• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利氏腹股沟疝修补术后的慢性腹股沟疼痛:部分可吸收轻质补片与传统轻质补片及重质补片的比较

Chronic groin pain after Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair: partially absorbable light-weight mesh versus conventional light-weight versus heavy-weight mesh.

作者信息

Budney Sarah, Kleppe Kyle, Mancini Matthew, Mancini Greg, Phillips Melissa, McKnight Catherine, Griepentrog John, Reinhorn Michael, Fafaj Aldo, Blake Kaela E

机构信息

University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine, Knoxville, TN, 37920, USA.

Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, TN, 37920, USA.

出版信息

Hernia. 2025 Sep 17;29(1):275. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03469-7.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-025-03469-7
PMID:40960703
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Mesh properties are important contributing factors to chronic postoperative inguinal pain (CPIP) following Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Some studies show using a light-weight mesh (LWM, <50 g/m2) over heavy-weight mesh (HWM, >70 g/m2) may decrease CPIP. However, most studies do not distinguish between partially absorbable light-weight mesh (PA-LWM) and permanent LWM. This study compares the rates of CPIP between PA-LWM, LWM, and HWM after Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the ACHQC database from 2014 to 2024 was conducted for elective Lichtenstein repair of non-recurrent, unilateral inguinal hernias. Mesh was categorized as LWM <50 g/m2 or HWM ≥70 g/m2 distinguishing partially absorbable LWM. The primary outcome was the rate of CPIP at 6 months postoperatively for PA-LWM, LWM, and HWM.

RESULTS

319 patients met criteria for the study with 53 PA-LWM, 122 LWM, and 144 HWM patients. Baseline pain was highest in PA-LWM and lowest in HWM cohorts. At 6 months, 21% of PA-LWM, 21% of LWM, and 19% of HWM patients had chronic pain (p=0.93). This decreased to 3% for PA-LWM at 1-year, but remained approximately 20% for LWM and HWM (p = 0.045). The clinical recurrence rate at 1-year was 50% (2/4), 0% (0/8), and 0% (0/17) for PA-LWM, LWM, and HWM respectively (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study found that roughly 20% of patients have chronic pain at 6 months regardless of mesh weight or partially absorbable properties. While PA-LWM may decrease CPIP at 1 year, this may be accompanied with a higher clinical recurrence rate.

摘要

引言

补片特性是Lichtenstein腹股沟疝修补术后慢性腹股沟疼痛(CPIP)的重要影响因素。一些研究表明,使用轻质补片(LWM,<50 g/m2)而非重质补片(HWM,>70 g/m2)可能会降低CPIP。然而,大多数研究并未区分部分可吸收轻质补片(PA-LWM)和永久性LWM。本研究比较了Lichtenstein腹股沟疝修补术后PA-LWM、LWM和HWM之间的CPIP发生率。

方法

对2014年至2024年ACHQC数据库进行回顾性分析,纳入非复发性单侧腹股沟疝择期Lichtenstein修补术患者。补片分为LWM<50 g/m2或HWM≥70 g/m2,区分部分可吸收LWM。主要结局是PA-LWM、LWM和HWM术后6个月的CPIP发生率。

结果

319例患者符合研究标准,其中53例使用PA-LWM,122例使用LWM,144例使用HWM。PA-LWM组基线疼痛最高,HWM组最低。6个月时,21%的PA-LWM患者、21%的LWM患者和19%的HWM患者有慢性疼痛(p=0.93)。1年时PA-LWM组降至3%,但LWM组和HWM组仍约为20%(p=0.045)。PA-LWM组、LWM组和HWM组1年时的临床复发率分别为50%(2/4)、0%(0/8)和0%(0/17)(p=0.001)。

