Cheng Chi-Fung, Kao Wei-Yi, Lin Mei-Chen, Su Mei-Hsin, Wu Chi-Shin, Fan Chun-Chieh, Wang Shi-Heng
National Center for Geriatrics and Welfare Research, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan.
Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Institute for Psychiatric Behavioral Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2025 Sep 19. doi: 10.1038/s41386-025-02242-9.
Large-scale genetic studies of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) have been performed majority on European ancestry cohorts, potentially missing important population-specific biological insights. Understanding the genetic predisposition for TRD across populations could provide insights for etiologic heterogeneity. Conducting a cohort study of 106,796 unrelated participants using Taiwan Biobank (TWBB), we investigated the association of polygenic score (PGS) with the development of TRD among patients with depression and explore the concordance of the PGS association between East Asian and European populations. Three binary outcomes were defined, including TRD vs. non-major depressive disorder (MDD), treatment responsive MDD (trMDD) vs. non-MDD, and TRD vs. trMDD. Six PGSs belong to personality domains (nervous, worry, guilty feelings, neuroticism, tense, and worry embarrassment) and compulsive PGS were associated with TRD vs. trMDD in TWBB. The pattern of association was consistent across TRD definitions with different dose, duration, and interrupted window for antidepressant treatment. The estimated strength of PGS association in TWBB is consistent with that in All of US (AoU) (meta-analytic R was 68% for TRD vs. non-MDD, 81% for trMDD vs. non-MDD, and 77% for TRD vs. trMDD). PGSs for temperament and education were associated with TRD vs. trMDD in AoU but not in TWBB. There was a moderate to high trans-ancestry concordance for the genetic estimates with TRD, while PGS association for specific traits were not transferable between East Asian and European populations. Genetic research across ancestries and geographic regions is crucial to learn population-specific etiology.
对难治性抑郁症(TRD)的大规模基因研究大多是在欧洲血统队列中进行的,可能遗漏了重要的特定人群生物学见解。了解不同人群中TRD的遗传易感性可为病因异质性提供见解。我们利用台湾生物银行(TWBB)对106,796名无亲属关系的参与者进行了队列研究,调查了多基因评分(PGS)与抑郁症患者TRD发生之间的关联,并探讨了东亚和欧洲人群中PGS关联的一致性。定义了三个二元结局,包括TRD与非重度抑郁症(MDD)、治疗反应性MDD(trMDD)与非MDD、以及TRD与trMDD。六个PGS属于人格领域(紧张、担忧、内疚感、神经质、紧张和担忧尴尬),强迫性PGS与TWBB中TRD与trMDD相关。在不同剂量、持续时间和抗抑郁治疗中断窗口的TRD定义中,关联模式是一致的。TWBB中PGS关联的估计强度与美国全人群(AoU)一致(TRD与非MDD的荟萃分析R为68%,trMDD与非MDD为81%,TRD与trMDD为77%)。气质和教育的PGS在AoU中与TRD与trMDD相关,但在TWBB中不相关。TRD的遗传估计存在中度至高的跨血统一致性,而特定性状的PGS关联在东亚和欧洲人群之间不可转移。跨血统和地理区域的基因研究对于了解特定人群的病因至关重要。