• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

标签很重要:标签和诊断如何影响公众对有抑郁症状者的认知。

Label matters: how labeling and diagnosis affect lay perception of people with depressive symptoms.

作者信息

Kulwicka Katarzyna, Rusowicz Jagoda, Gasiorowska Agata

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology in Wroclaw, SWPS University, Wroclaw, Poland.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2025 Sep 2;16:1612517. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1612517. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1612517
PMID:40964427
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12436416/
Abstract

We investigated how the label "depression" and information about a medical diagnosis influence perceptions of individuals with depressive symptoms as legitimately experiencing depression and a medical condition. In three experiments, participants read a description of a person meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) criteria for major depressive episode and manipulated whether the label "depression" and the information about a professional medical diagnosis were included. Participants were more likely to perceive the person as having depression when both the label and diagnosis were present. However, paradoxically, when a diagnosis explicitly included the word "depression", participants were less likely to view the symptoms as indicating a legitimate medical condition than when the diagnosis omitted the term. These effects were not moderated by participants' own experience of depression. Gender effects emerged in Experiment 3: results replicated for male protagonists but differed for female protagonists, where label effects were independent of medical diagnosis information. Finally, a meta-analysis across the three experiments supported our hypothesis that the label "depression" weakened the effect of the medical diagnosis. Moreover, participants attributed a higher degree of legitimacy to a medical condition when the diagnosis was provided by a doctor, but only when this diagnosis did not include the label "depression".

摘要

我们研究了“抑郁症”这一标签以及关于医学诊断的信息如何影响人们对有抑郁症状的个体确实患有抑郁症及一种医学病症的认知。在三项实验中,参与者阅读了一个符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第五版)(DSM - 5)中重度抑郁发作标准的人的描述,并对是否包含“抑郁症”标签及关于专业医学诊断的信息进行了操控。当标签和诊断都存在时,参与者更有可能认为此人患有抑郁症。然而,自相矛盾的是,当诊断明确包含“抑郁症”一词时,与诊断省略该词的情况相比,参与者不太可能将这些症状视为表明一种合理的医学病症。这些效应并未因参与者自身的抑郁经历而有所缓和。在实验3中出现了性别效应:男性主角的结果得到了重复,但女性主角的结果有所不同,在女性主角中标签效应独立于医学诊断信息。最后,对这三项实验的荟萃分析支持了我们的假设,即“抑郁症”标签削弱了医学诊断的效果。此外,当诊断由医生给出时,参与者会赋予医学病症更高程度的合理性,但前提是该诊断不包含“抑郁症”标签。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b953/12436416/7bf156592b41/fpsyt-16-1612517-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b953/12436416/778265465819/fpsyt-16-1612517-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b953/12436416/f3fcbeb13654/fpsyt-16-1612517-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b953/12436416/6cc1017642b6/fpsyt-16-1612517-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b953/12436416/6ed2db7e42c9/fpsyt-16-1612517-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b953/12436416/422a4547cb1f/fpsyt-16-1612517-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b953/12436416/7bf156592b41/fpsyt-16-1612517-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b953/12436416/778265465819/fpsyt-16-1612517-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b953/12436416/f3fcbeb13654/fpsyt-16-1612517-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b953/12436416/6cc1017642b6/fpsyt-16-1612517-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b953/12436416/6ed2db7e42c9/fpsyt-16-1612517-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b953/12436416/422a4547cb1f/fpsyt-16-1612517-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b953/12436416/7bf156592b41/fpsyt-16-1612517-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Label matters: how labeling and diagnosis affect lay perception of people with depressive symptoms.标签很重要:标签和诊断如何影响公众对有抑郁症状者的认知。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Sep 2;16:1612517. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1612517. eCollection 2025.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
How Do Individuals Perceive Diagnostic Labels and Explanations for Hip Pain? A Qualitative Study Among Adults With Persistent Hip Pain.个体如何看待髋关节疼痛的诊断标签和解释?一项针对持续性髋关节疼痛成年人的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 5. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003445.
4
The Effect of Labeling During Simulated Contact on Attitudes Toward Autistic Adults.模拟接触过程中的标签对对待成年自闭症患者态度的影响。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 Feb 5;7(1):93-99. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0081. eCollection 2025 Feb.
5
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
6
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
7
Patient buy-in to social prescribing through link workers as part of person-centred care: a realist evaluation.患者通过联络人员接受社会处方作为以患者为中心的护理的一部分:一项现实主义评价。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep 25:1-17. doi: 10.3310/ETND8254.
8
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
9
Clinical judgement by primary care physicians for the diagnosis of all-cause dementia or cognitive impairment in symptomatic people.初级保健医生对有症状人群进行全因痴呆或认知障碍诊断的临床判断。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 16;6(6):CD012558. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012558.pub2.
10
Comparing Self-Perceptions, Meta-Perceptions, and Peer Judgments of the Academic Experience of Autistic and Non-Autistic University Students.比较自闭症和非自闭症大学生学术经历的自我认知、元认知及同伴评价。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 Aug 11;7(4):493-504. doi: 10.1089/aut.2024.0107. eCollection 2025 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Helpful or harmful? The effect of a diagnostic label and its later retraction on person impressions.有益还是有害?诊断标签及其后续撤回对人的印象的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2024 Aug;248:104420. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104420. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
2
The 'discontinuity hypothesis' of depression in later life-clinical and research implications.老年期抑郁的“不连续性假说”——临床与研究意义。
Age Ageing. 2023 Dec 1;52(12). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad239.
3
Have the concepts of 'anxiety' and 'depression' been normalized or pathologized? A corpus study of historical semantic change.
“焦虑”和“抑郁”的概念是否已经被常态化或病理化?基于语料库的历史语义变化研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 29;18(6):e0288027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288027. eCollection 2023.
4
Framing depression as a functional signal, not a disease: Rationale and initial randomized controlled trial.将抑郁视为一种功能性信号,而非一种疾病:原理与初步随机对照试验。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Jul;328:115995. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115995. Epub 2023 Jun 3.
5
Depression literacy and misconceptions scale (DepSter): a new two-factorial tool for measuring beliefs about depression.抑郁知识和误解量表(DepSter):一种新的两因素工具,用于测量对抑郁的信念。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 May 1;23(1):300. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04796-8.
6
Associations between college students' personal experience with mental health issues and their mental health literacy: a strengths-based perspective.大学生个人心理健康问题经历与心理健康素养的关系:基于优势视角。
J Ment Health. 2024 Feb;33(1):118-126. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2022.2069692. Epub 2022 May 12.
7
Trends in Public Stigma of Mental Illness in the US, 1996-2018.美国公众对精神疾病污名化的趋势,1996-2018 年。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2140202. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.40202.
8
How does diagnostic labelling affect social responses to people with mental illness? A systematic review of experimental studies using vignette-based designs.诊断标签如何影响社会对精神病患者的反应?基于情景设计的实验研究的系统评价。
J Ment Health. 2022 Feb;31(1):115-130. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2021.1922653. Epub 2021 May 19.
9
The Economic Burden of Adults with Major Depressive Disorder in the United States (2010 and 2018).美国患有重度抑郁症的成年人的经济负担(2010 年和 2018 年)。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Jun;39(6):653-665. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01019-4. Epub 2021 May 5.
10
Is the US Gender Gap in Depression Changing Over Time? A Meta-Regression.美国抑郁的性别差距是否随时间变化?一项元回归分析。
Am J Epidemiol. 2021 Jul 1;190(7):1190-1206. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwab002.