Hassan Noor, Zulqarnain Mir, Branstetter Chase, Fatima Ifrah, Mohamed Islam, Jahagirdar Vinay, Koyi Jagadish, Alsakarneh Saqr, Awad Ameen, Gautam Misha, Bader Abbas, Sripada Sruthi, Ahmed Mohamed, Muhanna Adel, Cunningham Thomas, Clarkston Wendell
Internal Medicine, University of Missouri Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Saint Luke's Health System, Kansas City, MO, USA.
Dig Dis Sci. 2025 Sep 17. doi: 10.1007/s10620-025-09371-7.
Pre-cardiac transplant evaluation, including colorectal cancer screening, is vital for organ allocation. Data on colonoscopy risks in transplant candidates are limited to retrospective analyses with varying methodologies. Literature assessing colonoscopy alone without esophagogastroduodenoscopy is even more limited. We studied adverse events and clinical outcomes of pre-transplant screening colonoscopy in patients stratified by ejection fraction (EF).
Charts were reviewed at Saint Luke's Hospital in Kansas City, Missouri, between 2014 and 2023. Cohorts were divided by EF: severe (EF < 30%) and non-severe (EF ≥ 30%). Demographics and clinical outcomes were compared using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests, with a p-value: < 0.05. Outcomes included adverse events and adenoma or colorectal cancer detection.
Among 322 patients, 231 had EF < 30% and 91 had EF ≥ 30%. Adverse events were similar in both cohorts (p > 0.05 for all). No severe events were observed during colonoscopy as classified by the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (Cotton et al. (2010) Gastrointest Endosc. 71:446-454) Adenoma detection rate in the EF ≥ 30% group was 37.1 and 26.6% in the EF < 30% group. Analysis showed no significant differences in adenoma detection (p = 0.08).
Our study provides new data on the safety and diagnostic performance of pre-transplant colonoscopy in patients with severe and non-severely reduced EF. While minor adverse events were commonly observed, no severe complications occurred during colonoscopy. Adverse clinical outcomes were comparable between cohorts regardless of EF severity, and severity did not appear to significantly impact detection of adenomas; however, bowel prep and colonoscopy were performed in a closely monitored, inpatient setting.
心脏移植前评估,包括结直肠癌筛查,对于器官分配至关重要。关于移植候选者结肠镜检查风险的数据仅限于采用不同方法的回顾性分析。仅评估结肠镜检查而不包括食管胃十二指肠镜检查的文献更为有限。我们研究了按射血分数(EF)分层的患者移植前筛查结肠镜检查的不良事件和临床结局。
回顾了2014年至2023年密苏里州堪萨斯城圣卢克医院的病历。队列按EF分为:重度(EF<30%)和非重度(EF≥30%)。使用描述性统计和卡方检验比较人口统计学和临床结局,p值<0.05。结局包括不良事件以及腺瘤或结直肠癌的检测。
在322例患者中,231例EF<30%,91例EF≥30%。两个队列中的不良事件相似(所有p>0.05)。根据美国胃肠内镜学会的分类(Cotton等人(2010年)《胃肠内镜》71:446 - 454),结肠镜检查期间未观察到严重事件。EF≥30%组的腺瘤检出率为37.1%,EF<30%组为26.6%。分析显示腺瘤检测无显著差异(p = 0.08)。
我们的研究提供了关于重度和非重度EF降低患者移植前结肠镜检查安全性和诊断性能的新数据。虽然常见轻微不良事件,但结肠镜检查期间未发生严重并发症。无论EF严重程度如何,队列间不良临床结局相当,且严重程度似乎未显著影响腺瘤的检测;然而,肠道准备和结肠镜检查是在密切监测的住院环境中进行的。