Ellinwood E H, Heatherly D G
Accid Anal Prev. 1985 Aug;17(4):283-90. doi: 10.1016/0001-4575(85)90028-4.
The adverse effects of minor tranquilizers, and more specifically benzodiazepines, on psychomotor and cognitive performance have been documented repeatedly over the years, and epidemiological studies have provided sufficient evidence of their role in traffic accidents. These studies indicate that drug plasma level (DPL) is insufficiently correlated with impairment and that other factors need to be considered in determining the impairment vulnerability. This report reviews several sources of individual variability, particularly as they relate to differential impairment effects. These sources, which include such factors as acute peak effects, acute tolerance, chronic tolerance, benzodiazepine receptor affinity and individual sensitivity, need to be examined before quantification of DPL is introduced as a criterion for driving under the influence. Behavioral testing itself may become the critical means of assessing drug- and/or drug with alcohol-induced driving impairment if acceptable standardized procedures can be developed. Attention is drawn to the rapid onset of impairment associated with acute effects of more lipid soluble drugs. The discussion of impairment of benzodiazepines should be seen in the perspective of their relative overall safety compared to other drugs used as minor tranquilizers.
多年来,已有文献反复记载了弱安定药,尤其是苯二氮䓬类药物对精神运动和认知能力的不良影响,并且流行病学研究已提供了充分证据证明其在交通事故中所起的作用。这些研究表明,药物血浆水平(DPL)与损害之间的相关性不足,并且在确定损害易感性时还需要考虑其他因素。本报告回顾了个体差异的几个来源,尤其是与不同损害效应相关的差异。在将DPL定量作为影响驾驶的标准之前,需要对这些来源进行研究,这些来源包括急性峰值效应、急性耐受性、慢性耐受性、苯二氮䓬受体亲和力和个体敏感性等因素。如果能够制定出可接受的标准化程序,行为测试本身可能会成为评估药物和/或药物与酒精共同导致的驾驶损害的关键手段。需要注意的是,与脂溶性更高的药物的急性效应相关的损害发作迅速。与用作弱安定药的其他药物相比,苯二氮䓬类药物的相对总体安全性应成为讨论其损害问题的背景。