• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孕产妇和儿童健康与堕胎:建立更紧密的关系。

MCH and Abortion: Towards a Stronger Relationship.

作者信息

Allen Deborah, Sable Marjorie R, Bennett Trude

机构信息

, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

University of Missouri School of Social Work, Columbia, MO, USA.

出版信息

Matern Child Health J. 2025 May 28. doi: 10.1007/s10995-025-04109-3.

DOI:10.1007/s10995-025-04109-3
PMID:40437266
Abstract

The history of abortion rights in the US is long and contentious. Women have always had abortions, legal or not, and the legalization fight in recent history has been led by feminists. This paper tracks the course of that history through the Progressive Era of the first wave feminists, second wave feminism from the 1960s to the 1973 Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision, the reactive period of trying to minimize the harm of abortion restrictions, and the consequences of the 2022 Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision overthrowing Roe v. Wade. For each time period we ask who was leading the fight, how they framed their advocacy, who were their opponents and what arguments they used, and the extent to which maternal and child health (MCH) professionals and institutions engaged in the struggle. We offer recommendations for MCH practice going forward to (1) embrace women's health and health care as inseparable from infant, child, and family health, and abortion as central to women's physical and mental health; (2) build partnerships and coalitions among entities identified with MCH and those advocating reproductive rights, particularly abortion; (3) become voices for abortion as an essential part of MCH and public health; and (4) framing abortion as an equity issue. Women's judgment about the timing of their own childbearing and women's ability to act on that judgment improves maternal and child survival and wellbeing.

摘要

美国堕胎权的历史漫长且充满争议。无论合法与否,女性一直都有进行堕胎的情况,而近代争取合法化的斗争一直由女权主义者引领。本文追溯了这段历史的进程,涵盖了第一波女权主义者的进步时代、从20世纪60年代到1973年最高法院“罗诉韦德案”判决的第二波女权运动、试图将堕胎限制的危害降至最低的反应期,以及2022年推翻“罗诉韦德案”的“多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案”判决的后果。对于每个时间段,我们探讨谁在引领这场斗争、他们如何构建自己的倡导、他们的对手是谁以及对手使用了哪些论点,以及母婴健康(MCH)专业人员和机构在这场斗争中的参与程度。我们为未来的母婴健康实践提供建议:(1)将妇女健康和医疗保健视为与婴儿、儿童和家庭健康不可分割,将堕胎视为妇女身心健康的核心;(2)在与母婴健康相关的实体和倡导生殖权利(特别是堕胎权利)的实体之间建立伙伴关系和联盟;(3)发出声音,将堕胎作为母婴健康和公共卫生的重要组成部分;(4)将堕胎界定为一个公平问题。女性对自己生育时机的判断以及根据该判断采取行动的能力,会提高母婴的生存几率和幸福程度。

相似文献

1
MCH and Abortion: Towards a Stronger Relationship.孕产妇和儿童健康与堕胎:建立更紧密的关系。
Matern Child Health J. 2025 May 28. doi: 10.1007/s10995-025-04109-3.
2
Health Equity in a Post 'Roe Versus Wade' America.“罗诉韦德案”裁决后美国的健康公平性
Cureus. 2022 Dec 1;14(12):e32100. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32100. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3
The laws that affect abortion in the United States and their impact on women's health.美国影响堕胎的法律及其对女性健康的影响。
Nurse Pract. 1991 Dec;16(12):53-9. doi: 10.1097/00006205-199112000-00013.
4
Overturning Roe v. Wade: consequences for midlife women's health and well-being.推翻罗诉韦德案:对中年女性健康与福祉的影响
Womens Midlife Health. 2023 Jan 6;9(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40695-022-00085-8.
5
People's knowledge of and attitudes toward abortion laws before and after the decision.决定前后人们对堕胎法的了解和态度。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2233794. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2233794.
6
Abortion Is a Right: Perspectives of Family Medicine Physician Residents.堕胎是一项权利:家庭医学住院医师的观点。
Cureus. 2022 Nov 14;14(11):e31506. doi: 10.7759/cureus.31506. eCollection 2022 Nov.
7
Politics of reproduction: a view from Israel on the Dobbs decision.生殖政治:多布斯裁决的以色列视角
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2023 Jan 24;12(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13584-022-00550-9.
8
Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.罗诉韦德案之后,凯西案之后:一项“基本”权利的现状与未来。
Womens Health Issues. 1993 Fall;3(3):162-70. doi: 10.1016/s1049-3867(05)80251-8.
9
The end of Roe v. Wade: implications for Women's mental health and care.罗诉韦德案的终结:对女性心理健康与护理的影响
Front Psychiatry. 2023 May 5;14:1087045. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1087045. eCollection 2023.
10
International dimensions of the Department of Justice arguments in the Webster case.美国司法部在韦伯斯特案中的论点所涉及的国际层面。
Law Med Health Care. 1989 Winter;17(4):384-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1989.tb01120.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Infant Deaths After Texas' 2021 Ban on Abortion in Early Pregnancy.德克萨斯州 2021 年禁止早期妊娠堕胎后婴儿死亡。
JAMA Pediatr. 2024 Aug 1;178(8):784-791. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.0885.
2
Testing the Effectiveness of a Community-Based Peer Support Intervention to Mitigate Social Isolation and Stigma of Adolescent Motherhood in Zimbabwe.测试基于社区的同伴支持干预措施在减轻津巴布韦青少年母亲社会孤立和耻辱感方面的有效性。
Matern Child Health J. 2024 Apr;28(4):657-666. doi: 10.1007/s10995-023-03821-2. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
3
Child Care as a Barrier to Perinatal Health Care in Illinois.
伊利诺伊州的儿童保育对围产期保健的阻碍。
Matern Child Health J. 2024 Feb;28(2):221-228. doi: 10.1007/s10995-023-03784-4. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
4
Texas' 2021 Ban on Abortion in Early Pregnancy and Changes in Live Births.德克萨斯州2021年对早期妊娠堕胎的禁令及活产情况的变化。
JAMA. 2023 Jul 18;330(3):281-282. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.12034.
5
Abortion and the Mission of MCH: Perspectives of MCH and Family Planning Professionals in Health Departments.人工流产与 MCH 使命:卫生部门的 MCH 和计划生育专业人员的观点。
Matern Child Health J. 2022 Feb;26(2):381-388. doi: 10.1007/s10995-021-03235-y. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
6
The geography of sentiment towards the Women's March of 2017.2017 年妇女大游行的情感地理学。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 4;15(6):e0233994. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233994. eCollection 2020.
7
Self-reported Physical Health of Women Who Did and Did Not Terminate Pregnancy After Seeking Abortion Services: A Cohort Study.寻求堕胎服务后选择终止妊娠和未终止妊娠的女性自我报告的身体健康状况:一项队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Aug 20;171(4):238-247. doi: 10.7326/M18-1666. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
8
Women's Mental Health and Well-being 5 Years After Receiving or Being Denied an Abortion: A Prospective, Longitudinal Cohort Study.女性在堕胎后五年的精神健康和幸福感:一项前瞻性、纵向队列研究。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Feb 1;74(2):169-178. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.3478.
9
Transformation of the title V maternal and child health services block grant.标题五母婴健康服务整笔拨款的变更
Matern Child Health J. 2015 May;19(5):927-31. doi: 10.1007/s10995-015-1736-8.
10
A new performance measurement system for maternal and child health in the United States.美国一种新的母婴健康绩效评估系统。
Matern Child Health J. 2015 May;19(5):945-57. doi: 10.1007/s10995-015-1739-5.