• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腰椎竖脊肌平面阻滞与不进行局部区域阻滞在髋关节手术中的有效性和安全性:一项随机对照试验方案

Effectiveness and Safety of Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus No Locoregional Block in Hip Surgery: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

García-Reza Laura, Raposeiras Sergio, P Loureiro Javier, Pita-Romero Rafael, Amate Pena Juan Jose, Pereira Loureiro Miguel Angel

机构信息

Division of Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care, University Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro, Vigo, Spain.

TALIONIS Research group, Information and Communications Technology Research Center, A Coruña University, A Coruña, Spain.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Sep 15;14:e75854. doi: 10.2196/75854.

DOI:10.2196/75854
PMID:40953436
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12481142/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia in hip surgery has been shown to reduce the need for opioids and conventional analgesics, facilitate ambulation and early recovery, improve respiratory dynamics, and decrease the incidence of venous thrombosis and pneumonia. Lumbar erector spinae plane block (L-ESPB) has been proposed as a novel ultrasound-guided locoregional technique to relieve pain in hip surgery; however, the supporting evidence remains scarce.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to provide evidence on the role of L-ESPB in perioperative pain management during hip surgery. We hypothesize that patients receiving L-ESPB compared to those without block will have lower opioid consumption and less pain after hip surgery. The primary outcome is the difference in pain intensity, measured using the visual analog scale, at 2 hours postoperatively between the L-ESPB group and the control group. We will compare postoperative analgesic needs and opioid consumption in both groups, assess the technical ease of performing L-ESPB, and record any side effects in both treatment arms. Finally, we will evaluate the level of patient satisfaction.

METHODS

This is a pragmatic, single-center, parallel-group randomized controlled trial. After patients provide informed consent, they will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either ultrasound-guided L-ESPB or conventional intravenous analgesia. A total of 180 patients (n=90, 50% in each group) will be enrolled. Data analysis will be performed using SPSS software.

RESULTS

This clinical trial was approved by the European Medicines Agency on May 27, 2024, following approval by the local ethics committee earlier that month. Patient recruitment took place between June 2024 and May 2025. Statistical analysis is currently ongoing, and final results are expected to be submitted for publication in early 2026.

CONCLUSIONS

This clinical trial will enable us to assess the analgesic effectiveness of L-ESPB in hip surgery. We will also evaluate its safety and potential adverse effects compared with conventional analgesia and opioid consumption.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06567522; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06567522.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/75854.

摘要

背景

超声引导下的区域麻醉应用于髋关节手术已被证明可减少对阿片类药物和传统镇痛药的需求,促进患者行走和早期康复,改善呼吸动力学,并降低静脉血栓形成和肺炎的发生率。腰椎竖脊肌平面阻滞(L-ESPB)已被提出作为一种新型的超声引导下局部区域技术用于缓解髋关节手术中的疼痛;然而,支持证据仍然匮乏。

目的

本研究旨在为L-ESPB在髋关节手术围手术期疼痛管理中的作用提供证据。我们假设与未接受阻滞的患者相比,接受L-ESPB的患者在髋关节手术后阿片类药物的消耗量更低且疼痛更轻。主要结局是L-ESPB组和对照组术后2小时使用视觉模拟量表测量的疼痛强度差异。我们将比较两组术后的镇痛需求和阿片类药物消耗量,评估实施L-ESPB的技术难易程度,并记录两个治疗组的任何副作用。最后,我们将评估患者满意度水平。

方法

这是一项务实的单中心平行组随机对照试验。患者提供知情同意后,将按1:1的比例随机分配接受超声引导下的L-ESPB或传统静脉镇痛。总共将招募180名患者(每组n = 90,各占50%)。将使用SPSS软件进行数据分析。

结果

该临床试验于2024年5月27日获得欧洲药品管理局批准,当月早些时候已获得当地伦理委员会批准。患者招募于2024年6月至2025年5月期间进行。目前正在进行统计分析,最终结果预计将于2026年初提交发表。

结论

这项临床试验将使我们能够评估L-ESPB在髋关节手术中的镇痛效果。我们还将评估其与传统镇痛和阿片类药物消耗相比的安全性和潜在不良反应。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06567522;https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06567522。

