• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用聚-4-羟基丁酸酯(P4HB)补片进行肿瘤性疝修补的临床结果。

Clinical outcomes of oncologic hernia repair using Poly-4-Hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) mesh.

作者信息

Levy Jacob, Wagner Benjamin D, Shammas Ronnie L, Boe Lillian A, Ariyan Charlotte E, Brady Mary S, Allen Robert J, Matros Evan, Mehrara Babak J, Nelson Jonas A

机构信息

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Hernia. 2025 Sep 17;29(1):274. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03468-8.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-025-03468-8
PMID:40960565
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Hernia repair following cancer surgery is often challenging due to prior radiation therapy, malnutrition, and immunosuppression. Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) is a biosynthetic mesh that balances strength and biocompatibility, potentially optimizing outcomes in this high-risk population. This study aimed to evaluate recurrence and surgical site complications associated with P4HB mesh in oncologic patients undergoing incisional hernia repair and to identify surgical techniques related to improved outcomes.

METHODS

Patients with previous oncologic abdominal or pelvic surgery who developed an incisional hernia and underwent surgical repair using P4HB from January 2018 to December 2023 were identified. Patients were analyzed according to wound classification. Primary outcomes included hernia recurrence and surgical site complications (hematoma, infection/cellulitis, superficial wound dehiscence, and abscess formation).

RESULTS

102 patients [median (IQR) age 63 (55-69) years; median BMI 26 (23-30) kg/m] were included, with a median follow-up of 26.1 (15.1-40.1) months. The overall recurrence rate was 8.8%, significantly differing between clean (Class I) and contaminated (Class II-IV) cases (0% vs. 17%, p = 0.003). Surgical complications occurred in 24% of patients, with seroma (8.8%) and superficial wound dehiscence (7.8%) being the most common, and complication rates comparable between wound classifications. Bilateral external oblique release (HR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04-0.65; p = 0.01) and retrorectus mesh placement (HR, 0.05; 95% CI, 0.01-0.36; p = 0.004) were independently associated with reduced recurrence.

CONCLUSION

P4HB mesh in incisional hernia repair for oncologic patients yields low recurrence rates and acceptable complication rates. Bilateral external oblique release and retrorectus mesh placement are surgical techniques significantly associated with improved outcomes.

摘要

引言

由于先前的放射治疗、营养不良和免疫抑制,癌症手术后的疝修补术往往具有挑战性。聚-4-羟基丁酸酯(P4HB)是一种生物合成补片,可平衡强度和生物相容性,有可能优化这一高危人群的治疗效果。本研究旨在评估接受切口疝修补术的肿瘤患者中与P4HB补片相关的复发情况和手术部位并发症,并确定与改善治疗效果相关的手术技术。

方法

确定2018年1月至2023年12月期间因先前的腹部或盆腔肿瘤手术而发生切口疝并使用P4HB进行手术修补的患者。根据伤口分类对患者进行分析。主要结局包括疝复发和手术部位并发症(血肿、感染/蜂窝织炎、浅表伤口裂开和脓肿形成)。

结果

纳入102例患者[年龄中位数(IQR)为63(55-69)岁;BMI中位数为26(23-30)kg/m²],中位随访时间为26.1(15.1-40.1)个月。总体复发率为8.8%,清洁(I类)和污染(II-IV类)病例之间有显著差异(0%对17%,p = 0.003)。24%的患者发生手术并发症,其中血清肿(8.8%)和浅表伤口裂开(7.8%)最为常见,不同伤口分类的并发症发生率相当。双侧腹外斜肌松解术(HR,0.16;95%CI,0.04-0.65;p = 0.01)和腹直肌后补片放置(HR,0.05;95%CI,0.01-0.36;p = 0.004)与复发率降低独立相关。

