Gkampenis Athanasios, Koukoulithras Ioannis, Lampros Marios, Zagorianakou Panagiota, Voulgaris Spyridon, Alexiou George A
Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, University Hospital of Ioannina, S. Niarhou Avenue, 45500, Ioannina, Greece.
J Ultrasound. 2025 Sep 19. doi: 10.1007/s40477-025-01076-x.
This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) in achieving gross total resections (GTR) and identifying tumor remnants in low-grade glioma (LGG) surgeries.
A search of Medline, Cochrane, and Scopus databases until 8th August 2024 was performed to retrieve relevant studies, while reference lists were also scanned. Studies were selected based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and their methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool.
Thirteen studies were included: 1 prospective randomized controlled trial, 10 prospective studies and 2 retrospective studies. Of these, five studies had a high risk of bias, and eight had significant concerns regarding applicability. One study provided only mean volumes of tumor remnants, while the remaining 12 studies included a total of 352 patients. Eight studies used 2D B-mode iUS, and five used 3D navigated iUS. There was considerable variability in iUS characteristics, reference methods, and outcome measures. Linear array iUS generally demonstrated superior characteristics, and 3D iUS showed promising potential. Sensitivity ranged from 21.05% to 100%, and GTR percentages varied from 10.71% to 100%, while specificity ranged from 66.67% to 100%. Data on remnant volumes were available from only three studies.
From the available literature no safe assumptions on neither the diagnostic accuracy nor the efficacy of iUS in LGG resections can be made.
本系统评价旨在评估术中超声(iUS)在低级别胶质瘤(LGG)手术中实现肿瘤全切除(GTR)及识别肿瘤残留的有效性。
检索截至2024年8月8日的Medline、Cochrane和Scopus数据库以获取相关研究,同时也浏览了参考文献列表。根据预先确定的纳入和排除标准选择研究,并使用诊断准确性研究质量评估2(QUADAS - 2)工具评估其方法学质量。
纳入13项研究:1项前瞻性随机对照试验、10项前瞻性研究和2项回顾性研究。其中,5项研究存在高偏倚风险,8项研究在适用性方面存在重大问题。1项研究仅提供了肿瘤残留的平均体积,其余12项研究共纳入352例患者。8项研究使用二维B模式iUS,5项研究使用三维导航iUS。iUS特征、参考方法和结局指标存在很大差异。线性阵列iUS通常表现出更优的特征,三维iUS显示出有前景的潜力。敏感性范围为21.05%至100%,GTR百分比从10.71%至100%不等,特异性范围为66.67%至100%。仅有三项研究提供了残留体积的数据。
根据现有文献,无法对iUS在LGG切除术中的诊断准确性或疗效做出可靠假设。