• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估印度尼西亚公共卫生中心的互联网质量:横断面评估研究。

Assessing Internet Quality Across Public Health Centers in Indonesia: Cross-Sectional Evaluation Study.

作者信息

Aisyah Dewi Nur, Setiawan Agus Heri, Lokopessy Alfiano Fawwaz, Mayadewi Chyntia Aryanti, Endryantoro M Thoriqul Aziz, Wibowo Viktor, Disviana Sarah, Laksana Indra, Aviandito Mohammad, Kozlakidis Zisis, Manikam Logan

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, United Kingdom, 44 02076792000.

Digital Transformation Office, Ministry of Health Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.

出版信息

JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Sep 15;13:e65940. doi: 10.2196/65940.

DOI:10.2196/65940
PMID:40953366
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12435787/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary health care centers (Puskesmas) serve as the cornerstone of Indonesia's health care system, providing integrated services aimed at improving individual health through prevention, treatment, and health promotion. To fulfill these roles effectively, robust technological infrastructure, particularly reliable internet connectivity, is increasingly essential. Assessing the availability and quality of internet access in Puskesmas is therefore a critical step in understanding their readiness to implement digital health initiatives and fulfill their responsibilities in delivering accessible and effective healthcare services.

OBJECTIVE

This study provides a national baseline assessment of internet quality and its relevant IT infrastructure in more than 10,000 Puskesmas across Indonesia.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was conducted throughout all Puskesmas (10,382) in 34 provinces in Indonesia, using an online questionnaire. Categorization was done to analyze internet quality level results.

RESULTS

A total of 10,378 out of 10,382 public health centers (99.96%) participated in this study. Overall, 745 of 10,382 (7.18%) did not have internet access, 1487 (14.33%) had limited internet access, 5567 (53.64%) had sufficient internet access, and 2579 (24.85%) had sufficient and fast internet access. Moreover, 832 of 10,382 Puskesmas (8.02%) did not have 24-hour electricity, 44,196 (43.7%) had a central processing unit (CPU) with i3 specifications, 43,044 (42.56%) had 512 GB hard disk capacity, and 67,272 (66.5%) used antivirus.

CONCLUSIONS

Although 79% (8201/10,382) of Puskesmas in Indonesia already had sufficient internet access, 21% (2180/10,382) still have limited and insufficient access. To ensure universal internet availability, it is essential to build collaborative support among internet providers and government to foster the availability and use of internet satellites, high-quality computers, and electrical power to support internet connectivity.

摘要

背景

初级卫生保健中心(Puskesmas)是印度尼西亚卫生保健系统的基石,提供旨在通过预防、治疗和健康促进来改善个人健康的综合服务。为了有效履行这些职责,强大的技术基础设施,尤其是可靠的互联网连接,变得越来越重要。因此,评估Puskesmas的互联网接入可用性和质量是了解其实施数字健康计划的准备情况以及履行其提供可及且有效医疗服务责任的关键一步。

目的

本研究对印度尼西亚10000多个Puskesmas的互联网质量及其相关IT基础设施进行了全国性基线评估。

方法

通过在线问卷对印度尼西亚34个省份的所有Puskesmas(10382个)进行了横断面调查。进行分类以分析互联网质量水平结果。

结果

10382个公共卫生中心中的10378个(99.96%)参与了本研究。总体而言,10382个中有745个(7.18%)没有互联网接入,1487个(14.33%)互联网接入有限,5567个(53.64%)有足够的互联网接入,2579个(24.85%)有足够且快速的互联网接入。此外,10382个Puskesmas中有832个(8.02%)没有24小时供电,44196个(43.7%)有i3规格的中央处理器(CPU),43044个(42.56%)有512GB硬盘容量,67272个(66.5%)使用了杀毒软件。

