Suppr超能文献

九种不同运动干预对糖尿病患者胰岛素敏感性的影响:一项系统评价和网状荟萃分析

Effect of nine different exercise interventions on insulin sensitivity in diabetic patients: a systematic review and mesh meta-analysis.

作者信息

Pan Yikang, Wang Peng, Yue Chunlin, Liu Chen

机构信息

Sports Department, Changzhou Vocational Institute of Textile and Garment, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.

Department of Physical Education, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 28;16:1409474. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1409474. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the impact of nine exercise interventions (resistance training [BT, ball training [BT], resistance + walking [RT+W alk], resistance + running [RT + Running], resistance + cycling [RT + bicycle], running, and Tai Chi) on insulin sensitivity in patients with diabetes.

METHODS

A systematic search of five databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science, and CNKI) for RCTs investigating the effects of exercise interventions on insulin sensitivity in patients with diabetes was conducted. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Manual version 5.1.0 Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (ROB). Data analysis software was used for the synthesis and analysis.

RESULTS

This Meta-analysis comprised 21 randomized controlled trials involving 1140 participants. Cycling significantly reduced the fasting glucose index in individuals with diabetes (SUCRA score=90.7%). Resistance exercise exhibited superior efficacy in enhancing insulin sensitivity compared with alternative interventions in patients with diabetes (SUCRA score=71.8%). Furthermore, the combination of resistance exercise and running resulted in a noteworthy decrease in HOMA-IR levels (SUCRA score=64.2%).

CONCLUSION

Cycling, resistance training, and combined aerobic and resistance exercises have been shown to effectively enhance fasting blood glucose levels, insulin secretion, and insulin sensitivity in individuals with diabetes. However, additional studies with longer follow-up periods and more rigorous methodologies are required to further validate these findings.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://ww.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42023450107.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估九种运动干预措施(抗阻训练[BT]、球训练[BT]、抗阻+步行[RT+Walk]、抗阻+跑步[RT+Running]、抗阻+骑行[RT+bicycle]、跑步和太极拳)对糖尿病患者胰岛素敏感性的影响。

方法

对五个数据库(PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane、科学引文索引和中国知网)进行系统检索,以查找调查运动干预对糖尿病患者胰岛素敏感性影响的随机对照试验。使用Cochrane手册5.1.0版偏倚风险评估工具(ROB)评估纳入研究的质量。使用数据分析软件进行综合和分析。

结果

该荟萃分析包括21项随机对照试验,涉及1140名参与者。骑行显著降低了糖尿病患者的空腹血糖指数(累积排序曲线下面积分数=90.7%)。与其他干预措施相比,抗阻运动在增强糖尿病患者胰岛素敏感性方面表现出更高的疗效(累积排序曲线下面积分数=71.8%)。此外,抗阻运动与跑步相结合可使稳态模型评估的胰岛素抵抗(HOMA-IR)水平显著降低(累积排序曲线下面积分数=64.2%)。

结论

骑行、抗阻训练以及有氧与抗阻运动相结合已被证明可有效提高糖尿病患者的空腹血糖水平、胰岛素分泌和胰岛素敏感性。然而,需要更多随访期更长且方法更严谨的研究来进一步验证这些发现。

系统评价注册

https://ww.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/,标识符CRD42023450107。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4c6/12424434/46160e392e72/fendo-16-1409474-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验