• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直肠癌患者远处器官转移模式及危险因素:一项回顾性队列分析

Patterns of Distant Organ Metastasis and Risk Factors in Rectal Adenocarcinoma Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

作者信息

Ur Rehman Mohammad Ebad, Fazal Faizan, Khokhar Arham A, Tahir Saad, Tanveer Usama, Yunus Hamza, Iftikhar Ahmad, Sabir Beenish, Abid Areesha, Faraz Fatima, Malik Bilal Haider

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Holy Family Hospital, Rawalpindi, PAK.

Trauma and Orthopaedics Surgery, Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton-in-Ashfield, GBR.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Aug 14;17(8):e90095. doi: 10.7759/cureus.90095. eCollection 2025 Aug.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.90095
PMID:40951233
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12433290/
Abstract

Background In this study, we aimed to analyze the metastatic patterns of rectal adenocarcinoma (RAC) to specific organs, assessing the incidence, associated risk factors, and prognostic implications of metastasis. Methodology We conducted a retrospective cohort study utilizing data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, focusing on RAC patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2018. Analyses were performed to evaluate overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Results We included 13,564 patients with RAC. Significant risk factors for metastasis were age <50 years (odds ratio (OR) = 1.168), grade 4 (OR = 2.119), T4 (OR = 1.866), N2 (OR = 4.520), and patients without surgery (OR = 9.71). The median OS and CSS in metastatic RAC were 24 and 25 months, respectively. Variables significantly associated with decreased OS were old age, high-grade tumors, T4, N2, tumors >200 mm, no surgery, and multiple metastatic sites. The variables significantly associated with reduced CSS were old age, high-grade tumors, T4, N2, tumors larger than 200 mm, no surgery, and multiple metastatic sites. Conclusions The liver was the most common organ in which metastasis occurred. Significant risk factors observed in RAC patients for metastasis were age <50 years, grade 4, T4, N2, and patients without surgery. Old age, multiple metastatic sites, high-grade tumors, T4, N2, tumors larger than 200 mm, and no surgery were strongly linked to a lower OS rate.

摘要

背景 在本研究中,我们旨在分析直肠腺癌(RAC)转移至特定器官的模式,评估转移的发生率、相关危险因素及预后意义。

方法 我们利用监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库的数据进行了一项回顾性队列研究,重点关注2010年至2018年期间确诊的RAC患者。进行分析以评估总生存期(OS)和癌症特异性生存期(CSS)。

结果 我们纳入了13564例RAC患者。转移的显著危险因素为年龄<50岁(比值比(OR)=1.168)、4级(OR = 2.119)、T4(OR = 1.866)、N2(OR = 4.520)以及未接受手术的患者(OR = 9.71)。转移性RAC的中位OS和CSS分别为24个月和25个月。与OS降低显著相关的变量为老年、高级别肿瘤、T4、N2、肿瘤>200 mm、未手术以及多个转移部位。与CSS降低显著相关的变量为老年、高级别肿瘤、T4、N2、肿瘤大于200 mm、未手术以及多个转移部位。

结论 肝脏是发生转移最常见的器官。在RAC患者中观察到的转移显著危险因素为年龄<50岁、4级、T4、N2以及未接受手术的患者。老年、多个转移部位、高级别肿瘤、T4、N2、肿瘤大于200 mm以及未手术与较低的OS率密切相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05b6/12433290/6273debc6c82/cureus-0017-00000090095-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05b6/12433290/ec9137825af7/cureus-0017-00000090095-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05b6/12433290/6273debc6c82/cureus-0017-00000090095-i02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05b6/12433290/ec9137825af7/cureus-0017-00000090095-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/05b6/12433290/6273debc6c82/cureus-0017-00000090095-i02.jpg

