Galvin James E, Salcedo Andres
Department of Neurology, Comprehensive Center for Brain Health, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 7700 W Camino Real, Suite 200, Boca Raton, FL, 33433, USA.
Neurol Ther. 2025 Sep 19. doi: 10.1007/s40120-025-00822-x.
Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), a common cause of dementia, has no FDA-approved therapies, and clinical trials to date have had limited ability to demonstrate efficacy. The lack of validated DLB-specific clinical trial outcomes may hinder these efforts. Here, we test whether the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) and other commonly used clinical evaluation tools for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD) could potentially be used as outcome measures in future DLB clinical trials.
A retrospective, cross-sectional chart review of 600 patients (359 AD, 241 DLB) who completed a comprehensive clinical, cognitive, functional, and behavioral evaluation over a 10-year period was carried out. Performance of the CDR, its sum of boxes (CDR-SB), and other AD and PD evaluation measures were assessed for stage-wide performance from mild cognitive impairment (CDR 0.5) to moderate-severe dementia (CDR 2).
The CDR and CDR-SB characterize important differences between AD and DLB across different cross-sectional stages of disease severity, with the greatest differences seen at the CDR 0.5 stage. DLB showed greater deficits in commonly used AD functional and behavioral measures at the CDR 0.5 stage, while more DLB-specific measures showed significant differences from AD across the entire disease spectrum. The patient version of the Quick Dementia Rating System showed greater stage-wide impairment in DLB than AD, supporting its use as a patient-reported outcome. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment showed greater stage-wide impairment in AD than in DLB patients, suggesting lack of sensitivity as an outcome measure for DLB clinical trials.
Improved study design and selection of appropriate outcome measures in DLB clinical trials can facilitate demonstration of efficacy. While the CDR-SB could work on a DLB clinical trial, the field would be most advanced by the development of a DLB-specific global rating instrument.
路易体痴呆(DLB)是痴呆的常见病因,目前尚无美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的治疗方法,且迄今为止的临床试验证明疗效的能力有限。缺乏经过验证的DLB特异性临床试验结果可能会阻碍这些努力。在此,我们测试临床痴呆评定量表(CDR)以及其他常用于阿尔茨海默病(AD)和帕金森病(PD)的临床评估工具是否有可能在未来的DLB临床试验中用作结局指标。
对600例患者(359例AD、241例DLB)进行回顾性横断面图表审查,这些患者在10年期间完成了全面的临床、认知、功能和行为评估。评估了CDR及其分项总和(CDR-SB)以及其他AD和PD评估措施在从轻度认知障碍(CDR 0.5)到中度至重度痴呆(CDR 2)的全病程阶段的表现。
CDR和CDR-SB在疾病严重程度的不同横断面阶段表征了AD和DLB之间的重要差异,在CDR 0.5阶段差异最大。在CDR 0.5阶段,DLB在常用的AD功能和行为测量方面表现出更大的缺陷,而更多DLB特异性测量在整个疾病谱中与AD存在显著差异。快速痴呆评定系统的患者版显示DLB在全病程阶段的损害比AD更大,支持其作为患者报告结局的应用。蒙特利尔认知评估显示AD患者在全病程阶段的损害比DLB患者更大,表明其作为DLB临床试验结局指标缺乏敏感性。
在DLB临床试验中改进研究设计并选择合适的结局指标有助于证明疗效。虽然CDR-SB可用于DLB临床试验,但开发一种DLB特异性的整体评定工具将使该领域取得最大进展。