Singh Umesh Pratap, Mishra Dheerendra Kumar, Sardesai Ujwal
Medicine, Shyam Shah Medical College, Rewa, IND.
Psychiatry, Government Medical College Satna, Satna, IND.
Cureus. 2025 Aug 15;17(8):e90133. doi: 10.7759/cureus.90133. eCollection 2025 Aug.
Background Late-onset depression is pathophysiologically distinct from early-onset depression, often requiring higher doses and a longer duration of antidepressant therapy to achieve a therapeutic response. Immune dysfunction, atherosclerosis, and vascular etiology are critical factors involved in the pathogenesis of late-onset depression. Based on this understanding, we hypothesize that levels of inflammatory markers in individuals with late-onset depression may be associated with their response to antidepressant therapy. Methodology Individuals aged >60 years who presented with their first depressive episode (as defined by the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Diagnostic Criteria for Research) were recruited. A complete clinical assessment, C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and depression severity assessment using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) were performed at baseline. Patients were prescribed antidepressant medication and reassessed for depression severity in HAMD after an eight-week follow-up. Results The study sample (n = 25) had a mean age of 64.7 ± 5.8 years and a baseline HAMD score of 18 ± 3. The overall response rate to antidepressant therapy was 24%. The mean age of individuals who responded to antidepressant therapy (n = 6) was 63.5 ± 4.9 years, and their baseline HAMD score was 16 ± 1.9. The mean age of individuals who were partial responders or non-responders to antidepressant therapy (n = 19) was 65.1 ± 6.1 years, and their baseline HAMD score was 18.5 ± 3.9. Additionally, there was a negative correlation between baseline CRP levels and antidepressant responsiveness (r = -0.6, p < 0.05). Conclusions Late-onset depression was less responsive to antidepressant medication, and a poor antidepressant response rate was associated with a higher level of CRP in late-onset depression.
迟发性抑郁症在病理生理上与早发性抑郁症不同,通常需要更高剂量和更长疗程的抗抑郁治疗才能达到治疗效果。免疫功能障碍、动脉粥样硬化和血管病因是迟发性抑郁症发病机制中的关键因素。基于这一认识,我们假设迟发性抑郁症患者的炎症标志物水平可能与其对抗抑郁治疗的反应有关。
招募年龄>60岁且首次出现抑郁发作(根据《国际疾病分类第十版研究诊断标准》定义)的个体。在基线时进行全面的临床评估、C反应蛋白(CRP)水平测定以及使用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD-17)进行抑郁严重程度评估。患者接受抗抑郁药物治疗,并在八周随访后重新评估HAMD中的抑郁严重程度。
研究样本(n = 25)的平均年龄为64.7±5.8岁,基线HAMD评分为18±3。抗抑郁治疗的总体有效率为24%。对抗抑郁治疗有反应的个体(n = 6)的平均年龄为63.5±4.9岁,其基线HAMD评分为16±1.9。对抗抑郁治疗部分有效或无效的个体(n = 19)的平均年龄为65.1±6.1岁,其基线HAMD评分为18.5±3.9。此外,基线CRP水平与抗抑郁反应性之间存在负相关(r = -0.6,p < 0.05)。
迟发性抑郁症对抗抑郁药物反应较差,抗抑郁反应率低与迟发性抑郁症中较高的CRP水平相关。