健康和成本。这将为网络结构中针对 CMP 患者的护理组织提供更多有关(成本)有效性的信息。其他两个四重目标结果将与本研究一起进行检查。

试验注册

荷兰试验注册处:NL7643。https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/7643。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a2/7528600/332d7f22fb9b/12955_2020_1569_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a2/7528600/43fe62c3ea53/12955_2020_1569_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a2/7528600/c723a6efbd61/12955_2020_1569_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a2/7528600/332d7f22fb9b/12955_2020_1569_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a2/7528600/43fe62c3ea53/12955_2020_1569_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a2/7528600/c723a6efbd61/12955_2020_1569_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/58a2/7528600/332d7f22fb9b/12955_2020_1569_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The (cost-)effectiveness and cost-utility of a novel integrative care initiative for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: the pragmatic trial protocol of Network Pain Rehabilitation Limburg.新型综合护理干预对慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的成本效果和成本效用:林堡网络疼痛康复实用试验方案。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Oct 1;18(1):320. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01569-9.
2
Cost-effectiveness of 40-hour versus 100-hour vocational rehabilitation on work participation for workers on sick leave due to subacute or chronic musculoskeletal pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.针对因亚急性或慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛而休病假的工人,40小时与100小时职业康复对工作参与度的成本效益:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Jul 28;16:317. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0861-4.
3
Study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial on effectiveness of an outpatient multimodal rehabilitation program for adolescents with chronic musculoskeletal pain (2B Active).一项关于门诊多模式康复计划对慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛青少年有效性的多中心随机对照试验(2B 主动式)的研究方案。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jul 28;17:317. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1178-5.
4
Effects of nurse-led motivational interviewing of patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain in preparation of rehabilitation treatment (PREPARE) on societal participation, attendance level, and cost-effectiveness: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.护士主导的慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者康复治疗准备阶段动机性访谈(PREPARE)对社会参与度、参与率和成本效益的影响:一项随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2013 Apr 2;14:90. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-90.
5
Developing the Network Pain Rehabilitation Limburg: a feasibility study protocol.开发林堡网络疼痛康复:一项可行性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 27;9(6):e025962. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025962.
6
Study protocol of a prospective multicenter study comparing (cost-)effectiveness of a tailored interdisciplinary head and neck rehabilitation program to usual supportive care for patients treated with concomitant chemo- or bioradiotherapy.一项前瞻性多中心研究方案比较了针对接受同步放化疗治疗的患者的个体化跨学科头颈部康复计划与常规支持性护理的(成本)效果。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Jul 3;19(1):655. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5874-z.
7
Effectiveness, costs and cost-effectiveness of chiropractic care and physiotherapy compared with information and advice in the treatment of non-specific chronic low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.与信息及建议相比,脊椎按摩疗法和物理疗法在治疗非特异性慢性下腰痛中的有效性、成本及成本效益:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Dec 22;18(1):613. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2351-3.
8
Comparative effectiveness and economic evaluation of Chuna manual therapy for chronic neck pain: protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial.中医整脊手法治疗慢性颈痛的比较疗效与经济学评价:一项多中心随机对照试验方案
Trials. 2018 Nov 29;19(1):663. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3016-6.
9
Study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial to evaluate a referral strategy for axial spondyloarthritis in young primary care patients with chronic low back pain; an impact study.一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案,旨在评估针对患有慢性下腰痛的年轻初级保健患者的轴性脊柱关节炎转诊策略;一项影响研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jul 12;17:278. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1132-6.
10
Evaluation of the efficacy of an internet-based pain education and exercise program for chronic musculoskeletal pain in comparison with online self-management booklet: a protocol of a randomised controlled trial with assessor-blinded, 12-month follow-up, and economic evaluation.基于互联网的疼痛教育和运动方案治疗慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的疗效评估:与在线自我管理手册比较的随机对照试验方案,设评估者盲法,12 个月随访,及经济学评价。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jun 26;21(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03423-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of active day patient treatment, an interdisciplinary pain self-management program.日间患者主动治疗的成本效益分析,一项跨学科疼痛自我管理项目。
Pain Rep. 2025 Sep 10;10(5):e1306. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001306. eCollection 2025 Oct.
2
Time-motion analysis of external facilitation for implementing the Collaborative Chronic Care Model in general mental health clinics: Use of an interval-based data collection approach.在普通精神卫生诊所实施协作式慢性病照护模式的外部促进措施的时间-动作分析:基于间隔的数据收集方法的应用
Implement Res Pract. 2022 Apr 4;3:26334895221086275. doi: 10.1177/26334895221086275. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Time and Organizational Cost for Facilitating Implementation of Primary Care Mental Health Integration.促进初级保健心理健康整合实施的时间和组织成本。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Apr;35(4):1001-1010. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05537-y. Epub 2019 Dec 2.
2
Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain of 3-6-Month Duration Already Have Low Levels of Health-Related Quality of Life and Physical Activity.患有慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛 3-6 个月的患者已经存在较低的健康相关生活质量和身体活动水平。
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019 Aug 27;23(11):81. doi: 10.1007/s11916-019-0817-6.
3
Developing the Network Pain Rehabilitation Limburg: a feasibility study protocol.
开发林堡网络疼痛康复:一项可行性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jun 27;9(6):e025962. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025962.
4
Discriminative Validity of the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for Physical Therapists.物理治疗师疼痛态度和信念量表的鉴别效度。
Phys Ther. 2019 Mar 1;99(3):339-353. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzy139.
5
The interpretation of change score of the pain disability index after vocational rehabilitation is baseline dependent.职业康复后疼痛残疾指数变化分数的解释与基线有关。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Sep 14;16(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-1000-1.
6
Prevention and treatment of low back pain: evidence, challenges, and promising directions.预防和治疗下腰痛:证据、挑战和有前途的方向。
Lancet. 2018 Jun 9;391(10137):2368-2383. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30489-6. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
7
Update of the Dutch manual for costing studies in health care.《荷兰医疗保健成本研究手册》更新版
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 9;12(11):e0187477. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187477. eCollection 2017.
8
Behaviour change and self-management interventions in persistent low back pain.行为改变和自我管理干预在持续性腰痛中的应用。
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2016 Dec;30(6):994-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
9
Digital Support Interventions for the Self-Management of Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review.用于腰痛自我管理的数字支持干预措施:一项系统综述
J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 21;19(5):e179. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7290.
10
Strengthening health systems to provide rehabilitation services.加强卫生系统以提供康复服务。
Can J Occup Ther. 2017 Apr;84(2):72-73. doi: 10.1177/0008417417705853.