Parsons Stephanie, Hayes Wesley, Kabwe Gillian, Yamba Francis, Serenje Nancy, Bailis Robert, Jagger Pamela, Grieshop Andrew P
Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering North Carolina State University Raleigh NC USA.
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Northeastern University Boston MA USA.
Geohealth. 2025 Sep 21;9(9):e2024GH001178. doi: 10.1029/2024GH001178. eCollection 2025 Sep.
Eighty-four percent of sub-Saharan African households rely on polluting fuels (e.g., wood, charcoal) for cooking, leading to high levels of household air pollution (HAP). While switching to modern fuels/stoves could decrease HAP levels, they are not always available or affordable. Improved biomass cookstoves could provide an intermediate step supporting transitions from traditional biomass to clean burning fuels/stoves. We conducted two stove intervention trials in Lusaka, Zambia using targeted marketing/incentives to motivate participants to use improved biomass stoves, either the Mimi Moto (pellet) or the EcoZoom (charcoal). Before the intervention, 65% of participants exclusively used charcoal, while 27% relied on electricity to some extent for cooking. We measured 24-hr personal exposure to CO ( = 747) and PM ( = 90) of primary cooks. We implemented several statistical approaches to estimate the effects of interventions on exposure: household-specific endline minus baseline exposure, ranksum testing, difference-in-differences analyses, and cross-sectional analyses. We found that switching from traditional charcoal stoves to either intervention stove was not associated with significantly reduced exposures. However, cooks using electric stoves independent of the intervention did have significantly lower CO exposures than those using traditional charcoal, with greater electric stove use corresponding to greater exposure reductions. Variability in exposure was dominated by seasonal, regional, and neighborhood differences rather than household stove/fuel choices. A focus on HAP exposure from cooking in urban settings is unlikely to yield expected exposure reductions. Policy makers should consider pollution reduction policies/interventions that target ambient air quality in tandem with HAP-mitigating strategies to address air pollution health burden.
撒哈拉以南非洲地区84%的家庭依靠污染性燃料(如木材、木炭)做饭,导致家庭空气污染(HAP)程度很高。虽然改用现代燃料/炉灶可以降低家庭空气污染程度,但这些燃料/炉灶并非总是可得或价格可承受。改良生物质炉灶可以提供一个中间步骤,支持从传统生物质向清洁燃烧燃料/炉灶的过渡。我们在赞比亚卢萨卡进行了两项炉灶干预试验,利用定向营销/激励措施促使参与者使用改良生物质炉灶,即咪咪摩托(颗粒)炉灶或生态变焦(木炭)炉灶。在干预之前,65%的参与者仅使用木炭,而27%的参与者在一定程度上依靠电力做饭。我们测量了主要做饭者24小时的个人一氧化碳(=747)和颗粒物(=90)暴露量。我们采用了几种统计方法来估计干预对暴露量的影响:家庭特定的终期暴露量减去基线暴露量、秩和检验、差分分析和横断面分析。我们发现,从传统木炭炉灶改用任何一种干预炉灶与暴露量显著降低无关。然而,独立于干预措施使用电炉的做饭者的一氧化碳暴露量确实显著低于使用传统木炭的做饭者,电炉使用量越大,暴露量减少幅度越大。暴露量的差异主要由季节、区域和邻里差异决定,而非家庭炉灶/燃料选择。关注城市环境中烹饪造成的家庭空气污染暴露量不太可能实现预期的暴露量降低。政策制定者应考虑将针对环境空气质量的污染减排政策/干预措施与减轻家庭空气污染的战略结合起来,以应对空气污染对健康的负担。