Cabarkapa Dimitrije, Batra Amit, Cabarkapa Damjana V, Fry Andrew C
Jayhawk Athletic Performance Laboratory, Wu Tsai Human Performance Alliance, Department of Health, Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, United States.
Faculty of Health Sciences and Physical Education, Kazimierz Wielki University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Front Sports Act Living. 2025 Sep 2;7:1672028. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2025.1672028. eCollection 2025.
The purpose of the present study was to examine and compare the lower-body neuromuscular performance characteristics of Olympic-level 100 m and 400 m sprinters. Following a standardized warm-up procedure, fourteen professional female athletes completed three countermovement vertical jumps with no arm swing, while standing on a uni-axial force plate system sampling at 1,000 Hz. Force-time metrics, expressed both in absolute (A) and relative (R) terms, were analyzed across braking (eccentric) and propulsive (concentric) phases of the jumping motion, including inter-limb asymmetry measures. Independent t-tests or Mann-Whitney tests were used to examine between-group statistically significant differences ( < 0.05). The results reveal that 100 m sprinters tend to display greater force and power-producing capabilities than their 400 m counterparts. Specifically, average braking power (A: 1,212.3 vs. 1,052.9 W), average propulsive power (A: 2,343.8 vs. 2,026.9 W), peak propulsive power (A: 4,030.1 vs. 3,503.5 W; R: 64.1 vs. 59.4 W·kg), average propulsive velocity (1.79 vs. 1.69 m·s), peak propulsive velocity (3.13 vs. 2.93 m·s), and jump height (47.8 vs. 41.4 cm) were all greater in 100 m than 400 m sprinters. In addition, average and peak braking and propulsive force inter-limb asymmetries remained below 10% in both groups, with no significant differences being observed. Therefore, these findings suggest that 100 m sprinters may benefit from training regimens focused on the development of force and power-producing capabilities, particularly through exercises that enhance the propulsive (concentric) phase of the movement, while 400 m sprinters may benefit from a more integrated training approach, focused on balancing speed development with strength-endurance components.
本研究的目的是检验和比较奥运会水平的100米和400米短跑运动员的下肢神经肌肉性能特征。在完成标准化热身程序后,14名职业女性运动员站在单轴测力板系统上,以1000赫兹的频率进行了三次无摆臂的反向垂直跳跃。在跳跃动作的制动(离心)和推进(向心)阶段分析了以绝对(A)和相对(R)形式表示的力-时间指标,包括肢体间不对称测量。使用独立t检验或曼-惠特尼检验来检验组间的统计学显著差异(<0.05)。结果显示,100米短跑运动员比400米短跑运动员往往表现出更大的力量和产生功率的能力。具体而言,100米短跑运动员的平均制动功率(A:1212.3瓦对1052.9瓦)、平均推进功率(A:2343.8瓦对2026.9瓦)、峰值推进功率(A:4030.1瓦对3503.5瓦;R:64.1瓦对59.4瓦·千克)、平均推进速度(1.79米·秒对1.69米·秒)、峰值推进速度(3.13米·秒对2.93米·秒)和跳跃高度(47.8厘米对41.4厘米)均高于400米短跑运动员。此外,两组的平均和峰值制动及推进力肢体间不对称均保持在10%以下,未观察到显著差异。因此,这些发现表明,100米短跑运动员可能受益于侧重于发展力量和产生功率能力的训练方案,特别是通过增强动作推进(向心)阶段的练习,而400米短跑运动员可能受益于更综合的训练方法,侧重于平衡速度发展与力量耐力成分。