Houtkamp Dax, Pool-Goudzwaard Annelies L, Takken Tim, Chettouf Sabrina, Van de Wiel Albert, Bautmans Ivan, Bongers Bart C
SOMT University of Physiotherapy, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2025 Sep 18. doi: 10.1007/s00421-025-05978-w.
Accurate interpretation of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) requires reference values that account for sex, age, and body composition. Existing reference values often lack these distinctions or exclude older adults. This study aimed to establish sex- and age-specific reference values for absolute and relative (body mass-corrected and lean body mass-corrected) CRF parameters derived from cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in Dutch community-dwelling 55- to 75-year-old adults.
Cross-sectional data from 611 participants of the AMCOHF study were analyzed. CRF was assessed via cycle ergometer CPET evaluating oxygen uptake (V̇O) and work rate (WR) at peak exercise, oxygen uptake at the ventilatory anaerobic threshold (V̇O), and oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES). Body mass and lean body mass were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Reference values stratified by sex and age were developed using generalized additive models. Prediction equations were generated using multiple linear regression. Correlations with V̇O assessed the usefulness of V̇O and OUES as submaximal and effort-independent alternatives for CRF.
All CRF variables declined with age. V̇O (L/min) declined quasi-linearly (females: 1.3%/year; males: 2.5%/year). Significant sex differences were observed between all CRF variables (absolute and body mass-corrected values: p < 0.001; lean body mass-corrected values: p < 0.05). Significant correlations were found between V̇O and WR (ρ = 0.90), V̇O (ρ = 0.78), and OUES (ρ = 0.87).
This study provides reference values for V̇O, WR, V̇O, and OUES in Dutch older adults aged 55-75 years during cycle ergometer CPET, offering a unique dataset for assessing CRF and monitoring intervention effects.
准确解读心肺适能(CRF)需要考虑性别、年龄和身体成分的参考值。现有的参考值往往缺乏这些区分,或者将老年人排除在外。本研究旨在为荷兰55至75岁社区居住成年人通过心肺运动试验(CPET)得出的绝对和相对(体重校正和瘦体重校正)CRF参数建立性别和年龄特异性参考值。
分析了AMCOHF研究中611名参与者的横断面数据。通过自行车测力计CPET评估CRF,评估峰值运动时的摄氧量(V̇O)和工作率(WR)、通气无氧阈时的摄氧量(V̇O)以及摄氧效率斜率(OUES)。使用双能X线吸收法测量体重和瘦体重。使用广义相加模型建立按性别和年龄分层的参考值。使用多元线性回归生成预测方程。与V̇O的相关性评估了V̇O和OUES作为CRF的次最大和与努力无关替代指标的有用性。
所有CRF变量均随年龄下降。V̇O(L/min)呈准线性下降(女性:每年1.3%;男性:每年2.5%)。在所有CRF变量之间观察到显著的性别差异(绝对和体重校正值:p < 0.001;瘦体重校正值:p < 0.05)。在V̇O与WR(ρ = 0.90)、V̇O(ρ = 0.78)和OUES(ρ = 0.87)之间发现显著相关性。
本研究提供了荷兰55至75岁老年人在自行车测力计CPET期间V̇O、WR、V̇O和OUES的参考值,为评估CRF和监测干预效果提供了一个独特的数据集。