Mikulski Matthew F, Stickney Zachary R, Rizzo Giulia S, Desilets David J, Romanelli John R
Department of Surgery, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School - Baystate Medical Center, 759 Chestnut Street, Springfield, MA, 01199, USA.
Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School - Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2025 Sep 19. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12215-0.
Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a valuable treatment option for achalasia and non-achalasia esophageal motility disorders, but little is known about the effect of type 1 hiatal hernias (T1HH) on POEM outcomes. We hypothesized there would be no difference in technical success or pre- or post-POEM Eckardt scores between those with and without T1HH.
This single-institution, retrospective review analyzed consecutive POEM cases from 6/10/2011-7/16/2024. T1HH were defined by esophagogastroduodenoscopy, manometry, contrast esophagram, or computed tomography imaging. Technical success included an 8 cm myotomy including the esophagogastric junction and extending 2 cm distal. Clinical success was defined as post-POEM Eckardt score ≤ 3. Demographics, T1HH, and pre- and post-procedural Eckardt scores were analyzed using descriptive, univariate, and multivariable logistic regression statistics.
There were 173 POEM cases. Of these, 95(55%) were female, 34(20%) had T1HH, 148(86%) were performed for achalasia, median Eckardt scores were 7[IQR:5.3-9] pre-POEM and 0[IQR:0-1] post-POEM, with clinical success in 146(86%), length of myotomy was median 12[IQR:12-13]cm with technical success in 170(98%). There were no differences found between those with and without T1HH in terms of sex, achalasia diagnosis, previous interventions, pre-POEM Eckardt scores, length of myotomy, or technical success. Compared to those without T1HH, those with T1HH had higher median post-POEM Eckardt scores (median 0[IQR:0-1] vs. 0[IQR:0-0], p = 0.043), lower rates of clinical success (n = 26(76%) vs n = 120(86%), p = 0.01), and had a shorter distance from incisors to EGJ (40[IQR:38.3-41] vs 41[39-43]cm, p = 0.044). After adjustment, presence of T1HH was the only significant factor, conferring 0.13 odds (95%CI: 0.02-0.93, p = 0.042) of clinical success.
POEM produces excellent outcomes in patients with and without T1HH. T1HH did not affect technical success of POEM, but decreased clinical success rate and was associated with higher post-POEM Eckardt scores. POEM practitioners should be cognizant of T1HH and advise patients of its potential implications in their treatment plan.
经口内镜下肌切开术(POEM)是治疗贲门失弛缓症和非贲门失弛缓症食管动力障碍的一种有效治疗选择,但关于1型食管裂孔疝(T1HH)对POEM疗效的影响知之甚少。我们假设,有无T1HH患者在技术成功率或POEM术前及术后埃卡德特评分方面无差异。
本单机构回顾性研究分析了2011年6月10日至2024年7月16日期间连续的POEM病例。T1HH通过食管胃十二指肠镜检查、测压、食管造影或计算机断层扫描成像来定义。技术成功包括8厘米的肌切开术,包括食管胃交界处并向远端延伸2厘米。临床成功定义为POEM术后埃卡德特评分≤3。使用描述性、单变量和多变量逻辑回归统计分析人口统计学、T1HH以及术前和术后埃卡德特评分。
共有173例POEM病例。其中,95例(55%)为女性,34例(20%)有T1HH,148例(86%)因贲门失弛缓症接受手术,术前埃卡德特评分中位数为7[四分位间距:5.3 - 9],术后为0[四分位间距:0 - 1],146例(86%)临床成功,肌切开术长度中位数为12[四分位间距:12 - 13]厘米,170例(98%)技术成功。有无T1HH患者在性别、贲门失弛缓症诊断、既往干预、POEM术前埃卡德特评分、肌切开术长度或技术成功率方面均无差异。与无T1HH患者相比,有T1HH患者的POEM术后埃卡德特评分中位数更高(中位数0[四分位间距:0 - 1] 对 0[四分位间距:0 - 0],p = 0.043),临床成功率更低(n = 26例(76%)对n = 120例(86%),p = 0.01),且从门牙到食管胃交界处的距离更短(40[四分位间距:38.3 - 41]对41[39 - 43]厘米,p = 0.044)。调整后,T1HH的存在是唯一显著因素,临床成功的优势比为0.13(95%置信区间:0.02 - 0.93,p = 0.042)。
POEM在有无T1HH的患者中均产生了良好的疗效。T1HH不影响POEM的技术成功率,但降低了临床成功率,并与POEM术后更高的埃卡德特评分相关。POEM从业者应认识到T1HH,并告知患者其在治疗计划中的潜在影响。