结论

尽管印度尼西亚79%(8201/10382)的Puskesmas已经有足够的互联网接入,但21%(2180/10382)的接入仍然有限且不足。为确保普遍的互联网可用性,互联网服务提供商和政府之间建立协作支持以促进互联网卫星、高质量计算机和电力的可用性和使用以支持互联网连接至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b7e/12435787/bbf01dd0297b/medinform-v13-e65940-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b7e/12435787/c08b0c241410/medinform-v13-e65940-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b7e/12435787/9e88c32664c0/medinform-v13-e65940-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b7e/12435787/85a71c40d8f9/medinform-v13-e65940-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b7e/12435787/558927433ec7/medinform-v13-e65940-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b7e/12435787/529a9de4bcac/medinform-v13-e65940-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b7e/12435787/45f65a1ac6c5/medinform-v13-e65940-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b7e/12435787/bd1af17f0650/medinform-v13-e65940-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b7e/12435787/bbf01dd0297b/medinform-v13-e65940-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b7e/12435787/c08b0c241410/medinform-v13-e65940-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b7e/12435787/9e88c32664c0/medinform-v13-e65940-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b7e/12435787/85a71c40d8f9/medinform-v13-e65940-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b7e/12435787/558927433ec7/medinform-v13-e65940-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b7e/12435787/529a9de4bcac/medinform-v13-e65940-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b7e/12435787/45f65a1ac6c5/medinform-v13-e65940-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b7e/12435787/bd1af17f0650/medinform-v13-e65940-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8b7e/12435787/bbf01dd0297b/medinform-v13-e65940-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing Internet Quality Across Public Health Centers in Indonesia: Cross-Sectional Evaluation Study.评估印度尼西亚公共卫生中心的互联网质量:横断面评估研究。
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Sep 15;13:e65940. doi: 10.2196/65940.
2
Understanding Health Information Systems Utilization Across Public Health Centers in Indonesia: Cross-Sectional Study.了解印度尼西亚公共卫生中心的健康信息系统使用情况:横断面研究。
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Sep 3;13:e68613. doi: 10.2196/68613.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Internet Access and Use Among Dementia Carers and the People They Support in Australia: Cross-Sectional Survey.澳大利亚痴呆症护理人员及其所照料人群的互联网接入与使用情况:横断面调查
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Aug 22;9:e68333. doi: 10.2196/68333.
5
Using an Electronic Immunization Registry (Aplikasi Sehat IndonesiaKu) in Indonesia: Cross-Sectional Study.在印度尼西亚使用电子免疫登记系统(印尼健康应用程序):横断面研究。
Interact J Med Res. 2025 Mar 27;14:e53849. doi: 10.2196/53849.
6
Satisfaction With Internet Access, Cancer Information-Seeking, and Digital Health Technology: Cross-Sectional Survey Assessment.对互联网接入、癌症信息寻求和数字健康技术的满意度:横断面调查评估
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 27;27:e69606. doi: 10.2196/69606.
7
Post-pandemic planning for maternity care for local, regional, and national maternity systems across the four nations: a mixed-methods study.针对四个地区的地方、区域和国家孕产妇保健系统的疫情后规划:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Sep;13(35):1-25. doi: 10.3310/HHTE6611.
8
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
9
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
10
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.

本文引用的文献

1
Using an Electronic Immunization Registry (Aplikasi Sehat IndonesiaKu) in Indonesia: Cross-Sectional Study.在印度尼西亚使用电子免疫登记系统(印尼健康应用程序):横断面研究。
Interact J Med Res. 2025 Mar 27;14:e53849. doi: 10.2196/53849.
2
Enterprise-led internet healthcare provision in China: insights from a leading platform.中国企业主导的互联网医疗服务:来自领先平台的见解。
Front Digit Health. 2025 Mar 3;7:1491183. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1491183. eCollection 2025.
3
Cybersecurity Interventions in Health Care Organizations in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Scoping Review.
中低收入国家医疗机构的网络安全干预措施:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Nov 20;26:e47311. doi: 10.2196/47311.
4
Digital Health Interventions to Improve Access to and Quality of Primary Health Care Services: A Scoping Review.改善初级卫生保健服务可及性和质量的数字健康干预措施:一项范围综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Sep 28;20(19):6854. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20196854.
5
Barriers and facilitators for the sustainability of digital health interventions in low and middle-income countries: A systematic review.低收入和中等收入国家数字健康干预措施可持续性的障碍与促进因素:一项系统综述。
Front Digit Health. 2022 Nov 28;4:1014375. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.1014375. eCollection 2022.
6
The demographic and economic features: the nexus with internet use.人口统计学和经济特征:与互联网使用的关系。
Heliyon. 2022 Sep 19;8(9):e10686. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10686. eCollection 2022 Sep.
7
Building power-ful health systems: the impacts of electrification on health outcomes in LMICs.建设强大的卫生系统:电气化对中低收入国家卫生结果的影响。
Psychol Health Med. 2022 Jan-Dec;27(sup1):124-137. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2022.2109049. Epub 2022 Aug 5.
8
Impacts of the Internet on Health Inequality and Healthcare Access: A Cross-Country Study.互联网对健康不平等和医疗保健可及性的影响:一项跨国研究。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 9;10:935608. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.935608. eCollection 2022.
9
Internet access and its role on educational inequality during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间的互联网接入及其在教育不平等方面所起的作用。
Telecomm Policy. 2022 Jun;46(5):102353. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102353. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
10
Digitization in gynecology and obstetrics in times of COVID-19: Results of a national survey.COVID-19 时期妇产科的数字化:一项全国性调查结果
Internet Interv. 2021 Dec;26:100478. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2021.100478. Epub 2021 Nov 11.