Sethna Christabelle
Institute of Feminist and Gender Studies, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Can J Public Health. 2025 Aug;116(Suppl 1):30-38. doi: 10.17269/s41997-025-01099-1. Epub 2025 Sep 17.
Decades after its publication, the Lalonde Report is lauded for galvanizing the concept of health promotion. Feminist scholars have faulted the report's androcentrism. However, the report's lack of support for family planning should also be studied by drawing upon the work of historian Larry Collins on abortion, examining the larger backdrop of feminist second-wave dissatisfaction with the 1969 Criminal Code reforms to contraception and abortion, and considering the findings of two significant contemporaneous reports commissioned by the federal government-the Report of the Royal Commission on the Status of Women (1970) and the Report of the Committee on the Operation of the Abortion Law (1977). This exercise underscores that both Marc Lalonde and the federal government fell far short of addressing the family planning needs of Canadian women because of the government's desire to contain the fallout of its reforms to abortion.
《拉隆德报告》发表数十年后,因其激发了健康促进的概念而受到赞誉。女权主义学者批评了该报告的男性中心主义。然而,还应通过借鉴历史学家拉里·柯林斯关于堕胎的著作、审视女权主义第二波浪潮对1969年避孕和堕胎刑法改革不满的更大背景,以及考虑联邦政府委托的两份重要同期报告——《妇女地位皇家委员会报告》(1970年)和《堕胎法实施情况委员会报告》(1977年)的调查结果,来研究该报告对计划生育缺乏支持的问题。这一分析强调,由于政府希望控制其堕胎改革的影响,马克·拉隆德和联邦政府在满足加拿大女性的计划生育需求方面都远远不足。