Coman Briar, Powell Dylan, Das Julia, Graham Lisa, Mason Rachel, Harrison Mark, Rae Glen, Vitorio Rodrigo, Godfrey Alan, Stuart Samuel
From the: Department of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
Department of Computer and Information Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
Physiother Can. 2024 Aug;76(3):295-306. doi: 10.3138/ptc-2022-0050. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
Following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), patients are often advised to restrict physical activity until full symptom resolution followed by gradual return to activity. However, extended rest periods may prolong recovery and contribute to persistent symptoms. Emerging evidence suggests early active rehabilitation that increases heart rate without exacerbating symptoms may improve mTBI patient recovery. This review aims to: (1) appraise evidence on active rehabilitation intervention for mTBI recovery within one-month of injury (i.e., exercise type, duration, intensity, etc.); and (2) recommend evidence-based rehabilitation protocols.
Pubmed, CINAHL, PsychARTICLES, SportDISCUS, and AMED databases were searched using key terms "mild Traumatic Brain Injury", "Rehabilitation", "Acute", and their synonyms. Evidence was appraised using Cochrane RoB-2 and ROBINS-I.
434 citations were initially identified with seven papers systematically reviewed. Within the reviewed articles, only three were randomized controlled trials with low risk of bias, and four were non-randomized trials with low to moderate risk of bias. Findings highlighted that a range of active rehabilitation protocols were used with different exercise modalities (primarily treadmills and static cycling), durations (9-20 min, or until symptomatic, for 30-50 days or symptoms resolved), and intensities (low, moderate or high). Active rehabilitation did not cause any serious adverse events (i.e., death, hospitalisation etc.), and six studies reported that it did not exacerbate mTBI symptoms in any participants (with one participant having symptom worsening in one study). Overall, the majority of reviewed studies ( = 4) showed that active rehabilitation decreased time to mTBI symptom resolution compared to controls (strict rest/stretching exercises).
Individualized active rehabilitation prescribed within one-month post-mTBI appears to be safe and effective at decreasing recovery time to symptom resolution in mTBI. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding specific intervention protocols that needs to be addressed before adoption within clinical practice.
轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)后,通常建议患者限制身体活动,直至症状完全缓解,随后逐渐恢复活动。然而,延长休息时间可能会延长康复时间,并导致症状持续存在。新出现的证据表明,早期主动康复在不加重症状的情况下提高心率,可能会改善mTBI患者的康复情况。本综述旨在:(1)评估伤后1个月内针对mTBI康复的主动康复干预证据(即运动类型、持续时间、强度等);(2)推荐基于证据的康复方案。
使用关键词“轻度创伤性脑损伤”、“康复”、“急性”及其同义词检索PubMed、CINAHL、PsychARTICLES、SportDISCUS和AMED数据库。使用Cochrane RoB-2和ROBINS-I评估证据。
最初识别出434篇引文,系统综述了7篇论文。在综述的文章中,只有3篇是偏倚风险低的随机对照试验,4篇是偏倚风险低至中度的非随机试验。研究结果强调,使用了一系列主动康复方案,包括不同的运动方式(主要是跑步机和静态自行车)、持续时间(9 - 20分钟,或直至出现症状,持续30 - 50天或症状缓解)和强度(低、中或高)。主动康复未导致任何严重不良事件(即死亡、住院等),6项研究报告称,在任何参与者中均未加重mTBI症状(一项研究中有一名参与者症状恶化)。总体而言,大多数综述研究(n = 4)表明,与对照组(严格休息/伸展运动)相比,主动康复缩短了mTBI症状缓解的时间。
mTBI后1个月内进行个体化主动康复,在缩短mTBI症状缓解的恢复时间方面似乎是安全有效的。然而,在临床实践中采用之前,对于具体的干预方案缺乏共识,这一问题需要解决。