Suppr超能文献

成人中口服营养补充剂预防呼吸道感染的比较效果:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析

Comparative effectiveness of oral nutritional supplements in preventing respiratory tract infections among adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Zhu Zhixin, Zhu Xiaoxia, Chu Yanru, Zhang Bing, Chen Yi

机构信息

Ningbo Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Ningbo Key Laboratory of Virus Research, Ningbo, 315010, PR China.

School of Medicine, Ningbo University, 818 Fenghua Road, Ningbo, 315211, PR China.

出版信息

EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Sep 2;88:103479. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103479. eCollection 2025 Oct.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Different nutritional supplements may prevent respiratory tract infections (RTIs) in adults, but their comparative effectiveness remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of oral nutritional supplements in preventing RTIs and reducing their symptom duration and severity.

METHODS

In this systematic review and network meta-analysis, we searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing oral micronutrients, flavonoids, probiotics, or synbiotics in adults for the prevention of RTIs in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to February 25, 2025. Studies with participants under 18 years, immunodeficiencies, non-oral administration, or a therapeutic rather than preventive focus were excluded. We performed network meta-analyses (NMA) using frequentist random-effects models to compare interventions through direct and indirect evidence. We used the CINeMA framework to rate the overall certainty of evidence. The primary outcome was the incidence of RTIs. The secondary outcomes were upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) or common cold, COVID-19 or influenza, RTI symptom duration, RTI symptom severity, and adverse events. The study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD420250653276.

FINDINGS

We identified 120 eligible trials, among which 107 trials involving 101,751 adults were included in the network meta-analysis. Compared with placebo, catechin (RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.66, 0.95; n = 5; high certainty), (RR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.63, 0.99; n = 3; moderate certainty), and multi-strain probiotics (RR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.82, 0.98; n = 16; moderate certainty) were the most effective interventions for reducing RTI incidence. For COVID-19 or influenza prevention, high-dose vitamin D was highly effective (RR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.51, 0.86; n = 9; moderate certainty). Catechin (MD = -2.64 days/RTI, 95% CI: -4.92, -0.35; n = 2; moderate certainty) and multi-strain probiotics (MD = -0.97 days/RTI, 95% CI: -1.78, -0.16; n = 4; high certainty) most effectively shortened RTI symptom duration. Multi-strain probiotics (SMD = -0.33, 95% CI: -0.51, -0.14; n = 6; moderate certainty) also showed superior performance in alleviating RTI symptom severity. None of the interventions increased the risk of adverse events versus placebo.

INTERPRETATION

Based on the current evidence, catechin, , and multi-strain probiotics show relatively better effects in preventing adult RTI compared to other nutritional supplements. For COVID-19 or influenza prevention, high-dose vitamin D supplementation may be more effective. This study is limited by the lack of head-to-head comparisons between interventions (particularly across major categories) and heterogeneity from varied administration methods (e.g., capsules, beverages, mouthwashes), impacting the consistency and overall estimation of the NMA. Future high-quality studies are needed to provide direct evidence on the optimal intervention type, frequency, and form/dose of administration to guide clinical practice effectively.

FUNDING

This work was supported by the Ningbo Top Medical and Health Research Program and the Zhejiang Provincial Disease Prevention and Control Science and Technology Plan.

摘要

背景

不同的营养补充剂可能预防成人呼吸道感染(RTIs),但其相对有效性仍不明确。我们旨在评估口服营养补充剂在预防RTIs以及缩短其症状持续时间和减轻症状严重程度方面的有效性。

方法

在这项系统评价和网状Meta分析中,我们在PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Central Register和ClinicalTrials.gov数据库中检索了从建库至2025年2月25日评估口服微量营养素、类黄酮、益生菌或合生元预防成人RTIs的随机对照试验(RCTs)。排除参与者年龄在18岁以下、存在免疫缺陷、非口服给药或重点为治疗而非预防的研究。我们使用频率学派随机效应模型进行网状Meta分析(NMA),通过直接和间接证据比较干预措施。我们使用CINeMA框架对证据的总体确定性进行评级。主要结局是RTIs的发病率。次要结局是上呼吸道感染(URTIs)或普通感冒、新冠病毒感染或流感、RTI症状持续时间、RTI症状严重程度和不良事件。该研究已在PROSPERO注册,注册号为CRD420250653276。

结果

我们识别出120项符合条件的试验,其中107项涉及101,751名成人的试验被纳入网状Meta分析。与安慰剂相比,儿茶素(RR = 0.79,95%CI:0.66,0.95;n = 5;高确定性)、[此处原文缺失部分内容](RR = 0.79,95%CI:0.63,0.99;n = 3;中等确定性)和多菌株益生菌(RR = 0.90,95%CI:0.82,0.98;n = 16;中等确定性)是降低RTI发病率最有效的干预措施。对于预防新冠病毒感染或流感,高剂量维生素D非常有效(RR = 0.66,95%CI:0.51,0.86;n = 9;中等确定性)。儿茶素(MD = -2.64天/RTI,95%CI:-4.92,-0.35;n = 2;中等确定性)和多菌株益生菌(MD = -0.97天/RTI,95%CI:-1.78,-0.16;n = 4;高确定性)最有效地缩短了RTI症状持续时间。多菌株益生菌(SMD = -0.33,95%CI:-0.51,-0.14;n = 6;中等确定性)在减轻RTI症状严重程度方面也表现出优势。与安慰剂相比,没有一种干预措施增加不良事件风险。

解读

基于目前的证据,与其他营养补充剂相比,儿茶素、[此处原文缺失部分内容]和多菌株益生菌在预防成人RTIs方面显示出相对更好的效果。对于预防新冠病毒感染或流感,补充高剂量维生素D可能更有效。本研究受到干预措施之间缺乏直接比较(特别是在主要类别之间)以及不同给药方式(如胶囊、饮料、漱口水)导致的异质性的限制,影响了NMA的一致性和总体估计。需要未来的高质量研究提供关于最佳干预类型、频率以及给药形式/剂量的直接证据,以有效指导临床实践。

资助

本研究得到宁波市医疗卫生顶尖人才培养工程和浙江省疾病预防控制科技计划的支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8d9/12441711/d1a6a2c4e1fa/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验