Arora Monika, Chopra Mansi, Shrivastav Radhika, Srinivasapura Venkateshmurthy Nikhil, Oli Natalia, Rao Niharika, Gupta Mansi, Cassambai Shabana, Highton Patrick, Vaidya Abhinav, Singh Kuldeep, Crompton Amanda, Mohan Sailesh, Khunti Kamlesh, Prabhakaran Dorairaj
HRIDAY, New Delhi, Delhi, India
Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, India.
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Sep 15;10(9):e018968. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2025-018968.
Living with multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs) presents significant healthcare and patient-level challenges, which are further compounded by fragmented and poorly coordinated healthcare systems, leading to difficulties in access, dissatisfaction with quality of services, non-engagement with treatment protocols and poor outcomes. Overcoming these barriers requires a strong and equitable primary healthcare system that prioritises people-centred care and fosters meaningful community engagement. We aimed to understand how individuals with MLTCs navigate healthcare systems and co-create strategies to support community engagement.10 community conversations (n=90 respondents) were held in New Delhi, Jodhpur, Visakhapatnam (India), Duwakot and Bhaktapur (Nepal) between October-November 2021. These structured discussions explored experiences, beliefs, needs and perceptions of people living with MLTCs, caregivers and healthcare providers. Participants included adults aged 30-75 years, with an equal distribution of men and women. Respondents living with MLTCs reported conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, chronic respiratory diseases and mental health conditions. Using a six-step inductive thematic analysis, we examined access, availability, affordability of healthcare services, continuity of care, expectations of health system interventions-electronic decision support system, assisted telemedicine, patient-facing services and community engagement and involvement (CEI).Six key themes emerged: (1) definition of community; (2) disease labelling, identity, social stigma, discrimination and coping mechanisms among people living with MLTCs; (3) access, availability and affordability of medications and healthcare services and associated challenges in receiving care; (4) role of local leaders, decision makers and healthcare professionals; (5) uptake, acceptability and building capacity on use of digital interventions such as telemedicine for healthcare service delivery; (6) community engagement methods, including the need for creation of community champions and innovative approaches to improve healthcare service delivery.The findings highlight significant barriers to accessing care yet also demonstrate the community's readiness to embrace digital tools, especially when guided and supported by trusted local leaders. These insights have key implications for health policy and programme design. Meaningfully engaging people with lived experiences as community champions can improve trust, screening, early diagnosis and self-management, while also bridging gaps between communities and health systems. Digital health interventions such as telemedicine should be embedded within primary care systems through culturally resonant and locally tailored approaches that build digital literacy and foster acceptance. Co-created CEI strategies can help design more equitable, people-centred and scalable health interventions.
患有多种长期疾病(MLTCs)给医疗保健和患者层面带来了重大挑战,而碎片化且协调不佳的医疗系统使这些挑战进一步加剧,导致就医困难、对服务质量不满、不遵守治疗方案以及治疗效果不佳。克服这些障碍需要一个强大且公平的初级医疗保健系统,该系统应优先提供以人为本的护理,并促进有意义的社区参与。我们旨在了解患有MLTCs的个体如何在医疗系统中就医,并共同制定支持社区参与的策略。2021年10月至11月期间,在新德里、焦特布尔、维沙卡帕特南(印度)、杜瓦科特和巴克塔普尔(尼泊尔)举行了10次社区对话(90名受访者)。这些结构化讨论探讨了患有MLTCs的人群、护理人员和医疗服务提供者的经历、信念、需求和看法。参与者包括年龄在30至75岁之间的成年人,男女比例均等。患有MLTCs的受访者报告了糖尿病、高血压、心血管疾病、慢性呼吸道疾病和心理健康状况等疾病。我们采用六步归纳主题分析法,研究了医疗服务的可及性、可用性、可负担性、护理连续性、对卫生系统干预措施(电子决策支持系统、辅助远程医疗、面向患者的服务以及社区参与和介入(CEI))的期望。出现了六个关键主题:(1)社区的定义;(2)患有MLTCs的人群中的疾病标签、身份认同、社会耻辱感、歧视及应对机制;(3)药物和医疗服务的可及性、可用性和可负担性以及接受护理时的相关挑战;(4)地方领导人、决策者和医疗专业人员的作用;(5)对远程医疗等数字干预措施在医疗服务提供方面的采用、可接受性及能力建设;(6)社区参与方法,包括创建社区倡导者的必要性以及改善医疗服务提供的创新方法。研究结果凸显了就医的重大障碍,但也表明社区愿意接受数字工具,尤其是在得到可信赖的地方领导人指导和支持的情况下。这些见解对卫生政策和项目设计具有关键意义。让有实际生活经验的人作为社区倡导者充分参与,可以提高信任度、筛查率、早期诊断率和自我管理能力,同时弥合社区与卫生系统之间的差距。远程医疗等数字健康干预措施应通过具有文化共鸣且因地制宜的方法融入初级保健系统,这些方法可以培养数字素养并促进接受度。共同制定的CEI策略有助于设计更公平、以人为本且可扩展的健康干预措施。