Fahrni Guillaume, Si-Mohamed Salim, Wiemker Rafael, Rotzinger David C, Houmeau Angèle, Prieur Cyril, Douek Philippe, Boccalini Sara
Cardiothoracic and Vascular Division, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Radiology Department, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Eur Radiol Exp. 2025 Sep 20;9(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s41747-025-00624-8.
Spectral photon-counting computed tomography (SPCCT) outperformed dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for coronary artery stenosis assessment. However, data about myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is lacking. This feasibility study aimed to evaluate and compare the diagnostic performance of SPCCT and DECT for rest MPI in patients with hemodynamically significant coronary stenoses, using invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) as reference standards.
Eighteen very-high-risk patients with hemodynamically significant coronary stenoses at ICA underwent both dual-layer DECT and SPCCT coronary CT within three days. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MPI in detecting myocardial hypoperfusion were assessed. Quantitative attenuation differences between normal and hypoperfused myocardial segments were compared for both modalities. Interobserver variability was assessed with a weighted kappa analysis.
SPCCT demonstrated comparable overall performance to DECT for MPI, with an overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 73.3%, 79.2%, and 76.9%, respectively, versus 73.3%, 75%, and 74.4% for DECT. SPCCT outperformed DECT in the left anterior descending artery territory, achieving a sensitivity of 87.5%, specificity of 100%, and accuracy of 90%, versus 62.5%, 50%, and 60% for DECT. For each CT system, attenuation analysis revealed differences between normal and hypoperfused segments, with mean differences of 17.9 HU for DECT and 15.8 HU for SPCCT (p < 0.05). Inter-reader agreement was higher for SPCCT (κ = 0.86) compared to DECT (κ = 0.62).
SPCCT and DECT provided similar diagnostic performance for rest MPI in a very-high-risk patient cohort, demonstrating comparable effectiveness in detecting the effects of hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis.
Hemodynamically significant stenosis in very-high-risk patients results in myocardial hypoperfused areas at rest that can be detected equally well with dual-layer CT and spectral photon counting CT, albeit with better reproducibility for the latter.
SPCCT and DECT showed comparable performance for MPI at rest in very-high-risk patients. The differences between normal and hypoperfused segments were of 17 HU and 16 HU on conventional images for DECT and SPCCT. SPCCT showed higher interobserver agreement compared to DECT, suggesting improved reproducibility.
在冠状动脉狭窄评估方面,光谱光子计数计算机断层扫描(SPCCT)优于双能计算机断层扫描(DECT)。然而,关于心肌灌注成像(MPI)的数据尚缺。本可行性研究旨在以有创冠状动脉造影(ICA)和有创血流储备分数(FFR)作为参考标准,评估和比较SPCCT与DECT对血流动力学显著冠状动脉狭窄患者静息MPI的诊断性能。
18例在ICA检查中发现血流动力学显著冠状动脉狭窄的极高危患者在三天内接受了双层DECT和SPCCT冠状动脉CT检查。评估了MPI检测心肌灌注不足的敏感性、特异性和准确性。比较了两种模式下正常心肌节段与灌注不足心肌节段之间的定量衰减差异。采用加权kappa分析评估观察者间的变异性。
SPCCT在MPI方面表现出与DECT相当的总体性能,总体敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为73.3%、79.2%和76.9%,而DECT分别为73.3%、75%和74.4%。SPCCT在左前降支区域的表现优于DECT,敏感性为87.5%,特异性为100%,准确性为90%,而DECT分别为62.5%、50%和60%。对于每个CT系统,衰减分析显示正常节段与灌注不足节段之间存在差异,DECT的平均差异为17.9 HU,SPCCT为15.8 HU(p < 0.05)。与DECT(κ = 0.62)相比,SPCCT的读者间一致性更高(κ = 0.86)。
在极高危患者队列中,SPCCT和DECT对静息MPI的诊断性能相似,在检测血流动力学显著冠状动脉狭窄的影响方面显示出相当的有效性。
极高危患者中血流动力学显著的狭窄会导致静息时心肌灌注不足区域,双层CT和光谱光子计数CT对其检测效果相当,不过后者的可重复性更好。
在极高危患者中,SPCCT和DECT在静息MPI方面表现相当。DECT和SPCCT传统图像上正常节段与灌注不足节段的差异分别为17 HU和16 HU。与DECT相比,SPCCT显示出更高的观察者间一致性,表明可重复性有所提高。