From the Department of Neurosciences (D.G.C., I.L., D.G.), University of California San Diego; Clinical Laboratory (K.R.M., J.S.M.), Amprion Inc., La Jolla, CA; Department of Neurology (A.C.B.), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC; Department of Neurology (J.E.G.), University of Miami, FL; Department of Neurology (D.J.I.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia; Department of Neurology (C.F.L.), Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Neurology (O.L.L., S.B.), University of Pittsburgh, PA; Department of Neurology (D.W.T., C.P.Z.), University of Washington and Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA; Department of Neurology (L.S.H., K.S.M.), Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY; Department of Neurology (J.E.F.), Rush University, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (M.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, AZ; Department of Neurology (D.W., L.B., J.B.L.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Lewy Body Dementia Association (A.S.T.), Lilburn, GA.
Neurology. 2024 Aug 13;103(3):e209656. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209656. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
The clinical diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) depends on identifying significant cognitive decline accompanied by core features of parkinsonism, visual hallucinations, cognitive fluctuations, and REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD). Hyposmia is one of the several supportive features. α-Synuclein seeding amplification assays (αSyn-SAAs) may enhance diagnostic accuracy by detecting pathologic αSyn seeds in CSF. In this study, we examine how different clinical features associate with CSF αSyn-SAA positivity in a large group of clinically diagnosed participants with DLB.
Cross-sectional and longitudinal CSF samples from the multicentered observational cohort study of the DLB Consortium and similar studies within the Parkinson's Disease Biomarker Program, contributed by academic medical centers in the United States, underwent αSyn-SAA testing. Participants included those clinically diagnosed with DLB and 2 control cohorts. Associations between core DLB features and olfaction with αSyn-SAA positivity were evaluated using logistic regression.
CSF samples from 191 participants diagnosed with DLB (mean age 69.9 ± 6.8, 15% female), 50 age-matched and sex-matched clinical control participants, and 49 younger analytical control participants were analyzed. Seventy-two percent (137/191) of participants with DLB had positive αSyn-SAAs vs 4% of the control groups. Among participants with DLB, those who were αSyn-SAA-positive had lower Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores (18.8 ± 5.7 vs 21.2 ± 5.2, = 0.01), had worse parkinsonism on the Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part III (33.8 ± 15.1 vs 25.6 ± 16.4, = 0.001), were more likely to report RBD (114/133 [86%] vs 33/53 [62%], < 0.0001), and had worse hyposmia on the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) (94/105 [90%] below 15th percentile vs 14/44 [32%], < 0.0001). UPSIT percentile had the highest area under the curve (0.87, 95% CI 0.81-0.94) in predicting αSyn-SAA positivity and participants scoring at or below the 15th percentile of age and sex normative values had 18.3 times higher odds (95% CI 7.52-44.6) of having a positive αSyn-SAA test. Among 82 participants with longitudinal CSF samples, 81 (99%) had the same αSyn-SAA result for initial and follow-up specimens.
A substantial proportion of clinically diagnosed participants with DLB had negative αSyn-SAA results. Hyposmia was the strongest clinical predictor of αSyn-SAA positivity. Hyposmia and αSyn-SAA may have utility in improving the diagnostic assessment of individuals with potential DLB.
This study provided Class III evidence that CSF αSyn-SAA distinguishes patients with clinically diagnosed DLB from normal controls.
路易体痴呆症(DLB)的临床诊断取决于识别认知能力显著下降,同时伴有帕金森症的核心特征、视幻觉、认知波动和 REM 睡眠行为障碍(RBD)。嗅觉减退是几个支持性特征之一。α-突触核蛋白种系扩增检测(αSyn-SAA)通过检测 CSF 中的病理性 αSyn 种子,可能会提高诊断准确性。在这项研究中,我们研究了在一大组临床诊断为 DLB 的参与者中,不同的临床特征与 CSF αSyn-SAA 阳性之间的关系。
来自 DLB 联盟多中心观察性队列研究和帕金森病生物标志物计划中的类似研究的横断面和纵向 CSF 样本,由美国学术医疗中心提供,进行了 αSyn-SAA 检测。参与者包括临床诊断为 DLB 的患者和 2 个对照队列。使用逻辑回归评估核心 DLB 特征和嗅觉与 αSyn-SAA 阳性之间的关联。
分析了 191 名临床诊断为 DLB 的参与者(平均年龄 69.9 ± 6.8,15%为女性)、50 名年龄和性别匹配的临床对照参与者和 49 名年轻的分析对照参与者的 CSF 样本。72%(137/191)的 DLB 患者的 αSyn-SAA 为阳性,而对照组的阳性率为 4%。在 DLB 患者中,αSyn-SAA 阳性的患者蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)评分较低(18.8 ± 5.7 vs 21.2 ± 5.2, = 0.01),运动障碍协会统一帕金森病评定量表第三部分(MDS-UPDRS-III)的帕金森症更严重(33.8 ± 15.1 vs 25.6 ± 16.4, = 0.001),更有可能报告 RBD(114/133 [86%] vs 33/53 [62%], < 0.0001),且宾夕法尼亚大学嗅觉识别测试(UPSIT)的嗅觉更差(94/105 [90%]低于 15 百分位数 vs 14/44 [32%], < 0.0001)。UPSIT 百分位数在预测 αSyn-SAA 阳性方面具有最高的曲线下面积(0.87,95%CI 0.81-0.94),并且得分等于或低于年龄和性别正常参考值的第 15 百分位数的参与者,其 αSyn-SAA 阳性检测的可能性高 18.3 倍(95%CI 7.52-44.6)。在 82 名具有纵向 CSF 样本的参与者中,81 名(99%)的初始和随访标本的 αSyn-SAA 结果相同。
相当一部分临床诊断为 DLB 的参与者的 αSyn-SAA 结果为阴性。嗅觉减退是 αSyn-SAA 阳性的最强临床预测因子。嗅觉减退和 αSyn-SAA 可能有助于提高对有潜在 DLB 的个体的诊断评估。
这项研究提供了 III 级证据,表明 CSF αSyn-SAA 可区分临床诊断为 DLB 的患者与正常对照。