Eriksson Hanna, Schlegel Susan, Koskiniemi Sanna
Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
mBio. 2025 Sep 22:e0208325. doi: 10.1128/mbio.02083-25.
Population heterogeneity is important for multicellular behavior, as well as bet-hedging strategies. Recent findings suggest a role for bacterial toxin delivery in generating population heterogeneity, but the molecular mechanisms by which this occurs are not well understood. Here, we address and delivery of bacterial CdiA toxins generates heterogeneity in an isogenic population of () cells. Using a DNase toxin as a proxy, we find that populations able to deliver the toxin show a heterogeneous expression of the SOS-response gene , whereas those incapable of kin-delivery remain homogeneous. Heterogeneity results from excessive delivery of toxin into some cells, which become intoxicated due to insufficient immunity. A low level of intoxication by this toxin is transiently reversible, and intoxicated cells can be rescued by the synthesis of cognate immunity protein. The fraction of cells experiencing toxicity is increased by liberating the receptor responsible for toxin import from its tasks in outer-membrane biogenesis, suggesting that kin-intoxication is limited by receptor availability. Expression of is regulated by both DNA damage and redox status. Interestingly, kin-delivery changes redox status, whereas intoxicated non-kin cells induce the SOS DNA damage response. The former results in changed expression of metabolic genes, whereas the latter induces prophage excision, which may promote horizontal gene transfer. In conclusion, we identify a molecular mechanism by which heterogeneity is generated through toxin delivery among kin, and some of the consequences of said heterogeneity.
Population heterogeneity is important for multicellularity, as well as for bet-hedging strategies. A heterogeneous population allows cells with the same genotype to respond differently to environmental cues and stresses. For multicellularity, heterogeneity originates from coordinated signaling, whereas bet-hedging strategies can arise stochastically due to cell-to-cell variation in the concentration of signaling molecules. However, recent advances suggest a role for bacterial toxin delivery in the generation of population heterogeneity. How toxins mediate heterogeneity mechanistically is, however, unclear. Here, we show that kin cells transiently intoxicate each other with CdiA toxins, resulting in physiological changes. These changes are specific to the toxic activity, i.e., other toxins with different activities are likely to give rise to other responses. Thus, we find that the arsenal of toxins that bacteria harbor could affect their ability to participate in bet-hedging strategies, as well as in multicellular behavior.
群体异质性对于多细胞行为以及风险对冲策略都很重要。最近的研究结果表明细菌毒素传递在产生群体异质性方面发挥作用,但其中发生的分子机制尚不清楚。在这里,我们探讨细菌CdiA毒素的传递如何在同基因的铜绿假单胞菌(Pseudomonas aeruginosa)细胞群体中产生异质性。使用一种DNA酶毒素作为替代物,我们发现能够传递毒素的铜绿假单胞菌群体显示出SOS反应基因recA的异质性表达,而那些不能进行亲缘传递的群体则保持同质。异质性源于毒素过度传递到一些细胞中,这些细胞由于免疫力不足而中毒。这种毒素的低水平中毒是暂时可逆的,中毒细胞可以通过同源免疫蛋白的合成得到挽救。通过将负责毒素导入的受体从其在外膜生物合成中的任务中解放出来,经历毒性作用的细胞比例会增加,这表明亲缘中毒受受体可用性的限制。recA的表达受DNA损伤和氧化还原状态的调节。有趣的是,亲缘传递会改变氧化还原状态,而中毒的非亲缘细胞会诱导SOS DNA损伤反应。前者导致代谢基因表达的改变,而后者诱导原噬菌体切除,这可能促进水平基因转移。总之,我们确定了一种分子机制,通过这种机制在亲缘个体之间通过毒素传递产生异质性,以及所述异质性的一些后果。
群体异质性对于多细胞性以及风险对冲策略都很重要。异质群体允许具有相同基因型的细胞对环境线索和压力做出不同反应。对于多细胞性,异质性源于协调的信号传导,而风险对冲策略可能由于信号分子浓度的细胞间差异而随机出现。然而,最近的进展表明细菌毒素传递在群体异质性的产生中发挥作用。然而,毒素如何在机制上介导异质性尚不清楚。在这里,我们表明亲缘细胞会用CdiA毒素相互短暂中毒,从而导致生理变化。这些变化特定于毒性活性,即其他具有不同活性的毒素可能会引起其他反应。因此,我们发现细菌所拥有的毒素库可能会影响它们参与风险对冲策略以及多细胞行为的能力。