相似文献

1
Patterns of Distant Organ Metastasis and Risk Factors in Rectal Adenocarcinoma Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.直肠癌患者远处器官转移模式及危险因素:一项回顾性队列分析
Cureus. 2025 Aug 14;17(8):e90095. doi: 10.7759/cureus.90095. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
3
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
4
Analysis of clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors: a retrospective cohort study based on the SEER database.阑尾神经内分泌肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后分析:一项基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的回顾性队列研究
Transl Cancer Res. 2025 Aug 31;14(8):4804-4821. doi: 10.21037/tcr-2025-239. Epub 2025 Aug 26.
5
Treatment options for progression or recurrence of glioblastoma: a network meta-analysis.治疗胶质母细胞瘤进展或复发的选择:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 4;5(1):CD013579. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013579.pub2.
6
Bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma: an updated network meta-analysis.双膦酸盐类药物在多发性骨髓瘤中的应用:一项更新的网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 18;12(12):CD003188. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003188.pub4.
7
A systematic review of evidence on malignant spinal metastases: natural history and technologies for identifying patients at high risk of vertebral fracture and spinal cord compression.一项关于恶性脊柱转移瘤的证据的系统回顾:自然病史和识别高风险椎体骨折和脊髓压迫患者的技术。
Health Technol Assess. 2013 Sep;17(42):1-274. doi: 10.3310/hta17420.
8
Bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma: a network meta-analysis.双膦酸盐类药物治疗多发性骨髓瘤:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16(5):CD003188. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003188.pub3.
9
Construction and validation of a novel prognostic nomogram for predicting overall survival in lung adenocarcinoma patients with different patterns of metastasis.构建并验证一种新型列线图预测不同转移模式肺腺癌患者总生存的预后模型。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Nov;149(16):15039-15053. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05288-8. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
10
Impact of first-line chemoimmunotherapy with or without radiotherapy on the prognosis of patients with locally advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter, real-world, retrospective cohort study from China (NCT06478355).一线化疗免疫治疗联合或不联合放疗对局部晚期或转移性食管鳞状细胞癌患者预后的影响:一项来自中国的多中心、真实世界、回顾性队列研究(NCT06478355)
Front Immunol. 2025 Jul 28;16:1633930. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1633930. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Sex differences in disease presentation, surgical and oncological outcome of liver resection for primary and metastatic liver tumors-A retrospective multicenter study.肝切除治疗原发性和转移性肝脏肿瘤的疾病表现、手术和肿瘤学结果的性别差异:一项回顾性多中心研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 14;15(12):e0243539. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243539. eCollection 2020.
2
Clinicopathological features and oncological outcomes of patients with young-onset rectal cancer.青年期直肠癌患者的临床病理特征和肿瘤学结局。
Br J Surg. 2020 Apr;107(5):606-612. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11526. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
3
Hepatic metastasis from colorectal cancer.
结直肠癌肝转移
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2019 Dec;10(6):1274-1298. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2019.08.06.
4
How the ageing microenvironment influences tumour progression.衰老微环境如何影响肿瘤进展。
Nat Rev Cancer. 2020 Feb;20(2):89-106. doi: 10.1038/s41568-019-0222-9. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
5
Mechanisms of Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer and Metastatic Organotropism: Hematogenous versus Peritoneal Spread.结直肠癌转移机制及转移器官嗜性:血行转移与腹膜播散
J Oncol. 2019 Sep 19;2019:7407190. doi: 10.1155/2019/7407190. eCollection 2019.
6
Defining the Hallmarks of Metastasis.定义转移的特征。
Cancer Res. 2019 Jun 15;79(12):3011-3027. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-0458. Epub 2019 May 3.
7
Are Colon and Rectal Cancer Two Different Tumor Entities? A Proposal to Abandon the Term Colorectal Cancer.结肠癌和直肠癌是两种不同的肿瘤实体吗?建议放弃“结直肠癌”一词。
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Aug 30;19(9):2577. doi: 10.3390/ijms19092577.
8
An Update on Colorectal Cancer.结直肠癌最新进展
Curr Probl Surg. 2018 Mar;55(3):76-116. doi: 10.1067/j.cpsurg.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
9
Colorectal cancer patients: what do they die of?结直肠癌患者:他们死于何种原因?
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2012 Jul;3(3):143-149. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2012-100141. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
10
Patterns of metastasis in colon and rectal cancer.结直肠癌转移的模式。
Sci Rep. 2016 Jul 15;6:29765. doi: 10.1038/srep29765.