结论

本研究发现,无论补片重量或部分可吸收特性如何,约20%的患者在术后6个月有慢性疼痛。虽然PA-LWM可能在1年时降低CPIP,但可能伴随着更高的临床复发率。

相似文献

1
Chronic groin pain after Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair: partially absorbable light-weight mesh versus conventional light-weight versus heavy-weight mesh.利氏腹股沟疝修补术后的慢性腹股沟疼痛:部分可吸收轻质补片与传统轻质补片及重质补片的比较
Hernia. 2025 Sep 17;29(1):275. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03469-7.
2
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of lightweight versus heavyweight mesh in open inguinal hernia repair.系统评价和荟萃分析使用轻量型与重量型网片在开放式腹股沟疝修补术中的应用。
Br J Surg. 2012 Jan;99(1):29-37. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7718. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
3
Ilioinguinal Nerve Neurectomy is better than Preservation in Lichtenstein Hernia Repair: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis.髂腹股沟神经切除术优于李金斯坦疝修补术中的保留:系统文献回顾和荟萃分析。
World J Surg. 2021 Jun;45(6):1750-1760. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-05968-x. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
4
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of open mesh repairs in adults presenting with a clinically diagnosed primary unilateral inguinal hernia who are operated in an elective setting: systematic review and economic evaluation.在择期手术环境下,对临床诊断为原发性单侧腹股沟疝的成人进行开放式网片修补术的临床有效性和成本效益:系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Nov;19(92):1-142. doi: 10.3310/hta19920.
5
Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.用于腹股沟疝和股疝修补的补片与非补片对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 13;9(9):CD011517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2.
6
Association of mesh weight with adverse outcomes: a cohort study including 123,880 inguinal hernia repairs.补片重量与不良结局的关联:一项纳入123,880例腹股沟疝修补术的队列研究。
Hernia. 2025 Aug 26;29(1):258. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03427-3.
7
A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the effectiveness of lightweight mesh against heavyweight mesh in influencing the incidence of chronic groin pain following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.系统评价和荟萃分析评估了在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后影响慢性腹股沟疼痛发生率方面,轻质网片相对于重质网片的有效性。
Am J Surg. 2013 Jun;205(6):726-36. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.07.046. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
8
Comparing large pore lightweight mesh versus small pore heavyweight mesh in open mesh plug repair of primary and recurrent unilateral inguinal hernia - A questionnaire study for a retrospective analysis of a cohort of elective groin hernia patients using propensity score matching.比较大孔轻质网与小孔重质网在原发性和复发性单侧腹股沟疝开放式网塞修补中的应用-使用倾向评分匹配对一组选择性腹股沟疝患者进行回顾性分析的问卷调查研究。
Int J Surg. 2020 Mar;75:93-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.01.130. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
9
The association of permanent versus absorbable fixation on developing chronic post-herniorrhaphy groin pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后永久性与可吸收固定对慢性腹股沟疝修补术后疼痛的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jun;38(6):3433-3440. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10866-z. Epub 2024 May 6.
10
Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair.经腹腹膜前(TAPP)与完全腹膜外(TEP)腹腔镜技术治疗腹股沟疝修补术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 4;7(7):CD004703. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004703.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Transinguinal preperitoneal (TIPP) versus minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经腹股沟腹膜前(TIPP)与微创腹股沟疝修补术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2024 Aug;28(4):1053-1061. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03091-z. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
2
Incidence and predictors of chronic pain after inguinal hernia surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹股沟疝手术后慢性疼痛的发生率及预测因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2024 Aug;28(4):967-987. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-02980-7. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
3
A Critical Appraisal of the Chronic Pain Rate After Inguinal Hernia Repair.
腹股沟疝修补术后慢性疼痛发生率的批判性评估
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2023 Jan 19;2:10972. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2023.10972. eCollection 2023.
4
Update of the international HerniaSurge guidelines for groin hernia management.国际疝外科学院腹股沟疝管理指南更新。
BJS Open. 2023 Sep 5;7(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad080.
5
Transinguinal preperitoneal (TIPP) versus Lichtenstein for inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经腹腹膜前修补术(TIPP)与平片无张力修补术(Lichtenstein)治疗腹股沟疝的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2023 Dec;27(6):1375-1385. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02882-0. Epub 2023 Sep 16.
6
Determining the Minimum Clinically Important Difference for the European Hernia Society Quality of Life Instrument in Inguinal Hernia Repair Patients.确定欧洲疝学会腹股沟疝修补患者生活质量量表的最小临床重要差异。
J Am Coll Surg. 2023 Sep 1;237(3):525-532. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000754. Epub 2023 May 12.
7
Open versus laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia: an overview of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials.腹股沟疝开放修补术与腹腔镜修补术:随机对照试验系统评价概述
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jul;36(7):4685-4700. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09161-6. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
8
Treatment of Inguinal Hernia: Systematic Review and Updated Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.腹股沟疝治疗:系统评价和随机对照试验的更新网络荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2021 Dec 1;274(6):954-961. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004735.
9
Lightweight mesh is recommended in open inguinal (Lichtenstein) hernia repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis.推荐在开放式腹股沟(Lichtenstein)疝修补术中使用轻质网片:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surgery. 2020 Mar;167(3):581-589. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.08.021. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
10
Open versus laparoscopic mesh repair of primary unilateral uncomplicated inguinal hernia: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.开放式与腹腔镜网片修补原发性单侧单纯腹股沟疝的比较:系统评价与荟萃分析及试验序贯分析。
Hernia. 2019 Jun;23(3):461-472. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01989-7. Epub 2019 Jun 3.