国际注册报告标识符(IRRID):DERR1-10.2196/75854。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c6d/12481142/3513d71ec942/resprot_v14i1e75854_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c6d/12481142/b2a082eeb8c3/resprot_v14i1e75854_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c6d/12481142/3513d71ec942/resprot_v14i1e75854_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c6d/12481142/b2a082eeb8c3/resprot_v14i1e75854_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c6d/12481142/3513d71ec942/resprot_v14i1e75854_fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness and Safety of Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus No Locoregional Block in Hip Surgery: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.腰椎竖脊肌平面阻滞与不进行局部区域阻滞在髋关节手术中的有效性和安全性:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Sep 15;14:e75854. doi: 10.2196/75854.
2
Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain.竖脊肌平面阻滞用于术后疼痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 12;2(2):CD013763. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013763.pub3.
3
Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain.竖脊肌平面阻滞用于术后疼痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 9;10(10):CD013763. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013763.pub2.
4
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
5
Regional analgesia techniques for postoperative pain after breast cancer surgery: a network meta-analysis.乳腺癌手术后疼痛的区域镇痛技术:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 4;6(6):CD014818. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014818.pub2.
6
Comparison of ultrasound-guided continuous intertransverse process block and continuous erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia after uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: protocol for a double-blind, prospective, randomised controlled trial.超声引导下连续横突间阻滞与连续竖脊肌平面阻滞用于单孔电视辅助胸腔镜手术后镇痛的比较:一项双盲、前瞻性、随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Sep 28;15(9):e099082. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099082.
7
Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block Versus Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) in Pediatric Hip Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Controlled Trial.小儿髋关节手术中囊周神经组(PENG)阻滞与腰竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)的比较:一项随机、双盲、对照试验
J Pediatr Orthop. 2025 Apr 1;45(4):e324-e330. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002882. Epub 2024 Dec 18.
8
Vesicoureteral Reflux膀胱输尿管反流
9
Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block in Elderly Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Triple-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞在老年全髋关节置换术患者中的应用:一项三盲随机对照试验
J Arthroplasty. 2025 Apr;40(4):999-1004. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.10.052. Epub 2024 Oct 19.
10
Analgesic efficacy of continuous erector spinae plane block vs. opioid-based regimen for postoperative pain management following video-assisted thoracoscopic lung resection: a prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.持续竖脊肌平面阻滞与阿片类药物方案用于电视辅助胸腔镜肺切除术后疼痛管理的镇痛效果:一项前瞻性、随机、开放标签、非劣效性试验。
Anaesthesia. 2025 Jun 23. doi: 10.1111/anae.16651.

本文引用的文献

1
Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Hip Fractures.髋部骨折的周围神经阻滞
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 13;13(12):3457. doi: 10.3390/jcm13123457.
2
Single-Shot Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block in Total Hip Replacement: A Randomized Clinical Trial.单次腰方肌平面阻滞在全髋关节置换术中的应用:一项随机临床试验。
Anesth Analg. 2022 Oct 1;135(4):829-836. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006162. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
3
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Single-Shot Quadratus Lumborum Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Adults Following Total Hip Arthroplasty.
超声引导下单次竖脊肌平面阻滞用于全髋关节置换术后成人镇痛的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pain Med. 2022 May 30;23(6):1047-1058. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab353.
4
Comparison of pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block with fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) for pain control in hip fractures: A double-blind prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.经皮髋关节囊周围神经群(PENG)阻滞与股神经周围筋膜腔阻滞(FICB)用于髋部骨折疼痛控制的比较:一项双盲前瞻性随机对照临床试验。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022 Feb;108(1):103135. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103135. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
5
Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block provides improved short-term analgesia compared with the femoral nerve block in hip fracture surgery: a single-center double-blinded randomized comparative trial.关节囊周围神经群(PENG)阻滞与股神经阻滞相比,可为髋关节骨折手术提供更好的短期镇痛效果:一项单中心、双盲、随机对照试验。
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 May;46(5):398-403. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-102315. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
6
Fascia iliaca compartment block.髂筋膜间隙阻滞
BJA Educ. 2019 Jun;19(6):191-197. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
7
Anatomical basis of erector spinae plane block: a dissection and histotopographic pilot study.竖脊肌平面阻滞的解剖学基础:一项解剖和组织学初步研究。
J Anesth. 2021 Feb;35(1):102-111. doi: 10.1007/s00540-020-02881-w. Epub 2020 Dec 19.
8
Anesthetic Techniques: Focus on Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block.麻醉技术:聚焦于腰竖脊肌平面阻滞
Local Reg Anesth. 2020 Sep 25;13:121-133. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S233274. eCollection 2020.
9
Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block as a Main Anesthetic Method for Hip Surgery in High Risk Elderly Patients: Initial Experience with a Magnetic Resonance Imaging.腰椎竖脊肌平面阻滞作为高危老年患者髋关节手术的主要麻醉方法:磁共振成像的初步经验
Eurasian J Med. 2020 Feb;52(1):16-20. doi: 10.5152/eurasianjmed.2020.19224.
10
The effects of early femoral nerve block intervention on preoperative pain management and incidence of postoperative delirium geriatric patients undergoing trochanteric femur fracture surgery: A randomized controlled trial.早期股神经阻滞干预对老年股骨转子间骨折手术患者术前疼痛管理及术后谵妄发生率的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2020 Jan;26(1):109-114. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2019.78002.