• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于修复乳磨牙的预成冠上的黏附：一项体外研究。

Adhesion of on preformed crowns used to restore primary molars: An in vitro study.

作者信息

Bakhurji Eman A, AlEraky Doaa M, Alshammary Hend, Alamoudi Marwah, Alrayes Nabras, Hassan Mohamed

机构信息

Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.

Microbiology and Immunology, Biomedical Science Department, College of Medicine, Gulf Medical University (GMU), United Arab Emirates.

出版信息

Saudi Dent J. 2024 Dec;36(12):1539-1543. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.10.001. Epub 2024 Oct 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.10.001
PMID:40952874
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11976092/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Assessing microbial biofilm adhesion to the restorative material's surface is a key factor in determining its success. This study aimed to compare the adhesion of () on stainless steel crowns (SSCs) versus zirconia crowns (ZCs) used for primary molars.

STUDY DESIGN

This in vitro study involved 20 full-coverage crowns, with 10 SSCs and 10 ZCs. A fungal adhesion assay was performed to evaluate adhesion, using colony-forming units (CFU) and cell proliferation assays.

STATISTICS

The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was applied to compare the groups, with statistical significance set at 5 %.

RESULTS

The study revealed that SSCs had a lower mean CFU value (28.28 ± 4.557 CFU/ml) and cell proliferation rate (49.74 ± 0.4367) compared to the ZC group (30.70 ± 11.0760 CFU/ml and 74.53 ± 0.7014, respectively). However, these differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that the selection of crowns for restoring primary molars may not be influenced by adhesion.

摘要

背景

评估微生物生物膜对修复材料表面的粘附是决定其成功的关键因素。本研究旨在比较（）在用于乳牙的不锈钢冠（SSC）和氧化锆冠（ZC）上的粘附情况。

研究设计

这项体外研究涉及20个全冠，其中10个SSC和10个ZC。采用菌落形成单位（CFU）和细胞增殖试验进行真菌粘附试验，以评估（）的粘附情况。

统计学方法

采用Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney检验比较各组，设定统计学显著性水平为5%。

结果

研究表明，与ZC组（分别为30.70±11.0760 CFU/ml和74.53±0.7014）相比，SSC组的平均CFU值（28.28±4.557 CFU/ml）和细胞增殖率（49.74±0.4367）较低。然而，这些差异无统计学意义。

结论

研究结果表明，用于修复乳牙的牙冠选择可能不受（）粘附的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0f1/11976092/430ae5c61ad9/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0f1/11976092/a0907eadfbef/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0f1/11976092/430ae5c61ad9/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0f1/11976092/a0907eadfbef/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0f1/11976092/430ae5c61ad9/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Adhesion of on preformed crowns used to restore primary molars: An in vitro study.用于修复乳磨牙的预成冠上的黏附：一项体外研究。
Saudi Dent J. 2024 Dec;36(12):1539-1543. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.10.001. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
2
Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth.乳牙龋齿的预成冠
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 31;2015(12):CD005512. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005512.pub3.
3
Comparative Study on the Durability of Stainless Steel Crowns vs. Zirconia Crowns for Pediatric Use.儿童用不锈钢冠与氧化锆冠耐久性的比较研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025 Jun;17(Suppl 2):S1631-S1633. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_199_25. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
4
Clinical and radiographic outcomes of endocrowns fabricated from two different CAD-CAM materials versus stainless steel crowns in restoring first permanent molars in children: a randomized clinical trial.两种不同CAD-CAM材料制作的嵌体冠与不锈钢冠修复儿童第一恒磨牙的临床和影像学结果：一项随机临床试验
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 8;25(1):1127. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06507-z.
5
Effectiveness of zirconia crowns compared with stainless steel crowns in primary posterior teeth rehabilitation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.氧化锆全瓷冠与不锈钢预成冠在后牙修复中的临床效果比较：系统评价和Meta 分析。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2022 Feb;153(2):158-166.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2021.08.005.
6
WITHDRAWN: Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.撤回：用于治疗乳牙龋齿的牙科填充物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 17;10(10):CD004483. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004483.pub3.
7
Dental fillings for the treatment of caries in the primary dentition.用于治疗乳牙龋齿的补牙材料。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15(2):CD004483. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004483.pub2.
8
Retention of Bioflx, Zirconia, and Stainless Steel crowns using two different luting cements in primary molars: an in vitro study.在乳磨牙中使用两种不同粘结水门汀对Bioflx、氧化锆和不锈钢全冠的固位：一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Aug 15;25(1):1328. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06671-2.
9
Microbiological Analysis of Primary Molars Restored with Stainless Steel Crowns Compared to Healthy Molars.与健康磨牙相比，用不锈钢冠修复的乳磨牙的微生物学分析
Microorganisms. 2025 May 31;13(6):1294. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13061294.
10
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方：益处与风险

本文引用的文献

1
Battle royale: Immune response on biofilms - host-pathogen interactions.激烈竞争：生物膜上的免疫反应——宿主与病原体的相互作用
Curr Res Immunol. 2023 Mar 28;4:100057. doi: 10.1016/j.crimmu.2023.100057. eCollection 2023.
2
Antibiofilm Activity of 3D-Printed Nanocomposite Resin: Impact of ZrO Nanoparticles.3D打印纳米复合树脂的抗生物膜活性：ZrO纳米颗粒的影响
Nanomaterials (Basel). 2023 Feb 1;13(3):591. doi: 10.3390/nano13030591.
3
Evaluation of the biofilm life cycle between and .和 之间生物膜生命周期的评估。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Aug 18;12:953168. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.953168. eCollection 2022.
4
Lactobacilli displacement and Candida albicans inhibition on initial adhesion assays: a probiotic analysis.初始黏附试验中乳酸菌的取代和白色念珠菌的抑制：益生菌分析。
BMC Res Notes. 2022 Jul 7;15(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-06114-z.
5
Performance of four bacterial cell counting apps for smartphones.四款智能手机细菌细胞计数应用程序的性能比较。
J Microbiol Methods. 2022 Aug;199:106508. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2022.106508. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
6
Prevalence of biofilms in Candida spp. bloodstream infections: A meta-analysis.念珠菌属血流感染中生物膜的流行情况：一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 3;17(2):e0263522. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263522. eCollection 2022.
7
Evaluation of Clinical Success, Parental and Child Satisfaction of Stainless Steel Crowns and Zirconia Crowns in Primary Molars.不锈钢冠和氧化锆冠用于乳磨牙的临床成功率、家长及儿童满意度评估
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Mar 26;9(3):1418-1423. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1006_19. eCollection 2020 Mar.
8
In vitro adherence of Candida albicans to zirconia surfaces.白念珠菌在氧化锆表面的体外黏附。
Oral Dis. 2020 Jul;26(5):1072-1080. doi: 10.1111/odi.13319. Epub 2020 Mar 21.
9
Evaluation of adhesion of Streptococcus mutans, plaque accumulation on zirconia and stainless steel crowns, and surrounding gingival inflammation in primary molars: randomized controlled trial.评价变形链球菌黏附、菌斑在氧化锆和不锈钢冠上的堆积以及乳磨牙周围牙龈炎症：随机对照试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Sep;24(9):3275-3280. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03204-9. Epub 2020 Jan 18.
10
Dual-species biofilms of and exhibit more biomass and are mutually beneficial compared with single-species biofilms.与单物种生物膜相比，[具体两种物种名称未给出]的双物种生物膜表现出更多的生物量且具有互利关系。
J Oral Microbiol. 2019 Mar 20;11(1):1581520. doi: 10.1080/20002297.2019.1581520. eCollection 2019.