Sharrief Anjail, Wollen Joshua, Almohamad Maha, Denny M Carter, Jones Erica, Venkatachalam Aardhra M, Navalkele Digvijaya, Chandra Shivika, Ahmed Mariam, Pratt Robert, Shy Bradley D, McMenamy John, Izeogu Chigozirim, Skolarus Lesli E, Ifejika Nneka L, Gonzales Nicole R
Department of Neurology, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth).
University of Houston College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Practice and Translational Research.
Equity Neurosci. 2025 Apr;1(1). doi: 10.1016/j.neuros.2025.100005. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
Safety net hospitals (SNHs) provide care to patients regardless of their insurance status or ability to pay, serving populations at the highest risk for poor stroke outcomes. These include historically marginalized racial and ethnic groups, and individuals disproportionately affected by adverse social drivers of health, including lower socioeconomic status, housing instability, and limited access to preventive care. Improving stroke care at SNHs presents a critical opportunity to strengthen care delivery for individuals with the greatest need. However, such efforts require a clear understanding of the barriers across all levels of the healthcare system. In this Perspective, the authors adopt a socioecological framework to explore patient-, community-, institution-, and policy-level influences on stroke care in SNHs. Patient-level barriers include chronic disease burden, limited health literacy, and language barriers. Community-level challenges, such as neighborhood disadvantage, transportation challenges, and food insecurity, contribute to delays in care and recovery. At the institutional level SNHs often face inconsistent access to diagnostic imaging, limited specialty support, variation in stroke center certification, and staffing shortages. At the policy level, financing structures, documentation requirements, and performance metrics may unintentionally penalize under-resourced hospitals. Findings have been synthesized in this text across these domains and highlight opportunities for research, workforce development, and stroke care delivery improvement. A socioecological approach is essential to addressing disparities in stroke outcomes and guiding multilevel strategies that ensure consistent, high-quality care for underserved populations.
安全网医院(SNHs)为患者提供医疗服务,无论其保险状况或支付能力如何,服务的人群中风不良结局风险最高。这些人群包括历史上被边缘化的种族和族裔群体,以及受不良健康社会驱动因素影响尤为严重的个人,这些因素包括社会经济地位较低、住房不稳定以及获得预防性护理的机会有限。改善安全网医院的中风护理为加强对最有需要的个人的护理提供了一个关键机会。然而,此类努力需要清楚了解医疗保健系统各级的障碍。在这篇观点文章中,作者采用社会生态框架来探讨患者、社区、机构和政策层面因素对安全网医院中风护理的影响。患者层面的障碍包括慢性病负担、健康素养有限和语言障碍。社区层面的挑战,如邻里劣势、交通困难和粮食不安全,会导致护理和康复延迟。在机构层面,安全网医院常常面临诊断成像设备获取不一致、专科支持有限、中风中心认证存在差异以及人员短缺等问题。在政策层面,融资结构、文件要求和绩效指标可能会无意中对资源不足的医院造成不利影响。本文综合了这些领域的研究结果,突出了研究、劳动力发展和改善中风护理服务方面的机会。社会生态方法对于解决中风结局方面的差异以及指导确保为服务不足人群提供持续、高质量护理的多层次策略至关重要。