Kitamura Kazushi, Iwasaki Koichi, Mikami Kazuyuki, Hasegawa Hiroshi, Sasaki Isao
Neurosurgery, Ainomiyako Neurosurgery Hospital, Osaka, JPN.
Cureus. 2025 Aug 15;17(8):e90185. doi: 10.7759/cureus.90185. eCollection 2025 Aug.
Elongation of the styloid process (SP) is a recognized etiologic factor in vascular pathologies such as carotid artery dissection (CAD), particularly in Eagle syndrome or stylocarotid artery syndrome. However, CAD involving an SP of normal length is exceedingly rare and often overlooked in clinical evaluations. We present a unique case of bilateral CAD caused by mechanical injury from asymmetric SPs - one elongated and the other of normal length - challenging the conventional belief that only elongated SPs carry clinical importance. A 47-year-old female patient experienced sequential episodes of bilateral CAD over a seven-month period. Radiological evaluations identified bilateral CAD likely attributed to the left SP of normal length (22 mm) and the right SP with elongation (35 mm). Both SPs were located in close proximity (<1 mm) to their respective internal carotid arteries (ICAs). Notably, despite its normal length, the left SP had a steep medial angulation of 65.1°, contributing to the ICA impingement. To restore vascular patency and prevent recurrence, the patient underwent successful bilateral carotid artery stenting followed by transcervical styloidectomies. While elongated SPs are commonly implicated in unilateral vascular symptoms, bilateral CAD related to SP impingement is rare. This case illustrates that even an SP of normal length can cause vascular injury when it exhibits atypical angulation and lies in close proximity to the ICA. Contrary to the conventional belief that only SP elongation has clinical importance, SPs of normal length may play a pathogenic role in SP-related CAD under specific anatomical conditions. We emphasize the importance of a comprehensive radiological evaluation that focuses not solely on SP length when considering potential SP-related vascular pathology.
茎突延长是诸如颈动脉夹层(CAD)等血管病变公认的病因,尤其是在鹰综合征或茎突颈动脉综合征中。然而,涉及正常长度茎突的CAD极为罕见,在临床评估中常被忽视。我们报告了一例独特的双侧CAD病例,病因是不对称茎突造成的机械损伤——一个茎突延长,另一个长度正常——这挑战了传统观念,即只有延长的茎突才具有临床意义。一名47岁女性患者在七个月内先后出现双侧CAD发作。影像学评估确定双侧CAD可能归因于长度正常(22毫米)的左侧茎突和延长(35毫米)的右侧茎突。两个茎突均与其各自的颈内动脉(ICA)紧邻(<1毫米)。值得注意的是,尽管左侧茎突长度正常,但其向内侧有65.1°的陡峭角度,导致ICA受压。为恢复血管通畅并防止复发,患者成功接受了双侧颈动脉支架置入术,随后进行了经颈茎突切除术。虽然延长的茎突通常与单侧血管症状有关,但与茎突压迫相关的双侧CAD很少见。该病例表明,即使是正常长度的茎突,当其呈现非典型角度且紧邻ICA时,也可导致血管损伤。与只有茎突延长具有临床重要性的传统观念相反,在特定解剖条件下,正常长度的茎突可能在与茎突相关的CAD中起致病作用。我们强调,在考虑潜在的与茎突相关的血管病变时,全面的影像学评估非常重要,不能仅关注茎突长度。