Stuhec Matej
Department of Pharmacology & Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Medical Faculty Maribor, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Ormoz's Psychiatric Hospital, Ormoz, Slovenia.
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 28;16:1677152. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1677152. eCollection 2025.
Pharmacotherapy of depression represents a significant challenge in the management of depression in primary care. Although effective treatments have been available, many patients are still not adequately managed. Clinical pharmacists represent one of the possible strategies in the management, although this practice is rarely seen outside the United Kingdom and the United States.
The aim of the case was to evaluate the impact of clinical pharmacist prescribers on depression treatment.
A longitudinal, observational, case-based medication review by a pharmacist prescriber was conducted for a 63-year-old Slovenian patient in a primary care ambulatory setting. The review included three structured medication review assessments performed by a clinical pharmacist prescriber at defined intervals: first observation, two months post-intervention, and six months after first observation. The pharmacists conducted medication reviews and prescribed medications like physicians, operating within a collaborative practice agreement as dependent prescribers. Predefined outcomes included diabetes management (HbA1c and blood glucose), lipid levels (S-LDL), pain (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS]), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9]), and quality of life (assessed via EQ-5D-VAS). The patient's complete medication regimens were reviewed, focusing on dosage appropriateness, indication matching, potential drug-drug interactions, and medication adherence.
A 63-year-old male Slovenian patient diagnosed with depression, type 2 diabetes with polyneuropathy, and hypothyroidism underwent two medication reviews between December 2024 and July 2025. The pharmacist prescribed amitriptyline and semaglutide (accepted by the patient's physician). Notable improvements were observed in glycemic control (HbA1c reduced from 9.9% to 8.2%), and quality of life (EQ-5D-VAS score improved from 30/100 to 80/100). Depression symptoms also resolved, with the PHQ-9 score improving from 11 to 4.
This case study demonstrates that interventions by a clinical pharmacist prescriber during the medication review process resulted in improved clinical outcomes in the treatment of depression, as well as enhanced quality of life. It represents an important contribution to the development of pharmacist prescribing roles in depression management within primary care settings outside of the United Kingdom and the United States.
抑郁症的药物治疗是基层医疗中抑郁症管理的一项重大挑战。尽管已有有效的治疗方法,但许多患者仍未得到充分管理。临床药师是管理中的一种可能策略,不过这种做法在英国和美国以外地区很少见。
该病例的目的是评估临床药师开处方者对抑郁症治疗的影响。
在基层医疗门诊环境中,由一名药师开处方者对一名63岁的斯洛文尼亚患者进行了一项纵向、观察性、基于病例的药物审查。审查包括由临床药师开处方者在规定间隔进行的三次结构化药物审查评估:首次观察、干预后两个月以及首次观察后六个月。药师像医生一样进行药物审查并开处方,作为依赖开处方者在合作医疗协议范围内开展工作。预定义的结果包括糖尿病管理(糖化血红蛋白和血糖)、血脂水平(低密度脂蛋白)、疼痛(视觉模拟评分法[VAS])、抑郁症(患者健康问卷-9[PHQ-9])以及生活质量(通过EQ-5D-VAS评估)。对患者的完整用药方案进行了审查,重点关注剂量合理性、适应症匹配、潜在药物相互作用以及用药依从性。
一名63岁的斯洛文尼亚男性患者被诊断患有抑郁症、2型糖尿病伴多发性神经病变和甲状腺功能减退,在2024年12月至2025年7月期间接受了两次药物审查。药师开了阿米替林和司美格鲁肽(得到了患者医生的认可)。在血糖控制(糖化血红蛋白从9.9%降至8.2%)和生活质量(EQ-5D-VAS评分从30/100提高到80/100)方面观察到显著改善。抑郁症状也得到缓解,PHQ-9评分从11提高到4。
本案例研究表明,临床药师开处方者在药物审查过程中的干预在抑郁症治疗中带来了更好的临床结果以及更高的生活质量。这对在英国和美国以外的基层医疗环境中抑郁症管理中药师开处方角色的发展做出了重要贡献。