Suppr超能文献

使用微创旋转与往复式镍钛锉系统进行单次非手术再治疗后的术后疼痛:双臂平行随机临床试验

Postoperative Pain Following Single-Visit Nonsurgical Retreatment Using Minimally Invasive Rotary vs. Reciprocating Nickel-Titanium File Systems: A Two-Arm Parallel Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Güneç Hüseyin Gürkan, Pehlivan Büşra, Topbaş Celalettin, Kul Abdurrahman Kerim, Şirin Dursun Ali

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Hamidiye Faculty of Dentistry, University of Health Sciences, İstanbul, Türkiye.

出版信息

Pain Res Manag. 2025 Sep 8;2025:6826535. doi: 10.1155/prm/6826535. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

This study aimed to compare postoperative pain following the single-visit retreatment procedures of asymptomatic and symptomatic teeth using two different nickel-titanium file systems. Eighty patients were divided into symptomatic and asymptomatic groups, each further subdivided based on the use of rotary or reciprocating files. Retreatment involved removal of filling material with one flare and MicroMega REMOVER files, followed by shaping with one curve mini (rotary) or One RECI (reciprocating) files. Postoperative pain was recorded using a visual analogue scale (VAS) at 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 7 days, and 14 days. Data were analyzed using Shapiro-Wilk, Mann-Whitney , Kruskal-Wallis, Dunn-Bonferroni, and Pearson chi-square tests ( < 0.05). No significant differences in postoperative pain were found among the four groups. Pain levels were not associated with sex, age, or tooth position. Analgesic use significantly decreased over time in all groups except the asymptomatic rotary group. Patients requiring analgesics reported higher pain scores within the first 48 h ( < 0.05). Postoperative pain was low and comparable across all groups. File kinematics (rotary vs. reciprocating) did not influence pain outcomes. Single-visit retreatment is a viable alternative to multivisit procedures for both symptomatic and asymptomatic cases. This study supports the clinical feasibility of single-visit root canal retreatment, potentially improving patient comfort and reducing chair time. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06357481.

摘要

本研究旨在比较使用两种不同镍钛锉系统对无症状和有症状牙齿进行单次复诊再治疗术后的疼痛情况。80例患者被分为有症状组和无症状组,每组再根据使用旋转锉或往复锉进一步细分。再治疗包括用一支扩孔钻和MicroMega REMOVER锉去除充填材料,然后用一支One Curve mini(旋转)或One RECI(往复)锉进行根管预备。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)在术后24小时、48小时、72小时、7天和14天记录疼痛情况。采用Shapiro-Wilk检验、Mann-Whitney检验、Kruskal-Wallis检验、Dunn-Bonferroni检验和Pearson卡方检验(P<0.05)对数据进行分析。四组之间术后疼痛无显著差异。疼痛程度与性别、年龄或牙齿位置无关。除无症状旋转锉组外,所有组中镇痛药的使用随时间显著减少。需要使用镇痛药的患者在最初48小时内疼痛评分较高(P<0.05)。所有组术后疼痛均较低且相当。锉的运动方式(旋转与往复)不影响疼痛结果。对于有症状和无症状病例,单次复诊再治疗是多次复诊治疗的可行替代方法。本研究支持单次根管再治疗的临床可行性,可能会提高患者舒适度并减少椅旁时间。ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT06357481。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c75/12436016/a14009031620/PRM2025-6826535.001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验