结论

P4HB补片用于肿瘤患者的切口疝修补术复发率低,并发症发生率可接受。双侧腹外斜肌松解术和腹直肌后补片放置是与改善治疗效果显著相关的手术技术。

相似文献

1
Clinical outcomes of oncologic hernia repair using Poly-4-Hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) mesh.使用聚-4-羟基丁酸酯(P4HB)补片进行肿瘤性疝修补的临床结果。
Hernia. 2025 Sep 17;29(1):274. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03468-8.
2
The use of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB, Phasix™) mesh in ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.聚 4-羟基丁酸酯(P4HB,Phasix™)网片在腹疝修补中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2024 Aug;28(4):989-1004. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-02996-z. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
3
Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.用于腹股沟疝和股疝修补的补片与非补片对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 13;9(9):CD011517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2.
4
Mesh-reinforced compared with primary closure in emergent laparotomies for incarcerated ventral incisional hernias: Is the added complexity justified?在急诊剖腹手术治疗嵌顿性腹直肌切口疝中,与一期缝合相比,使用补片加强修补:增加的复杂性是否合理?
Surgery. 2025 Sep;185:109536. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2025.109536. Epub 2025 Jul 10.
5
Drain versus no drain in elective open incisional hernia repair: a propensity score matching analysis using the ACHQC database.择期开放性切口疝修补术中引流与不引流的比较:使用ACHQC数据库的倾向评分匹配分析
Hernia. 2025 Aug 29;29(1):261. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03439-z.
6
Early outcomes of contaminated midline incisional hernia repair with mesh suture.采用网片缝合修复污染性中线切口疝的早期结果
Hernia. 2025 Aug 4;29(1):247. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03422-8.
7
Biosynthetic compared with synthetic mesh in retrorectus ventral hernia repair: A matched analysis with 3-year outcomes.腹直肌后鞘腹疝修补术中生物合成补片与合成补片的比较:一项3年随访结果的配对分析。
Surgery. 2025 Oct;186:109579. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2025.109579. Epub 2025 Jul 19.
8
Prospective evaluation of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate mesh in CDC class I/high-risk ventral and incisional hernia repair: 18-month follow-up.前瞻性评估聚-4-羟基丁酸酯网在 CDC Ⅰ/高危腹侧和切口疝修复中的应用:18 个月随访结果。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Apr;32(4):1929-1936. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5886-1. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
9
Mesh versus non-mesh for emergency groin hernia repair.网片修补与非网片修补用于急诊腹股沟疝修补术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):CD015160. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015160.pub2.
10
Current state of laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair: A meta-analysis.腹腔镜造口旁疝修补术的现状:一项荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jul 28;21(28):8670-7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i28.8670.

本文引用的文献

1
Year-Over-Year Ventral Hernia Recurrence Rates and Risk Factors.年度对比性腹疝复发率及危险因素。
JAMA Surg. 2024 Jun 1;159(6):651-658. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.0233.
2
The use of poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB, Phasix™) mesh in ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.聚 4-羟基丁酸酯(P4HB,Phasix™)网片在腹疝修补中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2024 Aug;28(4):989-1004. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-02996-z. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
3
Long-Term Outcomes in Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Repaired With Absorbable Biologic Polymer Scaffold (Poly-4-Hydroxybutyrate).
使用可吸收生物聚合物支架(聚-4-羟基丁酸酯)修复复杂腹壁重建的长期结果
Ann Surg Open. 2021 Mar 11;2(1):e032. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000032. eCollection 2021 Mar.
4
Component Separation Decreases Hernia Recurrence Rates in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction with Biologic Mesh.生物补片在腹壁重建中的应用:成分分离降低疝复发率。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Mar 1;153(3):717-726. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010810. Epub 2023 Jun 6.
5
Long-Term, Prospective, Multicenter Study of Poly-4-Hydroxybutyrate Mesh (Phasix Mesh) for Hernia Repair in Cohort at Risk for Complication: 60-Month Follow-Up.多聚 4-羟基丁酸酯网(Phasix 网)用于并发症风险队列疝修补的长期、前瞻性、多中心研究:60 个月随访。
J Am Coll Surg. 2022 Dec 1;235(6):894-904. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000363. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
6
Reoperation for Recurrence Up to 10 Years After Hernia Repair.疝修补术后 10 年内复发的再次手术。
JAMA. 2022 Mar 1;327(9):872-874. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.0744.
7
Favorable Outcomes After Retro-Rectus (Rives-Stoppa) Mesh Repair as Treatment for Noncomplex Ventral Abdominal Wall Hernia, a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.经 Retro-Rectus (Rives-Stoppa) 网片修补术治疗非复杂性腹前壁疝的有利结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2022 Jul 1;276(1):55-65. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005422. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
8
Biologic vs Synthetic Mesh for Single-stage Repair of Contaminated Ventral Hernias: A Randomized Clinical Trial.生物补片与合成补片一期修复污染性腹壁切口疝的随机对照临床试验
JAMA Surg. 2022 Apr 1;157(4):293-301. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2021.6902.
9
Resorbable Synthetic Ventral Hernia Repair in Contaminated Fields: Outcomes with Poly-4-Hydroxybutyrate Mesh.可吸收合成材料在污染环境下的腹壁疝修补术:聚-4-羟基丁酸酯网片的应用效果。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Dec 1;148(6):1367-1375. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008579.
10
Radiation-Induced Tissue Damage: Clinical Consequences and Current Treatment Options.辐射诱导的组织损伤:临床后果与当前治疗选择
Semin Plast Surg. 2021 Aug;35(3):181-188. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1731464. Epub 2021 Sep 10.