Cuttance E L, Mason W A, Bryan M A, Laven R A
EpiVets, 565 Mahoe Street, Te Awamutu, New Zealand.
EpiVets, 565 Mahoe Street, Te Awamutu, New Zealand.
Vet J. 2025 Sep 16;314:106439. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2025.106439.
Tail damage in dairy cattle is an increasingly recognised cause of poor welfare. However, there have been very few studies of the risk factors associated with the prevalence of tail damage. This analysis combined a 200-farm study of the prevalence of tail damage in New Zealand with a survey of farm management and handling practice with the aim of identifying the risk factors associated with tail damage (defined as either a deviated tail or one with evidence of other injury). Across the farms, the median herd level prevalence of tail damage was 11.5 %. The survey included 42 variables which were analysed at the univariable level. Factors which were identified as being potentially associated based on these univariable analyses included region, parlour type, milking frequency, use of automatic cup removers, use of coaxing to get cows to move and farmer's opinion of how many cows with tail damage they had. The final multivariable model had region, milking frequency (odds of tail damage 1.18 times higher for farms which always milked cows twice daily than for those which did not) and the use of coaxing (i.e. gentle persuasion) (odds of tail damage on farms which used coaxing was 0.83 times that on farms which did not). These results support the hypothesis that poor handling and/or interaction with infrastructure are important causes of tail damage on New Zealand dairy farms. More studies in more countries are needed to better understand the cause of tail damage in dairy cows. In addition, we need to standardise and optimise the repeatability of tail scoring.
奶牛的尾巴损伤是一个越来越被认可的导致福利不佳的原因。然而,关于与尾巴损伤发生率相关的风险因素的研究却非常少。本分析将新西兰一项对200个农场尾巴损伤发生率的研究与一项农场管理和处理实践调查相结合,目的是确定与尾巴损伤(定义为尾巴弯曲或有其他受伤迹象)相关的风险因素。在这些农场中,尾巴损伤的牛群中位发生率为11.5%。该调查包括42个变量,并在单变量水平上进行了分析。基于这些单变量分析确定的可能相关因素包括地区、挤奶厅类型、挤奶频率、自动脱杯器的使用、使用哄赶方式让奶牛移动以及农民对其农场中尾巴损伤奶牛数量的看法。最终的多变量模型包含地区、挤奶频率(每天总是给奶牛挤奶两次的农场尾巴损伤几率比不这样做的农场高1.18倍)以及哄赶方式(即温和劝说)的使用(使用哄赶方式的农场尾巴损伤几率是不使用哄赶方式农场的0.83倍)。这些结果支持了以下假设:不良的处理方式和/或与基础设施的相互作用是新西兰奶牛场尾巴损伤的重要原因。需要在更多国家开展更多研究,以更好地了解奶牛尾巴损伤的原因。此外,我们需要对尾巴评分的可重复性进行标准化和优化。